Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Subjects
Article Type
Volume Subject Area
Date
Availability
1-11 of 11
Austenitizing
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Proceedings Papers
IFHTSE2024, IFHTSE 2024: Proceedings of the 29th International Federation for Heat Treatment and Surface Engineering World Congress, 132-138, September 30–October 3, 2024,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
Heat treatment of steels is a process of modifying the mechanical properties by solid-state phase transformations or microstructural changes through heating and cooling. The material volume changes with phase transformations, which is one of the main sources of distortion. The thermal stress also contributes to the distortion, and its effect increases with solidstate phase transformations, as the material stays in the plastic deformation field due to the TRIP effect. With the basic understanding described above, the sources of distortion from a quench hardening process can be categorized as: 1) nonuniform austenitizing transformation during heating, 2) nonuniform austenite decomposing transformations to ferrite, pearlite, bainite or martensite during quenching, 3) adding of carbon or nitrogen to the material, and forming carbides or nitrides during carburizing or nitriding, 4) coarsening of carbide in tempered martensite during tempering, 5) stress relaxation from the initial state, 6) thermal stress caused by temperature gradient, and 7) nonhomogeneous material conditions, etc. With the help of computer modeling, the causes of distortion by these sources are analyzed and quantified independently. In this article, a series of modeling case studies are used to simulate the specific heat treatment process steps. Solutions for controlling and reducing distortion are proposed and validated from the modeling aspect. A thinwalled part with various wall section thickness is used to demonstrate the effectiveness of stepped heating on distortion caused by austenitizing. A patented gas quenching process is used to demonstrate the controlling of distortion with martensitic transformation for high temperature tempering steels. The effect of adding carbon to austenite on size change during carburizing is quantified by modeling, and the distortion can be compensated by adjusting the heat treat part size.
Proceedings Papers
HT 2021, Heat Treat 2021: Proceedings from the 31st Heat Treating Society Conference and Exposition, 17-22, September 14–16, 2021,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
Powder metallurgy (PM) is the fabrication process of compacting metal powders to shape and sintering these compacts to yield the final material’s properties. The PM compaction process allows for complex geometries to be formed that would normally lead to long and expensive machining processes from wrought steels. Special alloy selection can allow for hardening of the microstructure during the sintering procedure. The sinter hardened (SH) alloys exhibit good mechanical properties along with good hardenability and dimensional stability and may be a suitable replacement for wrought steels where low distortion from heat treatment or microstructural control is required. In this study, it was found for a complex geometry coupler application, a SH alloy could successfully replace an austenitizing heat treatment process with a low carbon steel. The low carbon steel was found to have micro heterogeneities from heat treatment that lead to premature failure in the application. Dimensional distortion and production variance were also of concern with the low carbon steel. The SH material demonstrated acceptable physical properties, hardness and microstructural uniformity to solve the concerns associated with processing of the low carbon steel coupler. Post processing optimization also added to the life performance of the coupler by tailoring the final microstructure to mating components.
Proceedings Papers
HT 2021, Heat Treat 2021: Proceedings from the 31st Heat Treating Society Conference and Exposition, 125-131, September 14–16, 2021,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
A micro-alloyed 1045 steel was commercially rolled into 54 mm diameter bars by conventional hot rolling at 1000 °C and by lower temperature thermomechanical rolling at 800 °C. The lower rolling temperature refined the ferrite-pearlite microstructure and influenced the microstructural response to rapid heating at 200 °C·s -1 , a rate that is commonly encountered during single shot induction heating for case hardening. Specimens of both materials were rapidly heated to increasing temperatures in a dilatometer to determine the A c1 and A c3 transformation temperatures. Microscopy was used to characterize the dissolution of ferrite and cementite. Continuous cooling transformation (CCT) diagrams were developed for rapid austenitizing temperatures 25 °C above the A c3 determined by dilatometry. Dilatometry and microstructure evaluation along with hardness tests showed that thermomechanical rolling reduced the austenite grain size and lowered the heating temperature needed to dissolve the ferrite. With complete austenitization at 25 °C above the A c3 there was little effect on the CCT behavior.
