Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
probability of detection
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Book Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 738 Search Results for
probability of detection
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 17
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 August 2018
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v17.a0006463
EISBN: 978-1-62708-190-0
... Abstract Probability of detection (POD) assesses the performance of a non-destructive evaluation (NDE)-based inspection, which is a method used to determine the capability of an inspection as a function of defect type and defect size. This article provides an overview of the concept of POD, why...
Abstract
Probability of detection (POD) assesses the performance of a non-destructive evaluation (NDE)-based inspection, which is a method used to determine the capability of an inspection as a function of defect type and defect size. This article provides an overview of the concept of POD, why it is needed, the history behind the development of POD, how POD assessments are performed, and how modeling and simulation can be integrated into the execution of a POD assessment. It describes the methods by which POD is determined. This includes detail on the experimental process to acquire the needed data, the mathematical methods to obtain a POD curve, and techniques to assess uncertainty in the POD curve as it is obtained from a limited data set. The concept of model-assisted POD (MAPOD) is introduced, with additional details and representative examples of MAPOD.
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 4 Probability of detection concepts (POD) and probability of false alarm (PFA) are determined by fractions of signal and noise distributions above a threshold. Signal distribution generally shifts to higher levels as flaw size increases, leading to the sigmoidal POD curve. Source: Ref 22
More
Image
Published: 01 August 2018
Fig. 1 Probability of detection (POD) concepts and the probability of false alarm (PFA) are determined by fractions of signal and noise distributions above a threshold. Signal distribution generally shifts to higher levels as flaw size increases, leading to the sigmoidal POD curve.
More
Image
in Reliability of Flaw Detection by Nondestructive Inspection
> Nondestructive Evaluation of Materials
Published: 01 August 2018
Fig. 26 Sample plot of probability of detection/probability of false alarm curves for different flaw sizes. Source: Ref 16
More
Image
Published: 01 August 2018
Fig. 7 Concepts of probability of detection (POD) and probability of false alarms (PFA) are determined by fractions of signal and noise distribution above a desired threshold. Signals generally increase as the flaw size increases, leading to a sigmoidal shape POD curve. Source: Ref 28
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 7 Probability of crack detection in one inspection. (a) Basic curve. (b) Effect of accessibility, and specificity, or other difficulty factor
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 8 Inspection intervals based on H /2. (a) Probability of detection for two inspection methods. (b) Inspection times on crack growth curve
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 9 Cumulative probability of crack detection as a function of the length of the inspection interval. (a) Case 1 of Fig. 10 . (b) Case 2 of Fig. 10
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 9 Role of NDE, as quantified by probability of detection (POD), in fully probabilistic life management
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 5 Retirement-for-Cause (RFC) inspection system probability of detection (POD) curves for various geometrical features. Source: Ref 17
More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 1 Illustration of a probabilistic concept of probability of detection (POD). At any crack size, different cracks of the same size will have varying detectability.
More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 3 Probability of detection data for magnetic-particle inspection of steel parts based on data from Ref 8
More
Image
Published: 01 August 2018
Fig. 3 Illustration of a probabilistic concept of probability of detection (POD). At any crack size, different cracks of the same size will have varying detectability.
More
Image
Published: 01 August 2018
Fig. 5 Model-assisted probability of detection (MAPOD) model-building process with complete approach to uncertainty propagation in MAPOD, from MIL-HDBK-1823A, Appendix H (2009). Source: Ref 31
More
Image
Published: 01 August 2018
Fig. 8 Mean probability of detection (POD) and 95% confidence for the raised head fastener probability of detection study. These are the aggregate of all results. Fits were calculated using the MIL-HDBK-1823 software
More
Image
Published: 01 August 2018
Fig. 10 Probability of detection curves by sample set quadrant for the transfer function. Source: Ref 52
More
Image
in Reliability of Flaw Detection by Nondestructive Inspection
> Nondestructive Evaluation of Materials
Published: 01 August 2018
Fig. 6 Probability of detection plots for four different nondestructive evaluation methods on the same set of specimens. (a) Penetrant inspection. (b) Ultrasonic inspection. (c) Eddy current inspection. (d) X-ray inspection
More
Image
in Reliability of Flaw Detection by Nondestructive Inspection
> Nondestructive Evaluation of Materials
Published: 01 August 2018
Image
in Reliability of Flaw Detection by Nondestructive Inspection
> Nondestructive Evaluation of Materials
Published: 01 August 2018
Fig. 14 Probability of detection curve for an automated fluorescent penetrant inspection system
More
Image
in Reliability of Flaw Detection by Nondestructive Inspection
> Nondestructive Evaluation of Materials
Published: 01 August 2018
Fig. 17 Retirement-for-cause system probability of detection curves for various geometrical features
More
1