1-20 of 215 Search Results for

scoring

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 2 Specimen gear with scoring (scuffing) failure More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 40 Effect of surface finish on load to cause scoring More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 4 Effect of retained austenite on scoring resistance of grade GOST 20X2H4A (similar to AISI 9310). Source: Ref 5 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 42 Failure due to a band of carbides. (a) AISI A2 scoring die spalled at the cutting edge during either the stoning or final grinding step after heat treatment. (b) Sectioning through the spalled region revealed a band of carbides intersecting the edge profile that promoted cracking More
Image
Published: 30 August 2021
Fig. 42 Failure due to a band of carbides. (a) AISI A2 scoring die spalled at the cutting edge during either the stoning or final grinding step after heat treatment. (b) Sectioning through the spalled region revealed a band of carbides intersecting the edge profile that promoted cracking More
Image
Published: 15 May 2022
Fig. 14 Four scoring scenarios illustrating the relative success of a project given poor, mediocre, and outstanding scores for design and for implementation. Reprinted from Ref 1 with permission by Elsevier. Copyright Elsevier 2017 More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 2 Scored block (with blistered coating) on left; smooth-faced on right More
Image
Published: 01 January 1989
Fig. 34 Turning operation in which score marks were eliminated by changing from a tungsten carbide to a titanium carbide insert. Dimensions given in inches Insert material (a) Original Conventional tungsten carbide Revised Special titanium carbide Processing details More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 5 Pattern recognition score versus yield force for powder metal clamp flanges More
Image
Published: 30 August 2021
Fig. 9 Images of a bearing and associated axle shaft. (a) Scored inside-diameter surface of the bearing. (b) Severely worn region on the axle. (c) Cross section of a region with stepped abrasive wear More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 8
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2000
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v08.a0003327
EISBN: 978-1-62708-176-4
... Abstract Mechanical tests are performed to evaluate the durability of gears under load. Gear tooth failures occur in two distinct regions, namely, the tooth flank and the root fillet. This article describes the common failure modes such as scoring, wear, and pitting, on tooth flanks. Failures...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 14A
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2005
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v14a.a0004005
EISBN: 978-1-62708-185-6
... and polymer lubricants. The article describes several procedures for extruding specific steel parts such as tubular parts and stepped shafts. It lists problems such as tool breakage and galling or scoring of tools and explains cold extrusion of aluminum, copper, and nickel alloy parts. The article also...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 11
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 15 January 2021
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v11.a0006791
EISBN: 978-1-62708-295-2
... modes of adhesive wear including scoring, scuffing, seizure, and galling, and describes the processes involved in classic laboratory-type and standardized tests for the evaluation of adhesive wear. It includes information on standardized galling tests, twist compression, slider-on-flat-surface, load...
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 1 Typical damage in sliding bearings caused by different wear processes. (a) Surface fatigue. (b) Abrasive wear. (c) Adhesive wear (scoring). (d) Erosive wear (cavitation). (e) Corrosion More
Image
Published: 01 January 1997
Fig. 2 Sample matrix evaluation system for aiding designers in rating the suitability of a product design concept for potential high quality. The component or product with the highest score is deemed to have the best potential quality. More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 10 Sliding bearings damaged by abrasion by foreign particles. (a) Unetched specimen showing a large foreign particle (arrow) at the interface of a bearing and shaft. 110×. (b) Bearing surface scored by metal chips More
Image
Published: 01 August 2018
Fig. 13 Typical flaws in seamless tubing. (a) Blister. (b) Gouge. (c) Lamination. (d) Lap (arrow). (e) Pit. (f) Plug scores. (g) Rolled-in slugs. (h) Scab. (j) Seam (arrow) More
Image
Published: 30 August 2021
Fig. 8 Sliding bearings damaged by abrasion by foreign particles. (a) Unetched specimen showing a large foreign particle (arrow) at the interface of a bearing and shaft. Original magnification: 110×. (b) Bearing surface scored by metal chips More
Image
Published: 01 January 2024
Fig. 9 Example of postfracture damage on the surface of a pasteurizer wall. Scoring on only one side of the crack resulted from displacement of the wall and contact with rotating product. Failure was not the result of the obvious mechanical damage. The scale is in 1/16 in. More
Image
Published: 01 January 2024
Fig. 42 Postfracture rubbing damage occurred along the outer circumference of a driveshaft. Prior damage along the surface (such as fretting damage) is now partially obscured. An abrupt termination of scoring marks indicates that this type of damage did not precede fracture. More