Fig. 9 Representative interstitial sites in unit cells. Source: Ref 3 as published in Ref 2 More

Fig. 24 Stress ratio effects from correlation function V ( R ) from published fatigue crack growth rate curves for (a) Quenched and tempered steels at growth rates between 10 −8 and 10 −7 m/cycles and (b) for aluminum alloys, Type 304 stainless steel, and a titanium alloy. Source: Ref 25 More

Fig. 11 Data collected from published work of various authors showing the percentage of cracked SiC p particles as a function of fracture strain for a variety of DRA materials. SA, solution annealed; UA, underaged; OA, overaged; PA, peak aged. Ref and Material: □ Ref 10 , 6061/10%/6,5 μm More

Fig. 12 Data collected from published work of various authors showing the percentage of cracked Al 2 O 3p as a function of fracture strain for a variety of DRA materials. UA, underaged; OA, overaged. Ref and Material: □ Ref 13 , 2014/14.4%/12 μm; ● Ref 13 , 6061/14.9%/12 μm; Δ Ref 13 More

Fig. 13 Data collected from published work of various authors showing the percentage of cracked SiC p as a function of fracture strain for a variety of DRA materials. SA, solution annealed; UA, underaged; OA, overaged. Ref and Material: □ Ref 9 , Al-Si-Mg/10%; ○ Ref 9 , Al-Si-Mg/15%; ▲ Ref More

Fig. 14 Data collected from published work of various authors showing the percentage of cracked SiC p at fracture as a function of true stress for a variety of DRA materials. Ref and Material: ○ Ref 30 , 2618/15%/12 μm; + Ref 13 , Al-12Si/17.3%/5 μm; Δ Ref 13 , 201/9%/23 μm; ▲ Ref 13 More

Fig. 15 Data collected from published work of various authors showing the percentage of cracked Al 2 O 3p at fracture as a function of true stress for a variety of DRA materials. Ref and Material: □ Ref 13 , 2024/14.4%/12 μm; ● Ref 13 , 6061/14.9%/12 μm More

Fig. 16 Data collected from published work of various authors showing the percentage of cracked SiC p at fracture as a function of true stress for a variety of DRA materials. Ref and Material: □ Ref 9 , Al-Si-Mg/10%; ○ Ref 9 , Al-Si-Mg/15%; ▲ Ref 9 , Al-Si-Mg/20% More

Fig. 17 Data collected from published work of various authors showing the effect of global plastic strain on the reduction in elastic modulus. Ref and Material: ◊ Ref 30 , 2618-T651/15%/12 μm; ■ Ref 30 , 2618-T4/15%/12 μm; □ Ref 13 , 2618/15%; ▲ Ref 34 , A356-T61/20%; Δ Ref 34 , A356-OA30 More

Fig. 16 Transformation rate versus temperature. Source: Ref 4 as published in Ref 2 More

Fig. 17 Fraction reacted as a function of time. Source: Ref 4 as published in Ref 2 More

Fig. 5 Aluminum-silicon phase diagram. Source: Ref 3 as published in Ref 4 More

Fig. 6 Properties of aluminum-silicon alloys. Source: Ref 3 as published in Ref 2 More

Fig. 2 Monotectic reaction in copper-lead system. Source: Ref 2 as published in Ref 3 More

Fig. 4 Effect of alloying elements on yield strength. Source: Ref 4 as published in Ref 3 More

Fig. 7 Formation of pearlite from austenite. Source: Ref 5 as published in Ref 3 More

Fig. 8 Pearlitic structure in eutectoid steel. Source: Ref 6 as published in Ref 3 More

Fig. 19 Widmanstätten ferrite. Source: Ref 14 as published in Ref 3 More

Fig. 23 Effect of carbon content on impact properties. Source: Ref 4 as published in Ref 3 More

Fig. 28 Portion of the uranium-silicon phase diagram. Source: Ref 19 as published in Ref 1 More