Proceedings Papers
HT2015, Heat Treat 2015: Proceedings from the 28th Heat Treating Society Conference, 41-47, October 20–22, 2015,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
Austempering heat treatments of steels and cast irons are usually performed using salt bath quenching followed by isothermal transformation of austenite to bainite or ausferrite. High Pressure Gas Quenching (HPGQ) at 1-4 MPa gas pressures is increasingly used to replace oil quenching, but may also be used for austempering. However, to obtain sufficient heat transfer high gas speeds >25 m/s are required. Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP) is widely used for densifying castings and powder-based materials. Recent equipment developments enable Uniform Rapid Quenching (URQ) under 200 MPa pressure and 0.3 m/s speed, providing uniform cooling. Superplastic conditions during austenitization and initially during URQ reduce residual stresses and eliminate internal porosity in castings and PM materials. Hardenability is increased due to stabilization of the close-packed austenite. The inherent freedom provided by HIP to select optimum levels and rates for temperatures and pressures has been shown to improve mechanical properties and reduce process duration.
Proceedings Papers
HT2015, Heat Treat 2015: Proceedings from the 28th Heat Treating Society Conference, 64-70, October 20–22, 2015,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
Around 1970 it was discovered that quenching AISI 4340 steel from 1200 °C leads to much higher fracture toughness, in the as quenched state, than by conventional austenitizing at 870 °C. Further researches have ascertained that the apparent toughness increase is limited to fracture toughness tests (KIC), whereas Charpy-V impact tests do not show any betterment due to high temperature austenitizing, in respect to conventional heat-treating. Various explanations of these contradicting results were given on the basis of the then existing theories. It was further ascertained that the betterment of fracture toughness was limited upon tempering to a maximum temperature of 250 °C, making it useless for most applications. The puzzling phenomenon has been recently reconsidered for the validation of new Blunt Notch Brittle Finite Fracture Mechanics theories. Results are given and possible future applications to industrial cases presented.
Proceedings Papers
HT2015, Heat Treat 2015: Proceedings from the 28th Heat Treating Society Conference, 146-153, October 20–22, 2015,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
M-42 is Molybdenum-series high speed steel used as a cutting tool material because of its hot hardness and toughness properties. With the better hot hardness and wear resistance, M-42 is one of the most widely used tool materials for cutting tools. These Molybdenum steels are heat treated conventionally in four steps viz., preheating, austenitizing, quenching along with two stages of tempering. The main step in heat treatment, austenitizing is done with the aid of salt bath furnace by heating the tool steel to the austenitizing temperature (1260°C) with three stages of preheating. This method is often a time consuming process with most of the time and energy utilized for the achievement of the required temperature. This study deals with the rapid heat treatment of the aforementioned M-42 steel samples by the action of microwaves from a hybrid microwave furnace. The quenching is done as of in a conventional method using a neutral salt bath maintained at a temperature of 550 °C. Comparison between the rapidly heat treated specimen and the conventionally heat treated specimen With similar dimensions is carried out. The tempering processes for both the specimens were carried out conventionally. Mechanical properties such as hardness, microstructure, etc., are compared between the conventional and the rapid heat treated specimens. Scanning electron microscopy was also taken to study the grain refinement of the microwave heat treated steel specimen at a higher magnification. The comparison between the properties and the microstructure revealed minute changes in mechanical properties of the rapid heat treated specimen and also resulted in the marked drop of the heating time and the energy saving thereby reducing the costs incurred for the heat treatment process.
Proceedings Papers
HT2015, Heat Treat 2015: Proceedings from the 28th Heat Treating Society Conference, 368-372, October 20–22, 2015,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
Grain growth during heat treatment can affect mechanical properties. A large grain size can result in a lower strength and susceptibility to brittle failure. In order to control the prior austenite grain size, the effect of Austenitizing temperatures and holding times on the grain size and hardness in 4140 steel was experimentally investigated. Samples were heat treated at 900, 1000, and 1100 °C, and held for 1, 4, and 9 hours. After austenitizing, samples were cooled in the furnace to 850 °C before they were quenched in water at room temperature. Each sample was cut, mounted, and polished. Rockwell hardness and microhardness tests were performed on each sample. A Picric etch was used for grain size analysis. The grain size was measured following the E112 standard test method. It was found that the prior austenite grain size increased with temperature and time according to the standard grain growth model. It was also found that the as-quenched hardness decreased with an increase in grain size.
