1-20 of 243 Search Results for

pole figure

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 15 December 2019
Fig. 1 Inverse pole figure orientation map and pole figures from a grain-oriented electrical steel transformer. (a) Inverse pole figure orientation map with respect to the rolling direction. (b) {001}, {110}, and {111} pole figures extracted from the electron backscatter diffraction map data More
Image
Published: 01 January 1986
Fig. 8 Measured (111) pole figure for Cu-3Zn. Source: Ref 2 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1986
Fig. 11 (111) pole figure for copper 10100 tubing taken from the midwall. More
Image
Published: 01 January 1986
Fig. 12 (111) pole figure for copper 10100 tubing taken from the inside wall. More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 3 (111) pole figure of the ideal rolling components (including symmetrically equivalent orientations) More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 4 (111) pole figure corresponding to simulated rolling reductions of 63%, 86%, and 95% (ε 33 = −1, −2, −3, respectively) using the full constraints (FC), relaxed constraints (RC), and self-consistent (SC) approaches More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 5 (002) pole figure of all variants of the bcc α phase formed from an (001)[100] oriented face-centered cubic (fcc) γ crystal following the Bain and Kurdjumov-Sachs (K-S) relationships More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 8 {111} pole figure of a cold-rolled copper plate (scale is in units of times random) More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 10 (a) Orientation distribution function (ODF). (b) {111} pole figure. (c) {111} fiber plot showing the texture of an aluminum thin film More
Image
Published: 31 October 2011
Fig. 11 Inverse pole figure of an unconsolidated portion of the nickel-nickel interface. Note the extremely fine grains that are present along the defect boundaries. Source: Ref 53 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2009
Fig. 26 Titanium annealed in a magnetic field. (a) {0002} pole figure for the titanium sheet sample corresponding to the initial texture. (b) and (c) Simulated pole figures after 10 min annealing at 750 °C for a two-dimensional titanium polycrystal. (b) without field. (c) In a magnetic field More
Image
Published: 01 December 2009
Fig. 3 Electron backscatter diffraction inverse-pole-figure map for alloy 718 with an initial grain size of 200 µm deformed in torsion at 980 °C, 1 s −1 to an effective strain of 0.7 and then held for 140 s. Boundary misorientations are indicated in light gray (2°) to dark gray or red (12 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2009
Fig. 4 Electron backscatter diffraction inverse-pole-figure maps for Nimonic 80A showing the deformed (top) and recrystallized (bottom) fraction as a function of the indicated strains. The black areas represent the corresponding second fraction. Coherent twins have been removed. The width More
Image
Published: 01 December 2009
Fig. 7 Electron backscatter diffraction inverse-pole-figure map for alloy 718 with an initial grain size of 50 µm deformed in uniaxial compression at 980 °C, 0.01 s −1 to a true strain of 0.4. Boundary misorientations are indicated in light gray (2°) to dark gray or red (12°) to black (≥15 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2009
Fig. 8 (a),(b) Electron backscatter diffraction inverse-pole-figure map for Waspaloy ingot material that was deformed in uniaxial compression at 1120 °C, 0.01 s −1 to a true strain of 0.27. (c) Optical micrograph showing Waspaloy ingot material that was deformed at 1120 °C, 0.1 s −1 More
Image
Published: 01 November 2010
Fig. 1 Illustration of the diffraction geometries used for x-ray pole figure measurement. (a) Reflection geometry. (b) Transmission geometry. (c) Definition of a pole in reflection ( R ) by α = 90° − χ and β = ϕ, and in transmission ( T ) by 90° − α = ω and β = χ. (d) In the Bragg-Brentano More
Image
Published: 30 August 2021
Fig. 12 Electron backscatter diffraction maps (inverse pole figure: blue is 111, green is 101, and red is 001) taken from as-built 316L prepared using selective laser melting. Source: Ref 26 More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 13 X-ray pole figure characterizing nonrandom distribution of {111} poles (plane normals) in sample from rolled sheet. Contours indicate pole densities of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 times those in a randomly oriented sample. Numbers indicate local maxima. Courtesy of Mike Eatough, Sandia National More
Image
Published: 15 June 2020
Fig. 7 Combining dissimilar metals. (a) Inverse pole figure of Al-6061 substrate. Source: Ref 67 . (b) Inverse pole figure of interface of steel 4130 foil welded on Al-6061 substrate showing the extensive and localized grain refinement in the Al-6061 substrate (marked in white dashed lines More
Image
Published: 15 June 2020
Fig. 5 Crystallographic orientation map corresponding to inverse pole figure for face-centered cubic nickel obtained on cross section of electron-beam-melted build obtained through electron backscatter diffraction. Source: Ref 47 More