Fig. 20 (a) Advantage of low-viscosity quenching oil over (b) high-viscosity oil. See text for discussion. More

Fig. 2 Viscosity index chart. VI, viscosity index More

Fig. 4 Results of the viscosity tests. Relative viscosity values: Bad lot—43, Good lot—48, Specifications—47 to 51 More

Fig. 50 Temperature dependency of viscosity for liquid iron. Source: Ref 152 More

Fig. 81 Effect of molecular weight (MW) and viscosity of petroleum oil basestock on cooling curve behavior. Source: Ref 210 More

Fig. 92 Viscosity of two martempering oils as a function of time in use. Variations such as these may be observed from oil-to-oil and tank-to-tank. Source: Ref 188 More

Fig. 4 Silica viscosity data with units of temperature in °C. Source: Ref 5 More

Fig. 1 (a) Temperature dependence of the viscosity of an undercooled melt. (b) Heat capacity of an undercooled melt as a function of temperature. Also shown is the typical heat capacity of the corresponding crystalline solid (at the same composition). More

Fig. 2 Steady-state apparent viscosity, η, versus γ for AZ91D (various isothermals) More

Fig. 3 Steady-state apparent viscosity, η, versus γ for AM50 (various isothermals) More

Fig. 4 Steady-state apparent viscosity, η, versus γ for AM60 (various isothermals) More

Fig. 2 Viscosity of iron-carbon alloys as a function of carbon concentration at a temperature ≈20° above liquidus. Source: Ref 2 More

Fig. 1 Experimentally determined viscosity and shear stress versus fraction solid of Sn-15%Pb alloy cooled at 0.006 K/s with a shear rate of 200 s −1 . Source: Ref 2 More

Fig. 2 Effect of shear rate on apparent viscosity of semisolid alloys. Source: Ref 3 More

Fig. 30 (a) Velocity field, (b), turbulent (eddy) viscosity obtained using k - ε models for isotropic turbulence, and (c) large eddy simulation (LES) for an induction ceramic furnace More

Fig. 33 Dynamic viscosity of different metals at melting point compared to water More

Fig. 9 Viscosity profiles of polyaspartic clear coats with different ratios of polyaspartic ester resins More

Fig. 31 Kinematic viscosity versus concentration for type I polyalkylene glycol quenchants More

Fig. 32 Kinematic viscosity versus concentration for type II polyalkylene glycol quenchants More

Fig. 6 Variation of viscosity with temperature for selected glasses. Numbers shown are Corning Glass designations; see Table 3 for compositions. Source: Ref 22 More