Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Subjects
Article Type
Volume Subject Area
Date
Availability
1-3 of 3
Chen Yixin
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Proceedings Papers
ISTFA2015, ISTFA 2015: Conference Proceedings from the 41st International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, 278-281, November 1–5, 2015,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
In the authors' previous papers, the failure mechanism and elimination solutions of galvanic corrosion (Al-Cu cell) on microchip Al bondpads in the Al process (0.18un and above) have been studied [1-2]. In this paper, the authors will further study the failure mechanism and root cause of galvanic corrosion (Al-Cu cell) on microchip Al bondpads in the Cu process (0.13um and below) with Ta barrier metal. Based on our results, the root cause of galvanic corrosion (Al-Cu cell) in the Al process is only one way and Al-Cu cell is from Al alloy (Al + 0.5%Cu) on Al bondpads. However, in the Cu process it may be from two ways and Al-Cu cell can be from both Al alloy (Al + 0.5%Cu) on Al bondpads and the Cu metal layer below the barrier metal Ta when Ta has weak points or pinhole. As such, the pinhole defects on Al bondpad caused by galvanic corrosion (Al-Cu cell) in the Cu process might be more serious than that in the Al process. In this paper, TEM is used for root cause identification. Based on the TEM results, galvanic corrosion was due to the weak point/pinhole at the Ta barrier metal layer and Al-Cu diffusion.
Proceedings Papers
ISTFA2015, ISTFA 2015: Conference Proceedings from the 41st International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, 295-297, November 1–5, 2015,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
In authors’ previous paper, an OSAT [Optical, SEM (Scanning Electron Microscopy), Auger (Auger Electron Spectroscopy) and TEM (Transmission Electron Microscopy)] methodology was developed for qualification of microchip aluminum (Al) bondpads. Using the OSAT methodology, one can qualify microchip Al bondpads. In this paper, we will further study the NSOP (Non-Stick On Pad) problem on microchip Al bondpads. A new qualification methodology, OSSD [(Optical, SEM, and Surface and Depth profiling X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)] will be proposed, in which XPS surface analysis is used to check the contamination level of fluorine and carbon on bondpad surfaces instead of Auger analysis. XPS depth profiling analysis will also be used to measure Al oxide thickness instead of TEM analysis. By using OSSD, Al bondpads can be qualified with both reduced costs and shortened turnaround times versus OSAT.
Proceedings Papers
ISTFA2014, ISTFA 2014: Conference Proceedings from the 40th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, 215-217, November 9–13, 2014,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
It is well-known that underetch material, contamination, particle, pinholes and corrosion-induced defects on microchip Al bondpads will cause non-stick on pads (NSOP) issues. In this paper, the authors will further study NSOP problem and introduce one more NSOP failure mechanism due to Cu diffusion caused by poor Ta barrier metal. Based on our failure analysis results, the NSOP issue was not due to the assembly process, but due to the wafer fabrication. The failure mechanism might be that the barrier metal Ta was with pinholes, which caused Cu diffused out to the top Al layer, and then formed the “Bump-like” Cu defects and resulted in NSOP on Al bondpads during assembly process.