1-20 of 986 Search Results for

safety factor

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 13 (a) Scheme of the relation between range R 1 and safety factor SF 1 in the case of homogenous populations. (b) One possible scheme for an inhomogeneous population More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 14 Safety factor SF 1 varying with range R 1 for 55 data groups combined in one diagram for 1% probability of fracture. Eight random starts; probability function P = ( i − 0.417)/( n + 0.166); transformation function 3 ln ( P ) or Gaussian cumulative normality More
Image
Published: 30 August 2021
Fig. 68 (Part 2) (e) Evolution of minimum static safety factor, S 0min , versus raceway material hardness and hardness depth. In this case, the hardness depth should be greater than 3.3 to 3.5 mm (0.13 to 0.14 in.) at 29.8 HRC. CHD, case-hardness depth; SHD, surface-hardness depth. Extracts More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 19
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1996
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v19.a0002374
EISBN: 978-1-62708-193-1
... factors for P/M materials are also detailed. carbonitriding case hardening coining fatigue properties fatigue resistance fracture properties fracture resistance microstructure porosity postsintering heat treatment powder metallurgy material repressing resintering safety factor sealing...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 11A
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 30 August 2021
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v11A.a0006837
EISBN: 978-1-62708-329-4
... Abstract Because of the tough engineering environment of the railroad industry, fatigue is a primary mode of failure. The increased competitiveness in the industry has led to increased loads, reducing the safety factor with respect to fatigue life. Therefore, the existence of corrosion pitting...
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 1 Residual strength diagram in terms of load (or force). j , design safety factor; g , safety factor based on residual strength More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 34 Comparison of linear damage rule of creep-fatigue interaction with design envelopes in ASME Code Case N-47 for 304 and 316 stainless steel. Creep-damage fraction = time/time-to-rupture (multiplied by a safety factor). Fatigue-damage fraction = number of cycles/cycles to failures More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 8 Diagram showing safe and unsafe fatigue zones for cast iron subjected to ranges of alternating stress superimposed on a mean stress. Example point P shows conditions of tensile (positive) mean stress; P ′ shows compressive (negative) mean stress. The safety factor is represented More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 18 Diagram showing safe and unsafe fatigue zones for cast iron subjected to ranges of alternating stress superimposed on a mean stress. Example point “P” shows conditions of tensile (positive) mean stress; “P′” shows compressive (negative) mean stress. The safety factor is represented More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 14 Diagram showing safe and unsafe fatigue zones for cast iron subjected to ranges of alternating stress superimposed on a mean stress. Example point P shows conditions of tensile (positive) mean stress; P′ shows compressive (negative) mean stress. The safety factor is represented More
Image
Published: 31 August 2017
Fig. 28 Diagram showing safe and unsafe fatigue zones for cast iron subjected to ranges of alternating stress superimposed on a mean stress. Example point P shows conditions of tensile (positive) mean stress; P ′ shows compressive (negative) mean stress. The safety factor is represented More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 1 Failure assessment diagram (R6 curve) as proposed by the United Kingdom Central Electricity Generating Board. SF, safety factor; σ, applied stress; σ y , yield strength; a, crack length; W, panel width More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 20
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1997
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v20.a0002432
EISBN: 978-1-62708-194-8
... (however implicit) that demands and capacities do have variations. The statistical nature of design parameters has generally been ignored as shown by efforts to find unique representative values such as minimum guaranteed values, limit loads, etc. The usual approach is to use a safety factor or a worse...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 19
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1996
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v19.a0002381
EISBN: 978-1-62708-193-1
...). j , design safety factor; g , safety factor based on residual strength In every design a safety factor is used. This factor may be applied in different ways. Usually the safety factor is applied to load. For example, if the maximum anticipated service load is P s , the structure...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 20
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1997
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v20.a0002468
EISBN: 978-1-62708-194-8
... Abstract This article provides a schematic illustration of factors that should be considered in component design. It discusses the effect of component geometry on the behavior of materials and groups the main parameters that affect the value of the factor of safety. The article illustrates...
Series: ASM Handbook Archive
Volume: 11
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2002
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v11.a0003513
EISBN: 978-1-62708-180-1
... Generating Board. SF, safety factor; σ, applied stress; σ y , yield strength; a, crack length; W, panel width If a point describing the state of a component or structure (e.g., point W ) falls below the R6 curve ( Fig. 1 ), the structure is considered to be safe. A point falling on or above the R6...
Series: ASM Handbook Archive
Volume: 11
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2002
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v11.a0003500
EISBN: 978-1-62708-180-1
... techniques. One of the key factors in properly performing a failure analysis is keeping an open mind while examining and analyzing the evidence to foster a clear, unbiased perspective of the failure. Collaboration with experts in other disciplines is required in certain circumstances to integrate...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 11
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 15 January 2021
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v11.a0006753
EISBN: 978-1-62708-295-2
... to incorporate a margin or factor of safety. However, after a design is realized and evolves, the actual margin may not be carefully reevaluated. That is, the actual factor of safety may be much less than anticipated. A good example of this concept was the August 2007 collapse of the Interstate 35W bridge...
Series: ASM Handbook Archive
Volume: 11
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2002
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v11.a0003514
EISBN: 978-1-62708-180-1
... components to design for appropriate levels of safety. Computational resources are becoming less of an impediment through enhancements in computational algorithms and computer efficiency. Factor of safety approaches may not give the desired reliability or may lead to overdesigned structures...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 17
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 August 2018
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v17.a0006448
EISBN: 978-1-62708-190-0
... associated with radiography. There are two main aspects of safety: monitoring radiation dosage and protecting personnel. The article summarizes the major factors involved in both and discusses the operating characteristics of X-ray tubes. It describes the various methods of controlling scattered radiation...