Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
wear resistance
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Book Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 1527 Search Results for
wear resistance
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Book Chapter
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 18
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 31 December 2017
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v18.a0006392
EISBN: 978-1-62708-192-4
..., microstructure, surface treatment, and surface finish of steel are also considered. The article discusses the types, wear testing, wear evaluation, and hardness evaluation of abrasive wear. It describes the selection criteria of steels for wear resistance. The article also describes the importance of hardness...
Abstract
This article discusses the classification of wear based on the presence or absence of effective lubricants, namely, lubricated and nonlubricated wear. Variations in ambient temperature, atmosphere, load, and sliding speed, as well as variations in material bulk composition, microstructure, surface treatment, and surface finish of steel are also considered. The article discusses the types, wear testing, wear evaluation, and hardness evaluation of abrasive wear. It describes the selection criteria of steels for wear resistance. The article also describes the importance of hardness and microstructure as factors in resistance to wear. It provides a discussion on the resistance of various materials to wear in specific applications. The wear resistance of austenitic manganese steels is also discussed. The article discusses the applications of phosphate coatings, wear-resistant coatings, and ion implantation. It concludes with information on interaction of wear and corrosion.
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 20
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1997
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v20.a0002474
EISBN: 978-1-62708-194-8
... data gathering data verification fatigue-like wear low-wear computer peripherals lubricants wear design wear resistance WEAR is damage to a solid surface as a result of relative motion between it and another surface or substance ( Ref 1 ). The damage usually results in the progressive loss...
Abstract
Wear is the damage to a solid surface as a result of relative motion between it and another surface or substance. This article discusses the four general ways by which a material can wear, namely, adhesive wear, abrasive wear, fatigue or fatigue-like wear, and corrosive wear. It tabulates the operational classification of wear situations and describes the relationship between wear or wear rate and design parameters. The article reviews the effect of lubrication on wear behavior and the types of lubricants. It illustrates some fundamental criteria that can be applied in the selection of a material for wear applications. The article explains four elements of wear design, such as system analysis, modeling, data gathering, and verification. It concludes with a discussion on the design approach for low-wear computer peripherals.
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 11 Schematic relationship between wear resistance, hardness, and fracture toughness. Source: Ref 6
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 6 Plots of toughness against (a) hot hardness and (b) wear resistance for tool steels. Types underlined indicate shallow-hardened tool steels. The area between the dashed lines in (b) represents average values.
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 10 Relative wear resistance, red (hot) hardness, and toughness of CPM and conventional high-speed tool steels. Source: Crucible Materials Corporation
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 19 Wear resistance of CPM 9V and other P/M and conventional tool steels at indicated hardnesses
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 20 Wear resistance of CPM 10V and other P/M and conventional tool steels at indicated hardnesses
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1989
Fig. 2 Plots of (a) toughness against hot hardness and (b) wear resistance for tool steels. Types underlined indicate shallow-hardened tool steels. The area between the dashed lines in (b) represents average values.
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 15 Effect of molybdenum content on wear resistance of die steels. Data are a cross plot of results shown in Fig. 14 . Source: Ref 25
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 19 Relative wear resistance with respect to hardness of selected chromium steels with 0.55% C. Note the difference between the effect of quenching followed by tempering (solid lines) and the effect of isothermal treatment/quenching to a lower bainitic region (dashed lines). Relative wear
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1989
Fig. 11 Comparagraph showing wear resistance, red (hot) hardness, and toughness of CPM and conventional high-speed tool steels
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1989
Fig. 14 Relative wear resistance of Amborite and DBC50. (a) D3 cool-worked tool steel at 60 HRC. (b) Bearing steel at 60 HRC. (c) M2 high-speed steel at 62 HRC. (d) Hot-worked die steel at 50 HRC. Machining parameters: cutting speed = 120 m/min (395 sfm); depth of cut = 0.25 mm (0.010
More
Image
Published: 01 October 2014
Fig. 6 Abrasive wear resistance versus fracture toughness for a 2.9% C, 19% Cr, 2.4% Mo, 0.9% Cu iron subjected to various heat treatments. Wear resistance expressed as the reciprocal of volume loss (Δ V ). Source: Ref 2
More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 8 Effect of hardness on high-stress wear resistance (measured according to Ref 35 ) and fracture toughness for WC-Co materials. Test condition: 1000 rev/cm 3 . Source: Ref 36
More
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Image
Published: 01 January 1994
Fig. 18 Effect of different 1h heat treatments on the hardness and wear resistance of borohydride-reduced electroless nickel
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1994
Fig. 9 Effect of steel composition (nominal values in wt%) on wear resistance under abrasive wear ( d v = thickness of the boride layer). Test conditions: DP-U grinding tester, SiC paper 220, testing time 6 min. Source: Ref 15 , 16
More
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 3 Effect of boriding on wear resistance (Faville test). (a) 0.45% C (C45) steel borided at 900 °C (1650 °F) for 3 h. (b) Titanium borided at 1000 °C (1830 °F) for 24 h. (c) Tantalum borided at 1000 °C (1830 °F) for 8 h. Source: Ref 13
More
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 4 Effect of steel composition (nominal values in wt%) on wear resistance under abrasive wear ( d v = thickness of the boride layer). Test conditions: DP-U grinding tester, SiC paper 220, testing time 6 min. Source: Ref 8 , 11
More
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 5 Comparison of wear resistance between (a) untreated, (b) carburized, and (c) borided 1018 steel in pin-on-disk wear test. Courtesy of A. Erdemir, Argonne National Laboratory
More
1