Search Results for permeability

Fig. 9 Effect of laser scribing on the core loss of a high-permeability grain-oriented electrical steel. Source: Ref 23 More

Fig. 7 Magnetic permeability as a function of temperature and magnetic field intensity. Source: Ref 6 More

Fig. 6 Initial permeability at 2 mT (20 G) for annealed Ni-Fe alloys More

Fig. 7 Relative initial permeability at 2 mT (20 G) for nickel-iron alloys given various heat treatments. Treatments were as follows: furnace cooled—1 h at 900 to 950 °C (1650 to 1740 °F), cooled at 100 °C/h (180 °F/h); baked—furnace cooled plus 20 h at 450 °C (840 °F); double treatment More

Fig. 9 Saturation induction and relative permeability versus coercivity for commercial available amorphous metals (AM) and crystalline soft ferromagnets. Permeabilities for amorphous metal depend on heat treatments and are indicated by shaded bars. More

Fig. 44 Initial permeability versus temperature curve for several different MnZn ferrites of varying permeabilities: A = 800, V = 1200, D = 2000, and G = 2300 More

Fig. 2 Effect of magnetic permeability on coil current (a) and efficiency (b); curves generated from computer simulation of heating a flat plate using a single leg of an inductor; 50 kW in the part under the coil face. Source: Ref 3 . More

Fig. 5 Magnetic permeability of some Fluxtrol soft-magnetic composite materials as a function of magnetic field strength. More

Fig. 11 Effect of carbon pickup on permeability. Source: Ref 13 More

Fig. 7 Schematic of gas permeability testing apparatus More

Fig. 19 Permeability as a function of bulk density (metal powder). Increases in bulk density reduce permeability of a material. Unless properly accounted for during bin selection, increased bulk density and reduced permeability can interrupt predictable flow. More

Fig. 5 Lea and Nurse permeability apparatus with manometer and flowmeter More

Fig. 7 Blaine air permeability apparatus. Source Ref 24 More

Fig. 8 Induction and relative magnetic permeability of some ferromagnetic steels as a function of magnetic field strength. 1, (0.23% C); 2, (1.78% C). Source: Ref 10 More

Fig. 11 Function φ( t ) for the evaluation of relative permeability of medium-carbon steel as a function of temperature and magnetic field intensity. Source: Ref 10 More

Fig. 12 Distribution of relative magnetic permeability within a ferromagnetic body. H 0 , surface magnetic field intensity (A/cm); x , distance from the surface; δ 0 , penetration depth calculated with surface permeability. Source: Ref 12 More

Fig. 6 Typical variation in relative magnetic permeability (µ r ) during induction hardening and induction tempering More

Fig. 19 Moisture vapor permeability cup. Courtesy of the Paul N. Gardner Company (Gardco). Source: Ref 9 More

Fig. 9 Relative magnetic permeability as a function of magnetic field intensity (range 100 to 1500 A/in., or 39 to 590 A/cm) and temperature (range 10 to 750 °C, or 50 to 1382 °F). Source: Ref 55 More

Fig. 10 Distribution after 100 s (sand permeability = 1 × 10 −7 N · s/m 4 ). (a) Temperature (°C). (b) Current local rate of gas generated ( w g is defined by Eq 9 ). (c) Average local gas concentration ( c g is defined by Eq 9 ) More