Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
web thickness
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Book Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 340 Search Results for
web thickness
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 4 Rib-to web combinations showing reduction of web thickness by refinement of tooling (a) through (d). Sections (e) and (f) illustrate formation of push-through (or “flow-through”) web defect
More
Image
Published: 30 November 2018
Fig. 22 (a)–(d) Rib-to-web combinations showing reduction of web thickness by refinement of tooling. Sections (e) and (f) illustrate formation of push-through (or flow-through) web defect.
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 19 Booster bracket forging of revised design, with minimum web thickness, which eliminated machining. See Example 7. Dimensions in figure given in inches Item Conventional forging (revised) Alloy and temper Aluminum alloy 2014-T6 (a) Mechanical properties (a) (b
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 6 Example of minimum web thickness for different materials and manufacturing processes. Source: Ref 11
More
Image
in Machining, Drilling, and Cutting of Polymer-Matrix Composites
> Engineered Materials Handbook Desk Edition
Published: 01 November 1995
Fig. 9 Point geometry of drill/reamer cutting tool. A, Web thickness at the point to be 1.5 mm times drill radius. B, Margin width to be 2.2 (±0.05) times drill radius. C, All drill/reamers shall have 0.005 to 0.013 mm/mm uniform back taper starting from intersection of tapered cutting edges
More
Image
in Materials Selection for Failure Prevention
> Analysis and Prevention of Component and Equipment Failures
Published: 30 August 2021
Fig. 6 Example of minimum web thickness for various materials and manufacturing processes. Source: Ref 11
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1997
Fig. 2 For a given process, the minimum web thickness increases with the distance over which material must move. Source: Ref 16
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 6 Suggested average minimum producible web thicknesses, based on (a) transverse distance, W ; (b) ratio of transverse distance to rib height, W : h ;= and (c) plan area of the forging
More
Book Chapter
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 14A
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2005
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v14a.a0004039
EISBN: 978-1-62708-185-6
... that the limits suggested by forging producers and users covering minimum web thicknesses that are producible are helpful in estimating the producibility of a given web thickness in projected-forging design. The article briefly analyzes the web designs of several forgings, including designs for producing flat...
Abstract
The distinction between an unconfined web and a confined web describes the relative ease of flow of metal to flash during forging. This article describes the various types of unconfined and confined web-and-rib combinations encountered in the design of forgings. It informs that the limits suggested by forging producers and users covering minimum web thicknesses that are producible are helpful in estimating the producibility of a given web thickness in projected-forging design. The article briefly analyzes the web designs of several forgings, including designs for producing flat webs, contoured webs, and oblique webs. It provides a checklist to be reviewed by a web designer.
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
-to-width ratio 4:1 (a) Fillet radii 3.1 mm (0.12 in.) (a) Minimum corner radius 1.8 mm (0.07 in.) (a) Minimum web thickness 3.1 mm (0.12 in.) (f) Typical web thickness 3.1, 3.6, and 8.6 mm (0.12, 0.4, and 0.34 in.) Machining allowance (cover) None, net forged (g) Length, width
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
in.) (a) Minimum web thickness (specified) 13 to 17.5 mm (0.50 to 0.69 in.) (a) Typical web thickness (actual) 13 to 17.5 mm (0.50 to 0.69 in.) (e) Machining allowance (cover) 2.5 mm (0.10 in.) min (a) Length and width tolerance +3.3 mm, −0.00 mm (+0.13 in., −0.00 in.) (a) Thickness tolerance
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1989
Fig. 9 Changes in drill design to improve tool life in hand drilling Inconel X-750. Graph shows effects on tool life. All drills were of screw-machine length, with a diameter of 2.5 mm (0.098 in.) and a flute helix angle of 29°. Designs 1 and 2 had a web thickness of 0.5 mm (0.020
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
radius 3.2 mm ( 1 8 in.) Web thickness 3.2 to 4.8 mm ( 1 8 to 3 16 in.) (c) Machining allowance (cover) (approx) 6.4 mm (0.25 in.) (d) Length and width tolerance ±0.8 mm, up to 305 mm (± 1 32 in. up to 12 in.) Thickness tolerance +1.6, −0.8 mm
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
rib height-to-width ratio (rib forged as oblique web) (approx) 17:1 Minimum fillet radius 3.2 mm (0.125 in.) Minimum corner radius 2.36 mm (0.093 in.) Minimum web thickness 2.4 mm (0.094 in.) Machining allowance (cover) None, net forged Length and width tolerance ±0.81 mm (±0.032
More
Image
Published: 30 September 2014
Fig. 36 Profile angle error and toothing alignment error after case hardening as function of web thickness for different ratios of hub thickness and tooth height. Courtesy of H. Mallener. Source: Ref 24
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
width 3 mm (0.12 in.) Maximum rib height-to-width ratio 3.5 to 1 Minimum and typical fillet radii 4 mm (0.16 in.) Minimum and typical corner radii 1.5 mm (0.06 in.) Minimum web thickness 3 mm (0.12 in.) Machining allowance (cover) 2.3 mm (0.09 in.) Length, width and thickness
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
3.1 mm (0.12 in.) (a) Web thickness 3.1 mm (0.12 in.) (a) Maximum web area 39 cm 2 (6 in. 2 ) (a) Machining allowance (cover) None, net forged (i) Length and width tolerance +0.76, −0.51 mm (+0.03, −0.02 in.) (a) Thickness tolerance +0.51, −0.25 mm (+0.02, −0.01
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
3.3 mm (0.13 in.) Maximum rib height-to-width ratio 7 to 1 Minimum fillet radii (horizontal) 2.3 mm (0.09 in.) Minimum corner radii 1.5 mm (0.06 in.) Minimum web thickness 0.20 in. Minimum web area (approx) 15 cm 2 (2.3 in. 2 ) Machining allowance (cover) None; net forged (d
More
1
