A new thermal spray technology has been proposed. Called Electrical Chemical Thermal Spray (ETCS), it combines plasma energy with the combustion gases of solid propellants to heat and accelerate particulate materials. The hybrid technology promises new degrees of freedom in materials processing over the conventional thermal spray processes by allowing thermal energy transfer to the particles and particle accelerations to be optimized separately. Experimental coatings were formed using a prototype system made from a converted ½” plasma gun fueled with double-base solid propellants to explore this novel concept. The prototype test-facility equipment was limited to single-shot mode. Examination of the coatings formed, and conceptual analysis by analogy to conventional technologies was used to assess the capabilities and limitations of the hybrid process. Impressive in-flight powder velocities of 1100 m/s were reached, with deposition yield efficiencies of 60 - 85% achieved for WC-Co coatings after first round of optimization. However despite the ability to deposit single-shot carbide and metallic coatings with thickness exceeding 200 µm. chemical degradation and extensive cracking combined to limit attractiveness of coatings as compared to those produced using commercial technologies. Unlike the oxidation effects with atmospheric plasma spray and the various low-velocity flame-spraying technologies, chemical degradation in the prototype ETCS was the result of interaction between the gases produced from the combustion of the propellant and the coating material. It is seen that the organic, nitrocellulose based solid propellants are inherently unsuitable for spraying reactive material. With suitable fuels however, it is believed that the inherent advantages of high throughput, versatility and low labour requirements are such that ETCS will have commercial advantages for the coating of large structures.

Frequent reporting of microhardness data for thermal spray coatings testifies to the widespread use of this technique for coatings characterization. However, inadequate reporting of microhardness procedures makes comparisons between published coatings hardness statistics difficult and it appears that both microhardness in general and its significance to characterizing thermal spray coatings in particular, are poorly understood. This paper demonstrates that though microindentation technique is a useful laboratory procedure that can be used for coatings optimization, research and quality control purposes, poor understanding often leads to worthless data and thus to erroneous conclusions. A high quality WC-12%Co coating supplied by Sulzer Metco was hardness tested on both the polished cross-section and plane surface of the coating. Contributions to the variance in results obtained and sources of significant errors are discussed and conclusions are drawn regarding the methodology and suitability of hardness testing for characterizing thermal spray coatings. The limits in repeatability and reproducibility of Vickers microhardness data for hard metal thermal spray coatings are discussed. The necessity for rigorous statistical procedures of data analysis is demonstrated. It is suggested that the technique is inherently unsuitable for characterizing hard thermal spray coatings due to poor intrinsic reproducibility.