Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Subjects
Article Type
Volume Subject Area
Date
Availability
1-1 of 1
Photomasking
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Proceedings Papers
ISTFA1997, ISTFA 1997: Conference Proceedings from the 23rd International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, 85-87, October 27–31, 1997,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
Silicon planar phototransistors in hermetic pig-tail metallic package for airborne system application failed the acceptance test because of low responsivity. No significant difference between the electrical characteristics of good and defective devices could be detected by systematic investigation of focusing lens, anti-reflecting coating, optical alignment, and by internal electrical microprobing. EBIC inspection instead revealed that all defective phototransistors were affected by an anomalous region with a very high photo-carrier generation rate. This effect was produced by the misalignment of the emitter metallization which partially exposed the emitter-base junction. Partial exposition of the emitter diffusion to impinging radiation generates an induced photocurrent in the emitter-base junction which has opposite direction with respect to the photocurrent induced in the base-collector junction. The extra photocurrent in the base-emitter junction reduces the emitter-base forward polarization and, as direct consequence, the phototransistor responsivity is lower.