Proceedings Papers
HT2015, Heat Treat 2015: Proceedings from the 28th Heat Treating Society Conference, 394-397, October 20–22, 2015,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
The potential for improving mechanical properties of steels via thermal processing (e.g. austenization and rapid quenching) through modified phase equilibria in the presence of a high magnetic field has been the subject of numerous recent works [1,2]. In this study, torsional fatigue performance of case-carburized SAE 8620 re-austenitized and quenched inside of a 9 Tesla, 5” diameter superconducting magnet is reviewed. Conventional atmosphere furnace carburized hardened and tempered, and in-situ magnetic field re-hardened and tempered material (Induction Thermo-Magnetic Processing, or “ITMP”) was subjected to fully-reversed torsional loading. Both Special Bar Quality (SBQ) bar and forged SBQ bar steel in carburized conditions were heat treated and mechanically tested. There was no measurable difference in fatigue behavior for either condition when comparing conventionally heat-treated and ITMP re-hardened populations.
Proceedings Papers
HT2015, Heat Treat 2015: Proceedings from the 28th Heat Treating Society Conference, 431-435, October 20–22, 2015,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
A precipitation hardenable semi-austenitic stainless steel AISI 632 grade was austenitized according to industrial specifications and thereafter subjected to isothermal treatment at sub-zero Celsius temperatures. During treatment, austenite transformed to martensite. The isothermal austenite-to-martensite transformation was monitored in situ by magnetometry and data was used to sketch a TTT diagram for transformation. As an alternative treatment, after austenitization the material was immersed in boiling nitrogen and up-quenched to room temperature by immersion in water prior to be subjected to isothermal treatment. Magnetometry showed that the additional thermal step in boiling nitrogen yields a minor increment of the fraction of martensite, but has a noteworthy accelerating effect on the transformation kinetics, which more pronounced when the isothermal holding is performed at a higher temperature. Data is interpreted in terms of instantaneous nucleation of martensite during cooling followed by time dependent growth during isothermal holding.
Proceedings Papers
HT2015, Heat Treat 2015: Proceedings from the 28th Heat Treating Society Conference, 499-503, October 20–22, 2015,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
Developing heat treat systems and control plans that produce consistent direct harden (quench and temper) results with a high percent martensite and the corresponding proper mechanical properties is challenging for large components or large batch sizes. In this study, large section bars in alloys suitable for water quenching were austenitized and quenched under controlled flow conditions. The bars were primarily examined by several as-quenched hardness versus depth traverses in order to be sure localized non-martensitic regions (soft areas) would be detected. The tests allowed for some key insights into defining the adequacy of direct harden water quench systems, including the idea of agitation thresholds required for each alloy grade or hardenability level to prevent soft spots (spotty hardening) on large section steel components.
Proceedings Papers
HT2015, Heat Treat 2015: Proceedings from the 28th Heat Treating Society Conference, 625-630, October 20–22, 2015,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
A study was conducted on a set of H13 steels to enhance their performance as matrices and pins. The steels were austenitized in a high-pressure vacuum furnace at 1015 °C for 180 minutes, followed by nitrogen quenching in a high vacuum (2 bar). Two tempering treatments were applied: one at 540 °C and another at 580 °C, each for 180 minutes, with subsequent nitrogen cooling to room temperature. The nitrocarburizing process was carried out in a liquid bath salt furnace at 580 °C for varying durations of 45, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 minutes to assess the impact of treatment time on the quality of the nitrocarburizing layer. Post quenching and tempering, the steels exhibited hardness values ranging from 550 to 570 HV. After nitrocarburizing, the surface hardness increased to between 740 and 810 HV, with a nitrocarburizing layer thickness of less than 14 μm. The microstructural evolution of the compound layer was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction. The characterization revealed a continuous nitrocarburizing ε-Fe 2–3 (C,N) layer. Specimens treated for 45 to 60 minutes demonstrated superior wear performance compared to those treated for 90 to 180 minutes.