Search Results for wear rate

Fig. 15 Total wear rate, T (C,W) ; mechanical wear rate, W; corrosion rate during wear, C w ; and the synergistic term, S ′ (C,W) , for high-carbon low-alloy (HCLA) steel using quartz anvils in a 15% quartz slurry at pH 9.0 as a function of load. Source: Ref 61 More

Fig. 24 Quantitative wear map for aluminum alloys with iso-wear-rate lines superimposed on the wear mechanism map. Source: Ref 161 More

Fig. 11 Sliding wear of Al-graphite MMCs. (a) Wear rate versus graphite content (number in parenthesis in legend correspond to load, sliding speed, and sliding distance). (b) Measured coefficient of friction versus graphite content. (c) Comparison of wear behavior for unreinforced Al, Al + SiC More

Fig. 2 Effect of the angle of impact on erosive wear rate. Source: Ref 6 More

Fig. 2 Effect of hardness on wear rate for high-speed tool steels, each having been double tempered to the indicated hardness More

Fig. 10 Effect of cutting speed on the wear rate of cubic boron nitride tooling. Workpiece: AISI 4340 steel (35 HRC). Source: Ref 37 More

Fig. 3 Specific wear rate for a number of polymers as reported in the literature. The experimental conditions as reported in the literature are given in the table. Specimen Material Counterface roughness ( R a ), μm Sliding speed ( v ), m/s 1/ S ε (a) Normal pressure ( p More

Fig. 13 Wear rate of PTFE and its composites under different experimental conditions. For specimens 1 to 4: sliding speed ( v ) = 0.2 m/s; normal pressure ( p ) = 0.05 MPa (0.007 ksi). Source: Ref 16 . For specimens 7 to 9: sliding speed ( v ) = 1.6 m/s; normal pressure ( p ) = 0.69 MPa (0.10 More

Fig. 3 Dimensionless wear rate, W , at two loads as a function of volume fraction of bronze particles in epoxy-Cu-Al system (Cu-Al particle diameter ≃ 100 μm). Abrading surface, silicon carbide. (a) Fine grade; (b) coarse grade. α-space between two particles, β. LROM; linear rule of mixtures More

Fig. 17 Specific wear rate and friction coefficient of unidirectional composites (see Table 4 ) in three orientations ( P , 1.5 N/mm 2 ; V , 0.83 m/s; distance slid, 16 km). More

Fig. 20 Specific wear rate as a function of fiber composition in hybrid composite ( L 93 N, velocity V ) 0.5 m/s, nominal V f 0.57 with dotted curve for calculated values as per equation in Ref 59 . IROM, inverse rule of mixture; LROM, linear rule of mixture. Source: Ref 59 More

Fig. 29 Bands of normalized wear rate versus hardness for low-stress scratching, high-stress gouging, and impact wear. Low-stress scratching shows the strongest dependence on hardness, while impact abrasion shows the least. The scatter in the impact abrasion data suggests a growing More

Fig. 30 Correlation of hardness with wear rate for three materials. The two 50 HRC materials both exhibit the same low-stress scratching wear resistance. However, as the wear severity increases, the steel designed for ground-engaging tools (steel A) exhibits moderate improvements in gouging More

Fig. 13 Plot of specific wear rate versus amplitude of slip. Each core is the result of a separate investigation More

Fig. 7 Schematic representation of friction, interface temperature, and wear rate changes during the determination of PV limit by (a) constant velocity and incremental load increases or (b) wear rate vs. load at constant velocity. Source: Ref 7 More

Fig. 6 Experiments by Lancaster indicated that the wear rate of brass against high-speed steel changed dramatically as a function of sliding speed and temperature at a constant load (29.4 N, or 6.6 lbf). Note further that the speed range for the severe wear regime depended on both temperature More

Fig. 9 Wear rate of the slider pin versus applied load for AISI 1050 steel heat treated to three Vickers hardness (HV) levels. The distinctness of the transitions diminished as hardness was increased by heat treatment. Source: Ref 1 , 16 More

Fig. 7 Fretting maps of (a) wear rate and slip mode as a function of applied displacement; and (b) slip mode as a function of applied displacement amplitude and applied normal load. Source: Ref 25 More

Fig. 20 Effect of hardness and microstructure on the wear rate of cast chromium-molybdenum low-alloy steel grinding balls. Wear is measured relative to martensite of 0.80% C steel. More

Fig. 6 Linear wear rate of AISI 430 (UNS 43000) ferritic stainless steel sliding against alumina in 0.5 M H 2 SO 4 and 0.5 M NaOH at different passive potentials. Source: Ref 33 More