Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Subjects
Article Type
Volume Subject Area
Date
Availability
1-7 of 7
H.H. Yap
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Proceedings Papers
ISTFA2018, ISTFA 2018: Conference Proceedings from the 44th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, 214-218, October 28–November 1, 2018,
Abstract
View Papertitled, EBAC Analysis with Chemically Enhanced FIB Milling Assists Technique on Large Kerf/PCM Test Structure
View
PDF
for content titled, EBAC Analysis with Chemically Enhanced FIB Milling Assists Technique on Large Kerf/PCM Test Structure
The ability to expose a huge kerf/PCM (Process Control Monitor) test structure at the same level is limited from top down finger polishing. Also, in Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) the electron beam (e-beam) shift for electron beam absorbed current (EBAC) analysis is not able to cover the whole structure. The recently implemented technique described herein combines the focus ion beam (FIB) chemical enhanced milling method with EBAC analysis to stop the polishing at the upper layer and split the EBAC analysis into portions from the test structure. These help to improve the area of interest (AOI) evenness and enable the extension of the EBAC analysis.
Proceedings Papers
ISTFA2017, ISTFA 2017: Conference Proceedings from the 43rd International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, 550-555, November 5–9, 2017,
Abstract
View Papertitled, Application of Laser Deprocessing Techniques to Improve the Job Efficiency and Throughput on Logic Device
View
PDF
for content titled, Application of Laser Deprocessing Techniques to Improve the Job Efficiency and Throughput on Logic Device
There are several methods commonly used to locate the area of interest (AOI), such as using layout landmarks, applying laser marks, focus ion beam marks, etc. This paper discusses another method which can improve the job efficiency and cost-effectiveness by introducing the combination of laser marking and laser deprocessing technique (LDT) as a quick way to deprocess the AOI. It further explores LDT to improve the job efficiency and throughput in logic devices to achieve cost-saving targets. An experiment was performed on a 14nm technology node prototype chip that integrated logic and SRAM. The proposed LDT has demonstrated itself to be a useful method to increase the job efficiency by performing in batch and easy to locate the AOI upon loading the sample for SEM inspection. It is also a simple and cost-effective way to delayer comparing to other methodologies.
Proceedings Papers
ISTFA2014, ISTFA 2014: Conference Proceedings from the 40th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, 196-201, November 9–13, 2014,
Abstract
View Papertitled, Utilizing Nanoprobing and Circuit Diagnostics to Identify Key Failure Mechanism of Otherwise Nonvisible Defects in 20 nm Logic Devices
View
PDF
for content titled, Utilizing Nanoprobing and Circuit Diagnostics to Identify Key Failure Mechanism of Otherwise Nonvisible Defects in 20 nm Logic Devices
In this work, we present two case studies on the utilization of advanced nanoprobing on 20nm logic devices at contact layer to identify the root cause of scan logic failures. In both cases, conventional failure analysis followed by inspection of passive voltage contrast (PVC) failed to identify any abnormality in the devices. Technology advancement makes identifying failure mechanisms increasingly more challenging using conventional methods of physical failure analysis (PFA). Almost all PFA cases for 20nm technology node devices and beyond require Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) analysis. Before TEM analysis can be performed, fault isolation is required to correctly determine the precise failing location. Isolated transistor probing was performed on the suspected logic NMOS and PMOS transistors to identify the failing transistors for TEM analysis. In this paper, nanoprobing was used to isolate the failing transistor of a logic cell. Nanoprobing revealed anomalies between the drain and bulk junction which was found to be due to contact gouging of different severities.
Proceedings Papers
ISTFA2014, ISTFA 2014: Conference Proceedings from the 40th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, 268-273, November 9–13, 2014,
Abstract
View Papertitled, Application of Fast Laser Deprocessing Techniques in Physical Failure Analysis on SRAM Memory of Advance Technology
View
PDF
for content titled, Application of Fast Laser Deprocessing Techniques in Physical Failure Analysis on SRAM Memory of Advance Technology
With technology scaling of semiconductor devices and further growth of the integrated circuit (IC) design and function complexity, it is necessary to increase the number of transistors in IC’s chip, layer stacks, and process steps. The last few metal layers of Back End Of Line (BEOL) are usually very thick metal lines (>4μm thickness) and protected with hard Silicon Dioxide (SiO2) material that is formed from (TetraEthyl OrthoSilicate) TEOS as Inter-Metal Dielectric (IMD). In order to perform physical failure analysis (PFA) on the logic or memory, the top thick metal layers must be removed. It is time-consuming to deprocess those thick metal and IMD layers using conventional PFA workflows. In this paper, the Fast Laser Deprocessing Technique (FLDT) is proposed to remove the BEOL thick and stubborn metal layers for memory PFA. The proposed FLDT is a cost-effective and quick way to deprocess a sample for defect identification in PFA.
Proceedings Papers
ISTFA2014, ISTFA 2014: Conference Proceedings from the 40th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, 469-473, November 9–13, 2014,
Abstract
View Papertitled, Investigation of Protection Layer Materials for Ex-Situ Lift-Out TEM Sample Preparation with FIB for 14 nm FinFET
View
PDF
for content titled, Investigation of Protection Layer Materials for Ex-Situ Lift-Out TEM Sample Preparation with FIB for 14 nm FinFET
With continuous scaling of CMOS device dimensions, sample preparation for Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) analysis becomes increasingly important and challenging as the required sample thickness is less than several tens of nanometers. This paper studies the protection materials for FIB milling to increase the success rate of ex-situ ‘lift-out’ TEM sample preparation on 14nm Fin-Field Effect Transistor (FinFET).
Proceedings Papers
ISTFA2013, ISTFA 2013: Conference Proceedings from the 39th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, 563-568, November 3–7, 2013,
Abstract
View Papertitled, Application of Laser Deprocessing Techniques in Physical Failure Analysis
View
PDF
for content titled, Application of Laser Deprocessing Techniques in Physical Failure Analysis
With the scaling of semiconductor devices to nanometer range, ensuring surface uniformity over a large area while performing top down physical delayering has become a greater challenge. In this paper, the application of laser deprocessing technique (LDT) to achieve better surface uniformity as well as for fast deprocessing of sample for defect identification in nanoscale devices are discussed. The proposed laser deprocess technique is a cost-effective and quick way to deprocess sample for defect identification and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) analysis.
Proceedings Papers
ISTFA2013, ISTFA 2013: Conference Proceedings from the 39th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, 569-575, November 3–7, 2013,
Abstract
View Papertitled, Top-Down Delayering with Planar Slicing Focus Ion Beam (TD-PS-XFIB)
View
PDF
for content titled, Top-Down Delayering with Planar Slicing Focus Ion Beam (TD-PS-XFIB)
Top-down, layer-by-layer de-layering inspection with a mechanical polisher and serial cross-sectional Focused Ion Beam (XFIB) slicing are two common approaches for physical failure analysis (PFA). This paper uses XFIB to perform top-down, layer-by-layer de-layering followed by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) inspection. The advantage of the FIB-SEM de-layering technique over mechanical de-layering is better control of the de-layering process. Combining the precise milling capability of the FIB with the real-time imaging capability of the SEM enables the operator to observe the de-layering as it progresses, minimizing the likelihood of removing either too much or too little material. Furthermore, real time SEM view during top-down XFIB de-layering is able to provide a better understanding of how the defects are formed and these findings could then be feedback to the production line for process improvement.