1-20 of 1773

Search Results for sample testing

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 51 Effect of sample size on the fracture of notched samples tested in slow bending. Data are normalized to the sample size for comparison. b , specimen width; d , retained depth at bottom of notch More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 51 Effect of sample size on the fracture of notched samples tested in slow bending. Data are normalized to the sample size for comparison. b , specimen width; d , retained depth at bottom of notch More
Image
Published: 30 June 2023
Fig. 5 Fracture morphology of small punch tensile test samples tested with the layering direction (a) parallel to and (b) perpendicular to the loading direction. Source: Ref 13 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 10 Erosion rates of soft-annealed Uddeholm UHB Orvar 2 (H13) samples tested in different melts and melt temperatures. Source: Ref 14 More
Image
Published: 09 June 2014
Fig. 40 Example of another induction-hardened sample tested under bending. Source: Ref 18 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 11 Typical area of the gage length for a Zn-22Al sample tested at 4 × 10 −5 s −1 to an elongation of 20%. (a) A large offset at a Zn-Al boundary is shown at A and a striated band at a Zn-Zn boundary is marked at B and at C. (b) Grain rotation in a zinc-rich phase is shown at D. Source More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 53 Potentiodynamic polarization curves of samples tested in H 2 SO 4 , scanning rate 2 mV/S (1 N H 2 SO 4 ). Source: Ref 29 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 55 Potentiodynamic polarization curves of as-received samples tested in 1 N H 2 SO 4 , scanning rate 1 mV/s. (a) A, wrought plate stainless steel of type 316; B, hot pressed sintered stainless steel; C, hot pressed and sintered stainless steel containing 0.25% Cu. (b) A, Hot pressed More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 56 Potentiodynamic polarization curves of samples tested in 5 N H 2 SO 4 , scanning rate 2 mV/s. (a) A, wrought plate stainless steel of type 316; B, 2 wt% Sn; C, HPHS 316. (b) Hot pressed and sintered sample containing A, 3 wt% Sn; B, 2 wt% Sn; C, 0.5 wt% Sn. Source: Ref 39 More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 24 Immersion testing of a peeling coating sample containing polyvinyl acetate block filler shows very poor moisture resistance (the white coat is the block filler). More
Image
Published: 15 June 2020
Fig. 11 Shear testing. (a) Drawing showing the sample sizes used. (b) Schematic of the test setup. Courtesy of M.J. Dapino, The Ohio State University. (c) Illustration of the test setup. (d) Photograph of actual test jig More
Image
Published: 30 June 2023
Fig. 2 Principle of ultrasonic testing. (a) Ultrasonic probe faces a sample to inspect that contains a flaw. (b) Plot of signal obtained by the inspection More
Image
Published: 30 June 2023
Fig. 42 In-process ultrasonic testing inspection of an aluminum sample made by wire arc additive manufacturing from below the build plate. (a) Experimental setup. (b) B-scan of the global part, with scale in decibels More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 2B
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 15 June 2019
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v02b.a0006545
EISBN: 978-1-62708-210-5
... based on electrochemical theory and those that involve the stress-sorption theory of mechanical fracture. It reviews three different categories of experiments used to compare SCC performance of candidate materials for service. The categories are tests on statically loaded smooth samples, tests...
Image
Published: 01 August 2018
Fig. 52 Micrographs of tested samples. (a) Sample A. (b) Sample B. (c) Sample C. (d) Sample D. Etched with NH 4 OH plus H 2 O 2 . Original magnification: 200×. Courtesy of J.J. Snyder, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Oceanic Division More
Image
Published: 01 June 2024
Fig. 16 ESC bend testing in a strain jig. (a) Side-view schematic of the test sample and ESC agent placement. (b) Top-down view of a CPVC test specimen showing multiple cracks on adjacent planes, a common characteristic of ESC More
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 33 Impact wear test apparatus. 1, sample; 2, steel ball; 3, ball holder; 4, base (the sample is not clamped to the base, not shown in the diagram); 5, vertical guide for the ball holder; 6, horizontal bar (defines the drop height); 7, magnetic steel block; 8, permanent magnet (attached More
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 3 Magnetic confinement fusion plasma facing component test sample with a thick (10 mm, or 400 mils) plasma-sprayed beryllium coating on a water-cooled copper substrate More
Image
Published: 01 January 1994
Fig. 2 Flame impingement on the button sample in a thermal fatigue test rig More
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 9 Hardness distribution for test samples made of AISI 1018, 4320, 5120, and 8620 steels. IQ, intensive quenching. Source: Ref 16 More