1-20 of 2208 Search Results for

sensitivity

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 24A
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 30 June 2023
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v24A.a0006952
EISBN: 978-1-62708-439-0
... Abstract This article provides a detailed discussion on nanoindentation hardness, high-strain-rate behavior and strain-rate sensitivity, and corrosion response of additively manufactured (AM) metals. It summarizes the most commonly used AM alloys for applications in harsh environments...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 4E
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 June 2016
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v04e.a0006272
EISBN: 978-1-62708-169-6
... Abstract This article discusses the various methods for evaluating the quench sensitivity of aluminum alloys, namely, time-temperature-property diagrams, the quench factor analysis, the Jominy end-quench method, and continuous-cooling precipitation diagrams. It briefly describes the procedures...
Image
Published: 01 January 1997
Fig. 42 Observed and predicted sensitivity of stress-corrosion-cracking sensitivity to corrosion potential for sensitized type 304 stainless steel in 288 °C water. The data points are measurements made in the laboratory or in reactors. The curves are the predicted relationships More
Image
Published: 01 January 1986
Fig. 5 Sensitivity of PIXE analysis versus proton energy and atomic number based on typical parameter given in the text. Source: Ref 4 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1986
Fig. 8 Minimum detectable limits versus sensitivity and beam diameter for electron and PIXE microprobes. More
Image
Published: 01 January 1986
Fig. 9 Dependence of surface sensitivity on takeoff angle. More
Image
Published: 01 January 1986
Fig. 6 Relative sensitivity as a function of atomic number for 2-keV helium and neon ions. More
Image
Published: 01 January 1986
Fig. 7 Spectra showing the improved sensitivity for carbon when 3 He is used instead of 4 He. This improvement is attributed to an increase in ion velocity. More
Image
Published: 01 January 1986
Fig. 3 The sensitivity of RBS to the various elements is proportional to the backscattering cross section σ, which varies as the square of the charge Z m contained in the nucleus of an atom of mass m ( Eq 4 ). The ordinate provides Z m 2 for a selection of elements More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 4 Notch sensitivity versus notch radius for various metals. Approximate values (note shaded band). Not verified for deep notches thickness/radius. Source: Ref 9 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 39 Temperature dependence of the strain-rate sensitivity of pure aluminum and alloy 2024. Note 2024-O becoming negative near room temperature. Source: Ref 63 More
Image
Published: 31 October 2011
Fig. 21 Imperfection sensitivity for 310 × 610 mm (12 × 24 in.) plate. Source: Ref 15 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 2 Map depicting the evolution of strain-rate sensitivity as a function of temperature and strain rate for CF-BM stainless steel. Source: Ref 7 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 8 Temperature dependence of strain-rate sensitivity for various engineering materials More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 9 Strain-rate sensitivity dependence of total elongation for various engineering materials More
Image
Published: 01 January 2003
Fig. 6 Variation of notch sensitivity index with notch radius for steels tested in bending or axial fatigue loading. t , thickness. Source: Ref 38 More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 11 Spectral-sensitivity curves for a type 4 radiographic film, showing exposure required to produce a density of 1.0 More
Image
Published: 15 December 2019
Fig. 3 Enhanced sensitivity achieved for the detection of isotopes that are in the neighborhood of major elements/species when appropriate blanking is applied before entering the time-of-flight mass spectrometer. (a) Isotopes with mass/charge number of ions (m/z) far from More
Image
Published: 15 December 2019
Fig. 3 The sensitivity of Rutherford backscattering spectrometry to the various elements is proportional to the backscattering cross section σ, which varies as the square of the charge Z m contained in the nucleus of an atom of mass m ( Eq 4 ). The ordinate provides Z m 2 More
Image
Published: 15 December 2019
Fig. 3 High-sensitivity glass transition temperature detection using modulated differential scanning calorimetry (MDSC). Sample: glass-fiber-reinforced epoxy-aramid/polyimide; sample size: 32.9 mg; method: MDSC 2.5/60 at 1 °C/min (1.8 °F/min); crimped pan; nitrogen gas purge. The (I) indicates More