Search Results for plastic strain

Fig. 6 Flow stress as a function of (a) plastic work or (b) plastic strain for an aluminum alloy 6111-T4 sheet sample measured in balanced biaxial tension (bulge test) and uniaxial tension for directions at every 15° from the rolling direction. (c) Fit of Voce law to bulge-test data over two More

Fig. 18 Temperature dependence of flow stresses for equivalent true plastic strain ε p , of 0.002, 0.04, 0.08, 0.16, and 0.24. Source: Ref 16 More

Fig. 6 Equivalent plastic strain distribution for straight tools (flat dies). (a) Section in die plane. (b) 45° to die plane. Courtesy of GFM-GmbH More

Fig. 7 Equivalent plastic strain distribution for 8° entrance angle on tool. (a) Section in die plane. (b) 45° to die plane. Courtesy of GFM GmbH More

Fig. 26 Changes of plastic strain rate within each cycle. Source: Ref 146 More

Fig. 5 True stress versus plastic strain (log-log coordinates) More

Fig. 15 True stress versus plastic strain for cyclic response (log-log coordinates) More

Fig. 19 Log plastic strain versus log reversals to failure of 4340 steel. Source: Fatigue Design Handbook , SAE More

Fig. 31 Hysteresis loop illustrating development of plastic strain from initial “elastic” response More

Fig. 10 Effect of global plastic strain on E / E 0 for differently heat-treated MB78 + 15% 13 mm SiC p DRA materials. SA, solution annealed; UA, underaged; OA, overaged. Source: Ref 12 More

Fig. 63 Installation of the drawform stud. The plastic strain is shown as the shaded color. More

Fig. 12 Plastic-strain ratio ( r ) versus limiting draw ratio for different metals. Source: Ref 1 More

Fig. 44 Close-up view of finite element (FE) predicted plastic strain distribution after flat hemming More

Fig. 10 Correlation of von Mises plastic strain and bonded area. Source: Ref 24 More

Fig. 12 Distribution of plastic strain as a function of location and vibration cycle. The X -direction is parallel to the sonotrode vibration direction. The origin is the center of the contact surface. Source: Ref 25 More

Fig. 31 Calculated accumulated plastic strain along the cross section where residual stress measurements were conducted. Source: Ref 75 More

Fig. 19 Predicted temperature, hoop stress, and equivalent plastic strain (PEEQ) for modeled elastic-plastic material at the end of 3 s heating period. More

Fig. 20 Predicted temperature, hoop stress, and equivalent plastic strain (PEEQ) for modeled elastic-plastic material after spray quenching the heated material in Fig. 19 . More

Fig. 32 Dependence of stress for first detectable plastic strain (∼0.0001) on retained austenite content. OQ, oil quenched; T, tempered; AQ, air quenched. Source: Ref 60 More

Fig. 14 Computed plastic strain contours for growth of lath martensite in a ferrous alloy. Source: Ref 65 More