1-20 of 1527 Search Results for

wear resistance

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 18
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 31 December 2017
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v18.a0006392
EISBN: 978-1-62708-192-4
..., microstructure, surface treatment, and surface finish of steel are also considered. The article discusses the types, wear testing, wear evaluation, and hardness evaluation of abrasive wear. It describes the selection criteria of steels for wear resistance. The article also describes the importance of hardness...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 20
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1997
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v20.a0002474
EISBN: 978-1-62708-194-8
... data gathering data verification fatigue-like wear low-wear computer peripherals lubricants wear design wear resistance WEAR is damage to a solid surface as a result of relative motion between it and another surface or substance ( Ref 1 ). The damage usually results in the progressive loss...
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 11 Schematic relationship between wear resistance, hardness, and fracture toughness. Source: Ref 6 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 6 Plots of toughness against (a) hot hardness and (b) wear resistance for tool steels. Types underlined indicate shallow-hardened tool steels. The area between the dashed lines in (b) represents average values. More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 10 Relative wear resistance, red (hot) hardness, and toughness of CPM and conventional high-speed tool steels. Source: Crucible Materials Corporation More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 19 Wear resistance of CPM 9V and other P/M and conventional tool steels at indicated hardnesses More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 20 Wear resistance of CPM 10V and other P/M and conventional tool steels at indicated hardnesses More
Image
Published: 01 January 1989
Fig. 2 Plots of (a) toughness against hot hardness and (b) wear resistance for tool steels. Types underlined indicate shallow-hardened tool steels. The area between the dashed lines in (b) represents average values. More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 15 Effect of molybdenum content on wear resistance of die steels. Data are a cross plot of results shown in Fig. 14 . Source: Ref 25 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 19 Relative wear resistance with respect to hardness of selected chromium steels with 0.55% C. Note the difference between the effect of quenching followed by tempering (solid lines) and the effect of isothermal treatment/quenching to a lower bainitic region (dashed lines). Relative wear More
Image
Published: 01 January 1989
Fig. 11 Comparagraph showing wear resistance, red (hot) hardness, and toughness of CPM and conventional high-speed tool steels More
Image
Published: 01 January 1989
Fig. 14 Relative wear resistance of Amborite and DBC50. (a) D3 cool-worked tool steel at 60 HRC. (b) Bearing steel at 60 HRC. (c) M2 high-speed steel at 62 HRC. (d) Hot-worked die steel at 50 HRC. Machining parameters: cutting speed = 120 m/min (395 sfm); depth of cut = 0.25 mm (0.010 More
Image
Published: 01 October 2014
Fig. 6 Abrasive wear resistance versus fracture toughness for a 2.9% C, 19% Cr, 2.4% Mo, 0.9% Cu iron subjected to various heat treatments. Wear resistance expressed as the reciprocal of volume loss (Δ V ). Source: Ref 2 More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 8 Effect of hardness on high-stress wear resistance (measured according to Ref 35 ) and fracture toughness for WC-Co materials. Test condition: 1000 rev/cm 3 . Source: Ref 36 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 1 Wear resistance of pure metals and steel in two-body abrasion. Source: Ref 5 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1994
Fig. 18 Effect of different 1h heat treatments on the hardness and wear resistance of borohydride-reduced electroless nickel More
Image
Published: 01 January 1994
Fig. 9 Effect of steel composition (nominal values in wt%) on wear resistance under abrasive wear ( d v = thickness of the boride layer). Test conditions: DP-U grinding tester, SiC paper 220, testing time 6 min. Source: Ref 15 , 16 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 3 Effect of boriding on wear resistance (Faville test). (a) 0.45% C (C45) steel borided at 900 °C (1650 °F) for 3 h. (b) Titanium borided at 1000 °C (1830 °F) for 24 h. (c) Tantalum borided at 1000 °C (1830 °F) for 8 h. Source: Ref 13 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 4 Effect of steel composition (nominal values in wt%) on wear resistance under abrasive wear ( d v = thickness of the boride layer). Test conditions: DP-U grinding tester, SiC paper 220, testing time 6 min. Source: Ref 8 , 11 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 5 Comparison of wear resistance between (a) untreated, (b) carburized, and (c) borided 1018 steel in pin-on-disk wear test. Courtesy of A. Erdemir, Argonne National Laboratory More