Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
surface finish
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Book Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 1950 Search Results for
surface finish
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Book: Machining
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 16
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1989
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v16.a0002119
EISBN: 978-1-62708-188-7
... Abstract This article distinguishes between a surface finish and a surface texture. It provides information on the surface integrity technology that describes and controls the many possible alterations produced in a surface layer during manufacture, including their effects on material...
Abstract
This article distinguishes between a surface finish and a surface texture. It provides information on the surface integrity technology that describes and controls the many possible alterations produced in a surface layer during manufacture, including their effects on material properties and the performance of the surface in service. The types of surface alterations associated with metal removal practices are described. The article discusses the surface roughness, surface integrity, and produced in manufacturing processes, and mechanical property effects. Surface alterations associated with metal removal practices of traditional and nontraditional machining operations, as well as their effect on the static mechanical properties of materials, are reviewed. Finally, the article provides guidelines for material removal, postprocessing, and inspection.
Book Chapter
Series: ASM Desk Editions
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 December 1998
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.mhde2.a0003190
EISBN: 978-1-62708-199-3
... Abstract Both surface finish and surface integrity must be defined, measured, and maintained within specified limits in the processing of any product. Surface texture is defined in terms of roughness, waviness, lay, and flaws. This article illustrates some of the designations of surface...
Abstract
Both surface finish and surface integrity must be defined, measured, and maintained within specified limits in the processing of any product. Surface texture is defined in terms of roughness, waviness, lay, and flaws. This article illustrates some of the designations of surface roughness and the symbols for defining lay and its direction. In addition, it describes the applications of surface integrity, typical surface integrity problems created in metal removal operations, and principal causes of surface alterations produced by machining processes. The article tabulates the effect of some machining methods on fatigue strength, and low-stress grinding procedures for steels, nickel-base high-temperature alloys, and titanium alloys.
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 20
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1997
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v20.a0002494
EISBN: 978-1-62708-194-8
... Abstract This article presents general design principles for different types of surface-finishing processes, such as cleaning, organic coatings, and inorganic coatings applied by a variety of techniques. It discusses the factors that influence the selection of surface-finishing processes...
Abstract
This article presents general design principles for different types of surface-finishing processes, such as cleaning, organic coatings, and inorganic coatings applied by a variety of techniques. It discusses the factors that influence the selection of surface-finishing processes. These include fabrication processes, size, weight, functional requirements, and design features. The article discusses the design as an integral part of manufacturing. It contains tables that summarize the design limitations for selected surface-preparation, organic finishing, and inorganic finishing processes.
Book: Surface Engineering
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 5
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1994
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v05.a0001239
EISBN: 978-1-62708-170-2
... Abstract Thermal phenomena play a key role in the mechanics of surface finishing processes. This article provides information on the analysis and measurement of temperatures and associated thermal damage generated by finishing processes that are essential to the production of engineered...
Abstract
Thermal phenomena play a key role in the mechanics of surface finishing processes. This article provides information on the analysis and measurement of temperatures and associated thermal damage generated by finishing processes that are essential to the production of engineered components with controlled surface properties. Emphasis is placed on kinematically simple configurations of finishing processes, such as surface grinding, flat surface polishing, and lapping.
Book Chapter
Series: ASM Desk Editions
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 November 1995
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.emde.a0003055
EISBN: 978-1-62708-200-6
... grinding machine tool factors machining operational factors slicing and slotting wheel selection factors work material factors CERAMICS ARE FINISHED before final use to meet shape, size, finish or surface, and quality requirements. The extent of finishing depends on the application...
Abstract
Ceramics usually require some form of machining prior to use to meet dimensional and surface quality standards. This article focuses on abrasive machining, particularly grinding, and addresses common methods and critical process factors. It covers cylindrical, centerless, and disk grinding and provides information on tooling, wheel selection, work material, and operational factors. It also discusses precision slicing and slotting, lapping, honing, and polishing as well as abrasive waterjet, electrical discharge, laser, and ultrasonic machining.
Image
Published: 01 January 1989
Fig. 3 Surface trace and surface finish of four identically machined metals and alloys. (a) Type 316 SS. (b) High-purity depleted uranium. (c) U-6Nb alloy. (d) U-0.75Ti alloy (age-hardened to 43 HRC). Identical test conditions include cutoff (0.8 mm, or 0.03 in.), drive speed (0.25 mm/s
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1989
Fig. 12 Comparison of theoretical surface finish with actual surface produced with cermet tool. Theoretical value = f 2 /8 R , where f = feed rate and R = tool nose radius. Machining parameters: cutting speed, 200 m/min (650 sfm); depth of cut, 2.0 mm (0.080 in.). Workpiece: 4135 steel
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1989
Fig. 7 Surface finish improvement produced by TEA etchant. The initial surface was produced with a standard etchant.
More
Image
in Modeling of Quenching, Residual-Stress Formation, and Quench Cracking
> Metals Process Simulation
Published: 01 November 2010
Fig. 17 Effect of surface finish on surface heat-transfer coefficient during water quenching. (a) 120, (b) 400, and (c) 600 grade. Note: 600 grade is the smoothest finish, and 120 grade is the roughest. Source: Ref 42
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 35 Effect of percent cold draft on machined surface finish in a screw machine test for an enhanced-machining version of S31600
More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Image
Published: 01 January 1989
Fig. 8 Effect of sulfide size on machined surface finish for a free-machining austenitic stainless steel. Source: Ref 11
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1989
Fig. 13 Comparison of machined surface finish obtained for sulfur-bearing (S30300) and selenium-bearing (S30323) austenitic stainless steels in a plunge machining test. Source: Ref 2
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1989
Fig. 21 Effect of percent cold draft on machined surface finish in a screw machine test for an enhanced-machining version of S31600
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1989
Fig. 18 Surface finish at various depths of cut when broaching 390 aluminum alloy of 100 HB at 45 m/min (150 sfm) with a carbide tool. Although the rake angle varied, the shear angle of the tool was 0° in all three cases. Source: Ref 2
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1989
Fig. 36 Relationship between surface finish and depth of cut for the chemical milling of 7075 aluminum sheet. Source: Ref 5
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 8 Surface finish (in microinches) of a sterling silver fork before and after coining with hand-stoned and polished dies
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2006
Image
Published: 01 January 2006
Fig. 10 Comparison of surface finish of gas-cut specimens. (a) Proper speed, preheat, and cutting-oxygen pressure. Note clean face and nearly straight drag lines. (b) Proper speed and cutting-oxygen pressure, too much preheat. Note excessive slag and rounding of top edge. (c) Proper preheat
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2006
Fig. 13 Poor surface finish on a tantalum-silicon workpiece resulting from an incomplete initial cut by the abrasive waterjet stream. Left side is bottom of cut. Courtesy of Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Rhode Island
More
1