In this study, a 65nm product level low yield case has been investigated and its failure mechanism was identified. Root cause analysis was discussed and concluded. The product has been hit with ATPG failure with a unique wafer map signature - a butterfly pattern. Tools commonality and timeframe analysis show that the highly suspected process is the Metal1 Cu seed PVD step. To understand the failure mechanism and its root cause, product level FA was needed. However due to its functional failure property, the conventional EFA is not applicable in this case. Instead GDS study was performed to isolate the failure sites. Subsequently physical FA analysis was carried out at the identified sites to reveal its failure mechanism. Metal1 void was observed on the sidewall of the metal1. Meanwhile, a very interesting phenomenon was observed. If die was selected on the left part of the butterfly pattern, the void would be on the right side sidewall of the metal. If the die was selected on the right part, the void would be on the left side sidewall of the metal1. All of the voids were towards wafer center. After in-depth study of the PVD process, we suspect the pass die could also have void. These voids must be also towards wafer center. Subsequent PFA on good unit confirmed our suspect. The more detailed mechanism of the void formation was discussed and evidences supporting our analysis are to be presented in the paper. Nevertheless, the butterfly pattern is still a question in our mind. After in-depth analysis, we found the voids formation was associated with Metal1 orientation. Because of the horizontal orientation of Metal1, if the void happens it should locate in the end of the metal line in the butterfly area. While the majority of Via1/contact are stand on the line end, so the open Via1/contact failure will happen. For the die out of the butterfly area, the majority of the void locates in the sidewall of the metal line center. The majority Via1/contact are not stand in the center of the metal line center, of no Via1/contact open happen. But it is still has reliability concern. Much more detailed and in-depth mechanism is investigated in the paper. Moreover, improvement is also touched on. Systematic problem solving method is employed in this case. It is good reference for same kinds of failure analysis.

Sub-nanometer focused inert gas ions derived from a Gas Field Ion Source (GFIS) contain properties that can improve the dimensional and conductivity characteristics of ion beam deposited platinum circuit edit wiring. The following paper, presents ion interaction simulations that help provide insight into the factors which determine the ultimate wire width, resistivity, and metal deposition rates. An experimental result that has aided in the understanding of the primary wire width limiting mechanism is also presented. Finally, a description of the ion beam and precursor properties used for the platinum deposition is provided, a long with a discussion of the wire resistivity measurement technique and challenges. To conclude, the prospects for GFIS ion induced dielectric and metal deposition for circuit edit and nanofabrication applications are discussed.

This paper describes a novel method of sample preparation for Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) analysis, particularly a technique for photoresist sample preparation for TEM analysis. In the analysis of an ultra large scale integrated (ULSI) circuit, the profile images of a ULSI circuit sample are crucial. In order to identify the tiny features of modern semiconductor devices clearly, TEMs are used because of their high spatial resolution. However, TEM analysis is not available for photoresist material, especially for a patterned photoresist layer, due to the difficulty in specimen preparation and its susceptibility to electron beam damage during TEM analysis. A critical step in preparing this type of TEM specimens is to deposit a conductive layer and a dielectric layer upon the patterned phototresist by a physical vapor deposition process at room temperature first, then followed by a focus ion beam (FIB) process. The exact profile of the patterned photoresist is kept, during specimen preparation and TEM analysis, by this modified method. Precise dimension measurements are then possible.