Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
revise
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Book Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 586
Search Results for revise
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 7 Original and revised lever designs showing plot of stresses in the original and redesigned part. Dimensions given in millimeters
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 22 Revised time-temperature diagram for temper-embrittled AISI/SAE 3140 alloy steel. Source: Ref 102
More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 16 A revision in design of this sand cast malleable iron gear housing reduced the mass of metal at each of the four mounting lugs. This decreased the riser requirement from six to three and substantially reduced cost
More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 13 Two practical methods of revising Y-junctions to T-junctions, to reduce the mass of metal at the junctions. With all walls the same thickness and all radii equal, in (a) the circle inscribed in the Y-junction is approximately 23 percent larger than the circle inscribed in the T
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2006
Fig. 10 Difference between the original and revised formula for the thickness effect
More
Image
Published: 27 April 2016
Source: A. Markström, B. Sundman, and K. Frisk, A Revised Thermodynamic Description of the Co-W-C System, J. Phase Equilib. Diff ., Vol 26, 2005, p 152–160 ( Ref 1 )
More
Image
Published: 27 April 2016
Source: A. Markström, B. Sundman, and K. Frisk, A Revised Thermodynamic Description of the Co-W-C System, J. Phase Equilib. Diff ., Vol 26, 2005, p 152–160 ( Ref 1 )
More
Image
Published: 27 April 2016
Source: A. Markström, B. Sundman, and K. Frisk, A Revised Thermodynamic Description of the Co-W-C System, J. Phase Equilib. Diff ., Vol 26, 2005, p 152–160 ( Ref 1 )
More
Image
Published: 27 April 2016
Source: A. Markström, B. Sundman, and K. Frisk, A Revised Thermodynamic Description of the Co-W-C System, J. Phase Equilib. Diff ., Vol 26, 2005, p 152–160 ( Ref 1 )
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 30 Revised Schaeffler (constitution) diagram used to predict the amount of δ-ferrite that will be obtained during elevated-temperature forging or welding of austenite/ferritic stainless steels. A, austenite; M, martensite. WRC, Welding Research Council. Source: Ref 64
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 42 Schaeffler diagram. See Fig. 30 for revised Schaeffler diagram.
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1989
Fig. 19 Revision of gullet configuration to eliminate problems in broaching Incoloy 901. Dimensions given in inches
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 30 Fuselage engine support forging, showing original and revised parting line locations. The revision restricted all of the forging impressions to one die. See Example 8. Dimensions in figure given in inches Item Preferred forging Material Aluminum alloy 7075 (a) Heat
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 32 Forged aileron hinge fittings of original and revised designs. The parting line location in the original design, shown in (a) and (b), was changed to that shown in (c) and (d) to correct end grain runout. See Example 10. Dimensions in figure given in inches Item Revised forging
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 15 Revised conventional wing fold hinge rib forging, with straight parting line corresponding to the central plane of the web. The revised design served to distribute draft between upper and lower dies (compare views in sections A-A). Locations of 12 test coupons are indicated by boldface
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 17 Aluminum bulkhead fitting of revised design. The high, thin cross ribs, shown at the midsection of the forging, had a height-to-width ratio of 15.5 to 1. To produce this bulkhead fitting forging, two sets of blocker dies were required prior to finish forging. Dimensions given in inches
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 22 Conventional aluminum alloy wing fold rib forgings of original and revised designs, showing relocation of parting line to improve producibility. Dimensions given in inches
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 13 Compressor disk forgings of original and revised designs, showing machined contours in phantom. See Example 1. Dimensions in figure given in inches Item Revised design Material AMS 5613 (type 410 stainless steel) (a) Forging equipment 35 kN (8000 lbf) hammer (b) 50
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 17 Revised conventional half-duct forging, and sectional views of forgings of original design (a) and revised design (b). See Example 5. Dimensions in figure given in inches Item Conventional forging (revised) Material Aluminum alloy 2014 (a) Forging equipment 35,000
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 18 Original (a) and revised (b) forging sequences for producing motor case heads. A sectional view of the revised forging is shown in (c). See Example 6. Dimensions in figure given in inches Item Conventional forging (revised) Material Titanium alloy Ti-13.5V-11Cr-3AI
More
1