Carburizing and induction hardening are two surface heat treatments commonly used to increase wear resistance and fatigue performance of steel parts subject to cyclical torsional loading. It was originally hypothesized that performing an induction surface hardening heat treatment on parts previously carburized could provide further increased fatigue life, however initial torsional fatigue results from previous work indicated the opposite as the as-carburized conditions exhibited better torsional fatigue strength than the carburized plus induction surface hardened conditions. The aim of this work is to further elucidate these torsional fatigue results through metallography and material property characterization, namely non-martensitic transformation product (NTMP) analysis, prior austenite grain size (PAGS) analysis, and residual stress vs depth analysis using x-ray diffraction (XRD). A carburizing heat treatment with a case depth of 1.0 or 1.5 mm and an induction hardening heat treatment with a case depth of 0, 2.0, or 3.0 mm were applied to torsional fatigue specimens of 4121 steel modified with 0.84 wt pct Cr. The carburized samples without further induction processing, the 0 mm induction case depth, served as a baseline for comparison. The as-received microstructure of the alloy was a combination of polygonal ferrite and upper bainite with area fractions of approximately 27% and 73% respectively. The only conditions that exhibited NMTP were the as-carburized conditions. These conditions also exhibited larger average PAGS and higher magnitude compressive residual stresses at the surface compared to the carburized plus induction hardened conditions. The compressive residual stresses offer the best explanation for the trends observed in the torsional fatigue results as the conditions with NMTP present and larger PAGS exhibited the best torsional fatigue performance, which is opposite of what has been observed in literature.

Carburizing and induction hardening are two commonly used surface heat treatments that increase fatigue life and surface wear resistance of steels without sacrificing toughness. It is hypothesized that induction hardening following carburizing could yield further increased torsional fatigue performance through reducing the magnitude of the tensile residual stresses at the carburizing case-core interface. If successful, manufacturers could see gains in part performance by combining both established approaches. A carburizing heat treatment with a case depth of 1.0 or 1.5 mm and an induction hardening heat treatment with a case depth of 0, 2.0, or 3.0 mm were applied to torsional fatigue specimens of 4121 steel modified with 0.84 wt pct Cr. The carburized samples without further induction processing, the 0 mm induction case depth, served as a baseline for comparison. The as-received microstructure of the alloy was a combination of polygonal ferrite and upper bainite with area fractions of approximately 27% and 73% respectively. The case microstructure of the heat-treated conditions was primarily tempered martensite and transitioned to a bainitic microstructure around the deepest overall case depth. Material property characterization consisted of radial cross-sectional hardness testing and torsional fatigue testing. The hardness profiles confirmed that the designed case depths were achieved for all conditions. Torsional fatigue testing was conducted using a Satec SF-1U Universal Fatigue Tester. Of the six tested conditions, the condition with the deepest case depths, i.e. carburized to 1.5 mm and induction hardened to 3.0 mm, was expected to have the greatest increase in fatigue performance. However, initial fatigue results potentially indicate the opposite effect as the non-induction hardened samples exhibited longer fatigue lives on average.