Search Results for strain localization

Fig. 13 Typical nominal stress/local strain curves versus distances from crack tip determined using 200 μm foil strain gages. The distances A-F and G-K are approximately 2 mm. Center notch is 3 mm long and 0.2 mm wide. R was 0.05. Source: Ref 36 More

Fig. 44 Nominally imposed elastic stress and strain and local changes in stress and strain at a notch root More

Fig. 46 Changes in local stress and strain on nominal elastic unloading More

Fig. 18 Load versus local strain behavior of a notched member showing three regions of behavior: no yielding (a), local yielding (b), and fully plastic yielding (c). Source: Ref 1 (p 594) More

Fig. 13 Stress-strain curve illustration of reduction in a localized length difference by plastic deformation during flattening and leveling. (a) First imposed state of tension before it is released. (b) Continuing from the state of applied tension to a state of applied compression before More

Fig. 35 Measured localized strains during rolling of lead bars. Left side shows longitudinal tensile strain versus vertical compressive strain. Right side shows longitudinal strain versus cross-sectional area reduction at room temperature. Source: Ref 37 More

Fig. 2 Localized strains on (a) the bulging cylindrical surface of an upset test and (b) their variation with aspect ratio and friction conditions. Source: Ref 1 More

Fig. 3 Localized strains at the edges of bars during (a) rolling and (b) their variation with edge profile. Source: Ref 2 More

Fig. 16 Fracture strain locus predicted by the model of localized thinning. The shaded area represents typical experimental fracture loci. More

Fig. 26 Measured localized strains during the rolling of lead bars. Left side shows longitudinal tensile strain versus vertical compressive strain. Right side shows longitudinal strain versus cross-sectional area reduction at room temperature. More

Fig. 19 (a) Localized strains on the bulging cylindrical surface of a compression test specimen. (b) Variation of strains with aspect ratio ( h/D ) of specimen and friction conditions. Source: Ref 28 More

Fig. 24 Measured localized strains during the rolling of lead bars. Left side shows longitudinal strain versus vertical compressive strain. Right side shows longitudinal strain versus cross-section reduction of area at room temperature. Source: Ref 28 More

Fig. 18 Anisotropy parameter R versus the local axial true strain for various nominal strain rates. Data correspond to a Ti-21Al-22Nb alloy. Source: Ref 10 More

Fig. 5 Use of pinch-off dies in upset welding processes to localize strain More

Fig. 14 Localized strains on (a) the bulging cylindrical surface of an upset test and (b) their variation with aspect ratio and friction conditions. Source: Ref 34 More

Fig. 24 Fracture strain locus predicted by the model of localized thinning. The shaded area represents typical experimental fracture loci, such as Figs 18 to 20 More

Fig. 5 Localized strains on (a) the bulging cylindrical surface of an upset test and (b) their variation with aspect ratio and friction conditions. Source: Ref 2 More

Fig. 16 Local finite-element model of a damaged bondline used in strain energy release rate calculation for bonded joints. Source: Ref 29 More

Fig. 22 Determination of local stress-strain behavior using Neuber’s rule. Adapted from Ref 4 More

amplitude. This alloy has 5 to 10 μm θ dispersoids to reduce strain localization. In alloy 2024, which has manganese to form MnAl 6 dispersoid particles approximately 0.5 μm in diameter, the cyclic softening is absent. The precipitous drop in Δσ/2 is due to cracking. Source: Ref 14 More