Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Subjects
Article Type
Volume Subject Area
Date
Availability
1-1 of 1
Probabilistic risk assessments
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Proceedings Papers
ISTFA2021, ISTFA 2021: Conference Proceedings from the 47th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, 263-268, October 31–November 4, 2021,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
There are many wafer level tests, such as Fail Bit Count (FBC), where conventional statistical analysis methods are inadequate because the associated data do not follow a normal distribution. This paper introduces a statistical failure analysis technique that does not rely on location and scale parameters and is thus able to handle such cases. It describes the math on which the method is based and explains how to determine effect size (ES) using the quantile comparison equivalence criteria (QCEC) and a statistical parameter, called the center of dispersion (CoD), that distinguishes between center difference and dispersion difference. It also includes a case study showing how the new method is used to assess the effect of a process change on dynamic random access memory test data and how it compares in terms of accuracy with conventional statistical techniques.