Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
pole figure
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Book Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 243 Search Results for
pole figure
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Image
in Crystallographic Analysis by Electron Backscatter Diffraction in the Scanning Electron Microscope
> Materials Characterization
Published: 15 December 2019
Fig. 1 Inverse pole figure orientation map and pole figures from a grain-oriented electrical steel transformer. (a) Inverse pole figure orientation map with respect to the rolling direction. (b) {001}, {110}, and {111} pole figures extracted from the electron backscatter diffraction map data
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1986
Image
Published: 01 January 1986
Image
Published: 01 January 1986
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 3 (111) pole figure of the ideal rolling components (including symmetrically equivalent orientations)
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 4 (111) pole figure corresponding to simulated rolling reductions of 63%, 86%, and 95% (ε 33 = −1, −2, −3, respectively) using the full constraints (FC), relaxed constraints (RC), and self-consistent (SC) approaches
More
Image
in Transformation and Recrystallization Textures Associated with Steel Processing
> Metalworking: Bulk Forming
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 5 (002) pole figure of all variants of the bcc α phase formed from an (001)[100] oriented face-centered cubic (fcc) γ crystal following the Bain and Kurdjumov-Sachs (K-S) relationships
More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 10 (a) Orientation distribution function (ODF). (b) {111} pole figure. (c) {111} fiber plot showing the texture of an aluminum thin film
More
Image
Published: 31 October 2011
Fig. 11 Inverse pole figure of an unconsolidated portion of the nickel-nickel interface. Note the extremely fine grains that are present along the defect boundaries. Source: Ref 53
More
Image
Published: 01 December 2009
Fig. 26 Titanium annealed in a magnetic field. (a) {0002} pole figure for the titanium sheet sample corresponding to the initial texture. (b) and (c) Simulated pole figures after 10 min annealing at 750 °C for a two-dimensional titanium polycrystal. (b) without field. (c) In a magnetic field
More
Image
in Modeling of Microstructure Evolution during the Thermomechanical Processing of Nickel-Base Superalloys
> Fundamentals of Modeling for Metals Processing
Published: 01 December 2009
Fig. 3 Electron backscatter diffraction inverse-pole-figure map for alloy 718 with an initial grain size of 200 µm deformed in torsion at 980 °C, 1 s −1 to an effective strain of 0.7 and then held for 140 s. Boundary misorientations are indicated in light gray (2°) to dark gray or red (12
More
Image
in Modeling of Microstructure Evolution during the Thermomechanical Processing of Nickel-Base Superalloys
> Fundamentals of Modeling for Metals Processing
Published: 01 December 2009
Fig. 4 Electron backscatter diffraction inverse-pole-figure maps for Nimonic 80A showing the deformed (top) and recrystallized (bottom) fraction as a function of the indicated strains. The black areas represent the corresponding second fraction. Coherent twins have been removed. The width
More
Image
in Modeling of Microstructure Evolution during the Thermomechanical Processing of Nickel-Base Superalloys
> Fundamentals of Modeling for Metals Processing
Published: 01 December 2009
Fig. 7 Electron backscatter diffraction inverse-pole-figure map for alloy 718 with an initial grain size of 50 µm deformed in uniaxial compression at 980 °C, 0.01 s −1 to a true strain of 0.4. Boundary misorientations are indicated in light gray (2°) to dark gray or red (12°) to black (≥15
More
Image
in Modeling of Microstructure Evolution during the Thermomechanical Processing of Nickel-Base Superalloys
> Fundamentals of Modeling for Metals Processing
Published: 01 December 2009
Fig. 8 (a),(b) Electron backscatter diffraction inverse-pole-figure map for Waspaloy ingot material that was deformed in uniaxial compression at 1120 °C, 0.01 s −1 to a true strain of 0.27. (c) Optical micrograph showing Waspaloy ingot material that was deformed at 1120 °C, 0.1 s −1
More
Image
Published: 01 November 2010
Fig. 1 Illustration of the diffraction geometries used for x-ray pole figure measurement. (a) Reflection geometry. (b) Transmission geometry. (c) Definition of a pole in reflection ( R ) by α = 90° − χ and β = ϕ, and in transmission ( T ) by 90° − α = ω and β = χ. (d) In the Bragg-Brentano
More
Image
in Failures Related to Metal Additive Manufacturing
> Analysis and Prevention of Component and Equipment Failures
Published: 30 August 2021
Fig. 12 Electron backscatter diffraction maps (inverse pole figure: blue is 111, green is 101, and red is 001) taken from as-built 316L prepared using selective laser melting. Source: Ref 26
More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 13 X-ray pole figure characterizing nonrandom distribution of {111} poles (plane normals) in sample from rolled sheet. Contours indicate pole densities of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 times those in a randomly oriented sample. Numbers indicate local maxima. Courtesy of Mike Eatough, Sandia National
More
Image
Published: 15 June 2020
Fig. 7 Combining dissimilar metals. (a) Inverse pole figure of Al-6061 substrate. Source: Ref 67 . (b) Inverse pole figure of interface of steel 4130 foil welded on Al-6061 substrate showing the extensive and localized grain refinement in the Al-6061 substrate (marked in white dashed lines
More
Image
Published: 15 June 2020
Fig. 5 Crystallographic orientation map corresponding to inverse pole figure for face-centered cubic nickel obtained on cross section of electron-beam-melted build obtained through electron backscatter diffraction. Source: Ref 47
More
1