Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Subjects
Article Type
Volume Subject Area
Date
Availability
1-2 of 2
E. Deppe
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Proceedings Papers
ITSC 2006, Thermal Spray 2006: Proceedings from the International Thermal Spray Conference, 1107-1112, May 15–18, 2006,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
Newly developed iron based hard alloy powders with high chromium and vanadium contents are used for coating production by means of HVOF and LPPS. Crack free and dense coatings with fairly homogeneous microstructure are possible for both spraying methods. XRD analyses of sprayed coatings prove phase compositions similar to those of the powder feedstock when using HVOF systems. In contrast LPPS coatings contain a large share of amorphous phase. Microhardness of LPPS and HVOF coatings is about 1,200 HV0.3 and 800 - 950 HV0.3 respectively. The higher microhardness of LPPS coatings is attributed to the presence of the amorphous phase. However, LPPS coatings are brittle and tend to crack under mechanical load. Wear resistance of coatings is determined by means of corundum grinding disk and ASTM G65 wear test. Corrosion behavior is characterized by means of salt fog test and electrochemical measurements. Cermet and stainless steel 316L coatings are used for comparative purposes in the investigations.
Proceedings Papers
ITSC 2005, Thermal Spray 2005: Proceedings from the International Thermal Spray Conference, 887-891, May 2–4, 2005,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
HVOF sprayed WC/Co(Cr) and Cr 3 C 2 /Ni20Cr composite coatings have gained high acceptance in many industrial applications for protection of components against wear. The achieved coatings have quite good corrosion resistance for use of chromium containing matrices. Present research in the field of PTA-Surfacing resulted in the development of high chromium and high vanadium containing iron based hard alloys with simultaneous improvement of abrasive wear and corrosion resistance. These properties of the PTA-Surfaced coatings were studied and it was found that the newly developed alloys have nearly same wear resistance and improved corrosion resistance compared to Co-based alloys reinforced with Fused Tungsten Carbides (FTC). One major advantage of high chromium and high vanadium containing iron based coatings is machinability by turning and milling processes. These features make it attractive to be used in thermal spraying. The absence of substrate melting in HVOF-spraying is advantageous, as the coatings preserve the properties of the alloy due to prevention of dilution with substrate material in contrast to PTA-Surfacing. High chromium and high vanadium containing iron based atomized powder was used for HVOF spraying and deposition efficiency was measured. The sprayed coatings were studied metallographically by optical microscopy, SEM, XRD and micro-hardness measurements. Later, abrasive wear and corrosion properties of the coatings are investigated.