The shrinking geometries in today’s 3-D integrated circuit (IC) designs generate an urgent need for a variety of tools to isolate failures on advanced semiconductor devices. There has been no single technique that adequately addresses all types of failures with the required fast cycle time. Complex failures that are not resolved by the faster global approaches are best addressed by probing technologies, where waveforms or voltages are measured from node to node. These approaches are time-consuming and usually require detailed understanding of the circuit operation. Global techniques that map the secondary effects of defects have been widely used for as many failures as possible. These secondary effects include thermal emission, photon emission, and circuit operation dependencies on localized heating or carrier generation at a defect site. Each technique addresses some segment of the failure mechanisms, but none is universally effective in itself. The use of thermal emission techniques has waned due to the issues of lower power supply voltages, which result in poor sensitivity for older techniques and decrease in minimum resolved feature sizes.

Reflecting back on the past 45 years in semiconductor failure analysis, the columnist notes that the trend lines have deviated little over that time. He then goes on to point out the relatively few discontinuities, the latest of which, the emergence of the “invisible defect,” takes him back to the beginning of his journey.

The Electronic Device Failure Analysis (EDFA) magazine celebrates its 10th anniversary with this issue. This significant milestone provides an opportunity to recall the transition of the Electronic Device Failure Analysis News (EDFAN) newsletter to EDFA magazine. When Chuck Hawkins, then the Editor of EDFAN, proposed converting from a newsletter to a magazine, EDFAS was only a few years into existence, and there was apprehension about such an early transition.

This article looks back on the ten-year history of Electronic Device Failure Analysis News and its transition to become Electronic Device Failure Analysis Magazine.

Semiconductor trends, as embodied in the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS), provide a guide for the challenges facing the failure analysis community. This process is a risk assessment of key features forecast for the impact of future technologies on failure analysis. The technical challenges fall primarily into two categories: failure site isolation and physical analysis. The failure site isolation challenges are largely driven by the device complexity and reduced accessibility of circuit nets. Additional challenges arise due to the increase in device operating speed and pin count. The challenges in physical analysis are driven primarily by smaller device feature sizes and by the host of new materials being introduced. In addition to the technical challenges, infrastructure changes are also likely to occur. The industry paths for addressing these challenges are discussed.

This article addresses the considerations related to the development and introduction of new materials in response to the increasing performance demands of microelectronic devices, and how these new materials will affect characterization and failure analysis. The article is largely extracted from the “Deprocessing/Inspection White Paper” generated by the SEMATECH Product Analysis Forum (PAF), with updates from the PAF response to the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors.

Many standard physical failure site isolation techniques require an electrical stimulus to drive test devices into a failing condition. This function has been provided by bench test electronics for some time, but increasing device complexity is causing a migration to more sophisticated equipment such as pattern generators and logic analyzers. In anticipation of further increases in pin count and density, a new class of small footprint testers is emerging. These portable systems, called ASIC verification testers, facilitate the transfer of ATE test programs to failure analysis laboratories at relatively low cost.