Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Subjects
Article Type
Volume Subject Area
Date
Availability
1-7 of 7
G.R. Low
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Proceedings Papers
ISTFA2014, ISTFA 2014: Conference Proceedings from the 40th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, 196-201, November 9–13, 2014,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
In this work, we present two case studies on the utilization of advanced nanoprobing on 20nm logic devices at contact layer to identify the root cause of scan logic failures. In both cases, conventional failure analysis followed by inspection of passive voltage contrast (PVC) failed to identify any abnormality in the devices. Technology advancement makes identifying failure mechanisms increasingly more challenging using conventional methods of physical failure analysis (PFA). Almost all PFA cases for 20nm technology node devices and beyond require Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) analysis. Before TEM analysis can be performed, fault isolation is required to correctly determine the precise failing location. Isolated transistor probing was performed on the suspected logic NMOS and PMOS transistors to identify the failing transistors for TEM analysis. In this paper, nanoprobing was used to isolate the failing transistor of a logic cell. Nanoprobing revealed anomalies between the drain and bulk junction which was found to be due to contact gouging of different severities.
Proceedings Papers
ISTFA2014, ISTFA 2014: Conference Proceedings from the 40th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, 268-273, November 9–13, 2014,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
With technology scaling of semiconductor devices and further growth of the integrated circuit (IC) design and function complexity, it is necessary to increase the number of transistors in IC’s chip, layer stacks, and process steps. The last few metal layers of Back End Of Line (BEOL) are usually very thick metal lines (>4μm thickness) and protected with hard Silicon Dioxide (SiO2) material that is formed from (TetraEthyl OrthoSilicate) TEOS as Inter-Metal Dielectric (IMD). In order to perform physical failure analysis (PFA) on the logic or memory, the top thick metal layers must be removed. It is time-consuming to deprocess those thick metal and IMD layers using conventional PFA workflows. In this paper, the Fast Laser Deprocessing Technique (FLDT) is proposed to remove the BEOL thick and stubborn metal layers for memory PFA. The proposed FLDT is a cost-effective and quick way to deprocess a sample for defect identification in PFA.
Proceedings Papers
ISTFA2014, ISTFA 2014: Conference Proceedings from the 40th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, 469-473, November 9–13, 2014,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
With continuous scaling of CMOS device dimensions, sample preparation for Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) analysis becomes increasingly important and challenging as the required sample thickness is less than several tens of nanometers. This paper studies the protection materials for FIB milling to increase the success rate of ex-situ ‘lift-out’ TEM sample preparation on 14nm Fin-Field Effect Transistor (FinFET).
Proceedings Papers
ISTFA2013, ISTFA 2013: Conference Proceedings from the 39th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, 563-568, November 3–7, 2013,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
With the scaling of semiconductor devices to nanometer range, ensuring surface uniformity over a large area while performing top down physical delayering has become a greater challenge. In this paper, the application of laser deprocessing technique (LDT) to achieve better surface uniformity as well as for fast deprocessing of sample for defect identification in nanoscale devices are discussed. The proposed laser deprocess technique is a cost-effective and quick way to deprocess sample for defect identification and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) analysis.
Proceedings Papers
ISTFA2013, ISTFA 2013: Conference Proceedings from the 39th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, 569-575, November 3–7, 2013,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
Top-down, layer-by-layer de-layering inspection with a mechanical polisher and serial cross-sectional Focused Ion Beam (XFIB) slicing are two common approaches for physical failure analysis (PFA). This paper uses XFIB to perform top-down, layer-by-layer de-layering followed by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) inspection. The advantage of the FIB-SEM de-layering technique over mechanical de-layering is better control of the de-layering process. Combining the precise milling capability of the FIB with the real-time imaging capability of the SEM enables the operator to observe the de-layering as it progresses, minimizing the likelihood of removing either too much or too little material. Furthermore, real time SEM view during top-down XFIB de-layering is able to provide a better understanding of how the defects are formed and these findings could then be feedback to the production line for process improvement.
Proceedings Papers
ISTFA2012, ISTFA 2012: Conference Proceedings from the 38th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, 406-410, November 11–15, 2012,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
With the scaling down of semiconductor devices to nanometer range, fault isolation and physical failure analysis (PFA) have become more challenging. In this paper, different types of fault isolation techniques to identify gross short failures in nanoscale devices are discussed. The proposed cut/deprocess and microprobe/bench technique is an economical and simple way of identifying low resistance gross short failures.
Proceedings Papers
ISTFA2010, ISTFA 2010: Conference Proceedings from the 36th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, 239-242, November 14–18, 2010,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
Electrical Test (ET) structures are used to monitor the health and yield of a process line. With the scaling down of semiconductor devices to nanometer ranges, the number of metal lines and vias increase. In order to simulate the electrical performance of devices and to increase the sensitivity for line health check, ET structures are designed to be more complicated with a larger area. Hence, fault isolation and failure analysis become more challenging. In this paper, the combined technique of Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) Passive Voltage Contrast (PVC), Nanoprobing technique, and Divide and Conquer Method (DCM) are proposed to locate open failure and high resistance failure in an ET via chain.