1-20 of 2192

Search Results for tensile testing

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 7 Dynamic tensile testing results for Q&P 980 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2009
Fig. 4 Texture evolution due to tensile testing of magnesium alloy AZ31B rolled sheet to a strain of ∼0.11; comparison between model and experiment. Source: Ref 40 More
Image
Published: 30 November 2018
Fig. 5 Results of tensile testing of 6013-T4 that had been welded and postweld aged for laser beam welds (LBW) and laser stir welds (LSW) More
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 27 Sheet-metal specimen orientations for tensile testing. RD, rolling direction; TD, transverse direction More
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 13 Load capabilities of different high loading rate tensile testing equipment More
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 14 High-loading-rate tensile testing machine (12 MN capacity) More
Image
Published: 01 November 1995
Fig. 26 Example of a frictional, face-loaded grip for tensile testing of continuous-fiber-reinforced composites. Source: Ref 109 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 15 Principle of high-rate tensile testing with flywheel setup More
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 11 Loading train for high-temperature tensile testing More
Image
Published: 30 June 2023
Fig. 12 Correlation between shear punch and uniaxial tensile testing across a range of metallic materials. (a) Shear yield vs. tensile yield strength. (b) Ultimate shear strength vs. ultimate tensile strength. Adapted from Ref 54 – 56 More
Image
Published: 30 June 2023
Fig. 13 Summary of the small ring tensile testing method, showing (a) a schematic of the loading arrangement, (b) a Tinius-Olsen H25KS uniaxial test frame with modified conventional uniaxial specimen (loading fixtures) that accepts small ring specimens, and (c) an example small ring tensile More
Image
Published: 01 January 1997
Fig. 20 A bend test eliminates the grip problem in tensile testing ceramics and can be used to measure the material modulus of rupture ( Eq 3 ). Source: Ref 4 More
Image
Published: 01 June 2024
Fig. 43 Fracture surfaces resulting from tensile testing of a TiAl-Nb-Mo alloy in the following conditions: (a) as-cast, 20 °C (70 °F), (b) as-cast, 800 °C (1470 °F), (c) as-cast, 900 °C (1650 °F), (d) as-extruded, 20 °C (70 °F), (e) as-extruded, 800 °C (1470 °F), and (f) as-extruded, 900 °C More
Image
Published: 15 May 2022
Fig. 6 Immersion of tensile test specimens followed by tensile strength testing More
Image
Published: 30 June 2023
Fig. 6 Correlation of small punch tensile test and tensile strength data of various conventional and additive manufacturing (AM) materials. Adapted from Ref 25 More
Image
Published: 30 June 2023
Fig. 5 Fracture morphology of small punch tensile test samples tested with the layering direction (a) parallel to and (b) perpendicular to the loading direction. Source: Ref 13 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1997
Fig. 6 Impact test methods exhibiting various states of stress. (a) Tensile test—uniaxial stress state. (b) Dynatup test—biaxial stress state. (c) Notch Izod test—triaxial stress state. (d) Competing failure modes More
Image
Published: 01 January 1987
Fig. 23 Initiation of fracture in a tensile-test specimen. Note that the fracture initiated at the center of the specimen 4.75 × More
Image
Published: 01 January 1987
Fig. 4 Surface of a room-temperature tensile-test fracture in a specimen taken from an ingot prepared by adding Fe 2 O 3 to pure iron in a vacuum melt equilibrated at 1550 °C (2820 °F) in a silica crucible. The ingot contained 0.07% O in the form of FeO. The fracture surface contains dimples More
Image
Published: 01 January 1987
Fig. 17 Surface of tensile-test fracture in specimen of low-carbon, high-oxygen iron that was broken at room temperature. Many of the equiaxed dimples contain spheroidal particles of FeO. The rectangle marks the area shown at higher magnification in Fig. 18 and 19 . SEM, 500× More