This paper illustrated the beauty of AFP nanoprobing as the critical failure analysis tool in resolving the one-time programmable (OTP) non-volatile memory data retention failures through electrical simulation in wafer fabrication. Layout analysis, electrical simulation using Meilke’s method, UV erase methodology (to differentiate between mobile ion Meilke’s method contamination and charge trap centers) and a few other FA approaches were employed to determine the different root causes in the three OTP failure case detailed in this paper.. These include SiN trap center issue, poly stringers and abnormal layer at the initial CESL (Contact etch stop layer) nitride. This paper placed a strong emphasis on systematic problem solving approach, deep dive and use of right FA approach/tool that are essentially critical to FA analysts in wafer foundry since there is always minimal available data provided. It would serve as a good reference to wafer Fab that encountered such issue.

This paper places a strong emphasis on the importance of applying the correct FA approach in physical sample preparation to identify hidden defects that can be easily removed during analysis. A combination of mechanical parallel polishing and chemical etching was used during the sample preparation after electrical fault isolation. Such a combination is both effective and efficient in identifying the single Via punch-through from a sea of Via in MIM structure as well as finding the thin layer of barrier bridging under the Al metal. It serves as a quick way to verify any suspect without time consuming FIB progressive cuts at the hotspot location which sometimes turns out to be an induced spot with a defect located at other site due to the circuitry connection. It would serve as a good reference to wafer fab that encountered such issues.

This paper discussed on how the importance of failure analysis to identify the root cause and mechanism that resulted in the MEMS failure. The defect seen was either directly on the MEMS caps or the CMOS integrated chip in wafer fabrication. Two case studies were highlighted in the discussion to demonstrate how the FA procedures that the analysts had adopted in order to narrow down to the defect site successfully on MEMS cap as well as on CMOS chip on MEMS package units. Besides the use of electrical fault isolation tool/technique such as TIVA for defect localization, a new physical deprocessing approach based on the cutting method was performed on the MEMS package unit in order to separate the MEMS from the Si Cap. This approach would definitely help to prevent the introduction of particles and artifacts during the PFA that could mislead the FA analyst into wrong data interpretation. Other FA tool such as SEM inspection to observe the physical defect and Auger analysis to identify the elements in the defect during the course of analysis were also documented in this paper.

This paper placed a strong emphasis on the importance of applying Systematic Problem Solving approach, deep dive and use of right/appropriate FA approach/tools that are essentially critical to FA analysts to understand the “real” root cause. A case of low yield with polar failing pattern was seen and matched well with the Al Pad etch E chuck configuration. Customer also reported of passivation crack issue at the solder bumps. All these evidences suggested the root cause was related to wafer fabrication issue. However, it was through a strong “inquisitive” mindset coupled with the essence of such strong problem solving approach that led to uncover the actual root cause. Although customer test condition was not able to be duplicated due to limited information available in foundry industry, a four point probing alternative method was engaged to overcome this limitation. Unlike typical case, the AlOx thickness was comparable for bad and good dies. Further in depth analysis subsequently revealed the higher O content in the AlOx for the bad dies that was the real culprit for the higher bump resistance. This paper highlights the job of FA analyst is not simply finding defect but also plays a catalyst role in root cause/failure mechanism understanding by providing supporting FA evidence (electrically / physically) to Fab. It would serve as a good reference to wafer Fab that encountered such issue.

This paper places a strong emphasis on the importance of applying Systematic Problem Solving approach and use of appropriate FA methods and tools to understand the “real” failure root cause. A case of wafer center cluster RAM fail due to systematic missing Cu was studied. It was through a strong “inquisitive” mindset coupled with deep dive problem solving that lead to uncover the actual root cause of large Cu voids. The missing Cu was due to large Cu void induced by galvanic effects from the faster removal rate during Cu CMP and subsequently resulted in missing Cu. This highlights that the FA analyst’s mission is not simply to find defects but also play a catalyst role in root cause/failure mechanism understanding by providing supporting FA evidence (electrically/ physically) to Fab.

This paper illustrated the beauty of AFP nano-probing as the critical failure analysis tool in localizing new product design weakness. A 40nm case of HTOL Pin Leakage due to Source/Drain punch-through at a systematic location was discussed. The root cause and mechanism was due to VDS overdrive testing issue. This paper placed a strong emphasis on systematic problem solving approach, deep dive and use of right FA approach/tool that are essentially critical to FA analysts in wafer foundry since there is always minimal available data provided. It would serve as a good reference to wafer Fab that encountered such issue.

With the evolution of advanced process technology, failure analysis is becoming much more challenging and difficult particularly with an increase in more erratic defect types arising from non-visual failure mechanisms. Conventional FA techniques work well in failure analysis on defectively related issue. However, for soft defect localization such as S/D leakage or short due to design related, it may not be simple to identify it. AFP and its applications have been successfully engaged to overcome such shortcoming, In this paper, two case studies on systematic issues due to soft failures were discussed to illustrate the AFP critical role in current failure analysis field on these areas. In other words, these two case studies will demonstrate how Atomic Force Probing combined with Scanning Capacitance Microscopy were used to characterize failing transistors in non-volatile memory, identify possible failure mechanisms and enable device/ process engineers to make adjustment on process based on the electrical characterization result. [1]

High gate to source/drain (S/D) leakage was observed at both failed pins and ET structures with random failure signatures. Detailed TEM failure analysis revealed an abnormal thin Nitrogen-rich nitride layer along the poly gate which extended to the S/D regions. Along the abnormal nitride layer, appreciable Arsenic (As) segregation occurred. The segregated As dopants at these interfaces may form a continuous conducting path, accounting for the gate to S/D leakage mechanism. The preferable As segregation at the Silicon nitride interface may be related to a vacancy-assisted As diffusion process.

In this paper, we will describe a low yield case which revealed itself as leakage failures near the wafer edge. A systematic problem solving approach was used based on the application of a variety of FA techniques such as electrical curve tracing, Spreading Resistance Probing (SRP), Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS), and Chemical Analysis coupled with extensive Fab investigations. These techniques transformed an invisible defect into a visible one, leading to a full resolution of the issue with good understanding of the failure mechanism and the root cause. We will show that the wafer edge leakage was the result of N-type contamination of the substrate due to Phosphorus outgassing from the V-ring during the high temperature Argon anneal process.