Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Article Type
Volume Subject Area
Date
Availability
1-2 of 2
Todd R. McDonald
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Proceedings Papers
ISTFA2008, ISTFA 2008: Conference Proceedings from the 34th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, 242-244, November 2–6, 2008,
Abstract
PDF
Abstract Today’s high volume FA labs are constantly looking for ways to improve the data to customer cycle. Current dye & pull sample preparation materials and methods have some time to completion requirements that cannot be avoided without compromising data. This paper demonstrates that significant improvements in data cycle time and quality can be realized by using a combination of the latest UV cure adhesives, masks, and complimentary equipment such as LED cure lights and gantry dispensing robots.
Proceedings Papers
ISTFA2006, ISTFA 2006: Conference Proceedings from the 32nd International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, 202-203, November 12–16, 2006,
Abstract
PDF
Abstract Existing tools used by industry to manually remove PCB components for disbond type mapping or crack area measurement present significant ergonomic and process quality concerns. The most common tool designs often cause damage to some of the solder joints on components during pull, and frequently, operators using these designs report safety concerns. This paper evaluates these concerns and proposes a design solution that eliminates them. With a manual T-handle pull tool system introduced here, there is no prying, lever or angular force applied to remove the component. The pull tool rotates using vertical threads to apply vertical removal force. It demonstrates a reduction in manual operator force by an average of 93% compared to the cam lobe lever design. Additionally, the pull tool reduces bending of pull bolts and angular pull direction that may interfere with availability and interpretation of subsequent disbond data.