Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Subjects
Article Type
Volume Subject Area
Date
Availability
1-1 of 1
David E. Wolff
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Proceedings Papers
HT2017, Heat Treat 2017: Proceedings from the 29th Heat Treating Society Conference and Exposition, 91-98, October 24–26, 2017,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
For decades, industrial gas providers have tried to develop a compelling reason for metal thermal processing shops to switch from the dominant dissociated ammonia atmosphere technology to hydrogen/nitrogen blended gas “synthetic” atmospheres. Two problems interfered with this business approach – ammonia for dissociation was generally very cheap, and the alternatives that the industrial gas companies proposed did not solve all of the issues faced by the thermal processors. The offerings of the industrial gas providers failed to displace dissociated ammonia in most installations because the cost of the atmosphere was high as compared with dissociated ammonia, and the solution proposed by the industrial gas providers simply replaced one highly hazardous gas delivery and storage problem – ammonia – with another – hydrogen. Users and their local Authorities Having Jurisdiction did not find the tradeoff attractive to swap ammonia storage for hydrogen storage. Onsite hydrogen generation technology makes it possible to replace delivered, stored hazardous ammonia with “zero-inventory” onsite generated hydrogen and stored or generated nitrogen. This approach eliminates the hazardous material objection to ammonia replacement for thermal processors and makes it much more interesting to consider replacement of dissociated ammonia with hydrogen/nitrogen. While economic issues remain, a look at total costs of operation makes hydrogen/nitrogen generation a viable and growing solution for thermal processors. This paper reviews results for several customers that transitioned successfully from dissociated ammonia to hydrogen/nitrogen. The discussion addresses costs, regulatory compliance, and process results.