Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Subjects
Article Type
Volume Subject Area
Date
Availability
1-2 of 2
Alexander Teverovsky
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Proceedings Papers
ISTFA2000, ISTFA 2000: Conference Proceedings from the 26th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, 425-434, November 12–16, 2000,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
Metallurgically bonded, glass-bodied DO-35 power rectifier diodes were electrically overstressed by applying forward and reverse current pulses. Forward current pulses varied from 0.1 to 3 ms with current amplitudes varying from 200 to 1000 A were applied to one group of diodes. Reverse bias current pulses in the microsecond range with amplitudes from 2 to 400 mA (above breakdown voltage) were applied to another group. A small-step cross sectioning in combination with electrical probing, light emission microscopy, liquid crystal technique, and chemical staining were used to reveal and compare damage in three groups of diodes: two overstressed groups and the third group which had failed during burn-in electrical testing. Failure mechanisms and peculiarities of damage created in these diodes and several case histories related to different types of diodes are discussed.
Proceedings Papers
ISTFA1999, ISTFA 1999: Conference Proceedings from the 25th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, 285-292, November 14–18, 1999,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
Low-pressure conditions, as experienced in space applications, are considered benign for many electronic components. However, for switching devices the probability of failure may be significantly greater than at normal atmospheric pressure due to arcing-at-break processes. This study was stimulated by a relay failure in a 60-V power bus in a spacecraft module, and it was intended to analyze failure modes and the probability of their occurring under lowpressure conditions. The effects of gas pressure, power bus voltage, and load current on arc duration and probability of arc flashover have been investigated. It was shown that arc duration mostly depends on switching power and gas pressure, significantly increasing when power is rising and pressure is decreasing. Failure analysis indicated two major mechanisms in low-pressure conditions: (1) contact damage (excessive erosion and/or microwelding) and (2) arc flashover to a grounded case and/or grounded coil post. For a relay operating in a vacuum, the effect of leak rate on the time to failure at low-pressure conditions is discussed.