Integrated circuit (IC) de-processing is a crucial step in failure analysis (FA) for defect validation and root cause identification. The commonly used FA de-processing technique is top-down delayering, this is because of faster and easier for sample preparation. However, backside de-processing is occasionally necessary for fault isolation, better root cause understanding, and formulating the failing mechanism such as gate oxide defects, front-end of line (FEOL) defects, back-end of line (BEOL) vertical shorts, high power Ga-N on Silicon (Si) substrate device, etc. This paper introduces an innovative backside de-processing method for ICs utilizing laser ablation by employing a commercial laser decapsulation system. We thin the backside Si substrate via laser ablation and subsequent chemical etching, revealing FEOL defects. Experimental results demonstrate the method's efficiency, offering enhanced sample handling and reduced preparation time. The proposed backside laser de-processing technique proves to be a superior choice compared to conventional methods in terms of success rate, de-processing speed, and cost-effectiveness. This research contributes to advancing FA methodologies by introducing an innovative approach for backside physical FA applications, opening new possibilities for efficient and accurate IC analysis.

This paper illustrated the beauty of AFP nanoprobing as the critical failure analysis tool in resolving the one-time programmable (OTP) non-volatile memory data retention failures through electrical simulation in wafer fabrication. Layout analysis, electrical simulation using Meilke’s method, UV erase methodology (to differentiate between mobile ion Meilke’s method contamination and charge trap centers) and a few other FA approaches were employed to determine the different root causes in the three OTP failure case detailed in this paper.. These include SiN trap center issue, poly stringers and abnormal layer at the initial CESL (Contact etch stop layer) nitride. This paper placed a strong emphasis on systematic problem solving approach, deep dive and use of right FA approach/tool that are essentially critical to FA analysts in wafer foundry since there is always minimal available data provided. It would serve as a good reference to wafer Fab that encountered such issue.

This paper discussed on how the importance of failure analysis to identify the root cause and mechanism that resulted in the MEMS failure. The defect seen was either directly on the MEMS caps or the CMOS integrated chip in wafer fabrication. Two case studies were highlighted in the discussion to demonstrate how the FA procedures that the analysts had adopted in order to narrow down to the defect site successfully on MEMS cap as well as on CMOS chip on MEMS package units. Besides the use of electrical fault isolation tool/technique such as TIVA for defect localization, a new physical deprocessing approach based on the cutting method was performed on the MEMS package unit in order to separate the MEMS from the Si Cap. This approach would definitely help to prevent the introduction of particles and artifacts during the PFA that could mislead the FA analyst into wrong data interpretation. Other FA tool such as SEM inspection to observe the physical defect and Auger analysis to identify the elements in the defect during the course of analysis were also documented in this paper.

This paper placed a strong emphasis on the importance of applying Systematic Problem Solving approach, deep dive and use of right/appropriate FA approach/tools that are essentially critical to FA analysts to understand the “real” root cause. A case of low yield with polar failing pattern was seen and matched well with the Al Pad etch E chuck configuration. Customer also reported of passivation crack issue at the solder bumps. All these evidences suggested the root cause was related to wafer fabrication issue. However, it was through a strong “inquisitive” mindset coupled with the essence of such strong problem solving approach that led to uncover the actual root cause. Although customer test condition was not able to be duplicated due to limited information available in foundry industry, a four point probing alternative method was engaged to overcome this limitation. Unlike typical case, the AlOx thickness was comparable for bad and good dies. Further in depth analysis subsequently revealed the higher O content in the AlOx for the bad dies that was the real culprit for the higher bump resistance. This paper highlights the job of FA analyst is not simply finding defect but also plays a catalyst role in root cause/failure mechanism understanding by providing supporting FA evidence (electrically / physically) to Fab. It would serve as a good reference to wafer Fab that encountered such issue.

