Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Article Type
Volume Subject Area
Date
Availability
1-1 of 1
C.H. Chen
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Proceedings Papers
ISTFA2004, ISTFA 2004: Conference Proceedings from the 30th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, 487-490, November 14–18, 2004,
Abstract
PDF
Abstract The passive voltage contrast (PVC) in this experiment was widely used to detect open/short issues for most failure analyses. However, most of back-end particles were visible, but front-end particles were not. And sometimes only used PVC image, the failure mechanism was un-imaginable. As a result, we needed to collect some electrical data to explain complex PVC image, before physical failure analysis (PFA) was started. This paper shows how to use the scanning probe microscope (SPM) tool to make up PVC method and overcome the physical failure analysis challenge. From our experiment, the C-AFM could provide more information of the defect type and give faster feedback to production lines.