This paper places a strong emphasis on the importance of applying Systematic Problem Solving approach and use of appropriate FA methods and tools to understand the “real” failure root cause. A case of wafer center cluster RAM fail due to systematic missing Cu was studied. It was through a strong “inquisitive” mindset coupled with deep dive problem solving that lead to uncover the actual root cause of large Cu voids. The missing Cu was due to large Cu void induced by galvanic effects from the faster removal rate during Cu CMP and subsequently resulted in missing Cu. This highlights that the FA analyst’s mission is not simply to find defects but also play a catalyst role in root cause/failure mechanism understanding by providing supporting FA evidence (electrically/ physically) to Fab.

With the rapid development of semiconductor manufacturing technologies, IC devices evolve to smaller feature sizes and higher densities, and thus the task of performing successful failure analysis (FA) is becoming increasingly difficult. Device miniaturization often requires high spatial resolution fault isolation and physical analysis [1]. To cater to the shrinking of devices, extensive process improvements have been conducted at the front-end-of-line (FEOL) structures. As a result, among the numerous types of defects leading to chip failure, FEOL defects are becoming more common for devices of advanced tech nodes [2]. Therefore, it becomes more complexity and difficulty on searching the physical defect. Sample preparation is a key activity in material and failure analysis. In order to image small structures or defects it is often necessary to remove excess material or layers hiding the feature of interest. Removing selected layers to isolate a structure is called delayering. It can be accomplished by chemical etching using liquid or plasma chemistry, or by mechanical means, by polishing off each unwanted layer.

This paper illustrated the beauty of AFP nano-probing as the critical failure analysis tool in localizing new product design weakness. A 40nm case of HTOL Pin Leakage due to Source/Drain punch-through at a systematic location was discussed. The root cause and mechanism was due to VDS overdrive testing issue. This paper placed a strong emphasis on systematic problem solving approach, deep dive and use of right FA approach/tool that are essentially critical to FA analysts in wafer foundry since there is always minimal available data provided. It would serve as a good reference to wafer Fab that encountered such issue.

With the evolution of advanced process technology, failure analysis is becoming much more challenging and difficult particularly with an increase in more erratic defect types arising from non-visual failure mechanisms. Conventional FA techniques work well in failure analysis on defectively related issue. However, for soft defect localization such as S/D leakage or short due to design related, it may not be simple to identify it. AFP and its applications have been successfully engaged to overcome such shortcoming, In this paper, two case studies on systematic issues due to soft failures were discussed to illustrate the AFP critical role in current failure analysis field on these areas. In other words, these two case studies will demonstrate how Atomic Force Probing combined with Scanning Capacitance Microscopy were used to characterize failing transistors in non-volatile memory, identify possible failure mechanisms and enable device/ process engineers to make adjustment on process based on the electrical characterization result. [1]

In this paper, we will describe a low yield case which revealed itself as leakage failures near the wafer edge. A systematic problem solving approach was used based on the application of a variety of FA techniques such as electrical curve tracing, Spreading Resistance Probing (SRP), Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS), and Chemical Analysis coupled with extensive Fab investigations. These techniques transformed an invisible defect into a visible one, leading to a full resolution of the issue with good understanding of the failure mechanism and the root cause. We will show that the wafer edge leakage was the result of N-type contamination of the substrate due to Phosphorus outgassing from the V-ring during the high temperature Argon anneal process.

In this paper, a low yield case relating to a systematic array of failures in a ring pattern due to ADC_PLL failures on low yielding wafers will be studied. A systematic problem solving process based on the application of a variety of FA techniques such as TIVA, AFP current imaging, layout path tracing, PVC and XTEM together with Fab investigation is used to understand the root cause as well as failure mechanism proposed. This process is particularly critical in a wafer foundry in which there is minimal available data on the test condition setup to duplicate the exact failure. The ring pattern was due to systematically open via as a result of polymer built-up from plasma de-chuck issue. It would serve as a good reference for a wafer Fab that encounters such an issue.