Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
peel testing
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Book Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 331
Search Results for peel testing
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Image
Published: 15 June 2020
Fig. 9 Peel testing. (a) Schematic illustration of the peel test. Source: Ref 23 . (b) Typical peel test load-displacement curve for a sample fabricated with an optimized parameter set versus a nonoptimized parameter set
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2001
Image
Published: 31 October 2011
Fig. 9 Peel test applied to ultrasonic additive manufacturing builds. (a) Schematic of floating roller peel test. Source: Ref 10 . (b) Typical peel test force-displacement curve
More
Image
Published: 31 October 2011
Image
Published: 31 October 2011
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 2 Typical peel test specimens. (a) Stripping strength specimen (ASTM D 903). (b) Roller drum peel test specimen (ASTM D 3167). (c) T-peel test specimen (ASTM D 1876). Source: Ref 7
More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 24
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 15 June 2020
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v24.a0006574
EISBN: 978-1-62708-290-7
... with a discussion on the process fundamentals and process parameters of UAM. It then describes metallurgical aspects in UAM. The article provides a detailed description of a wide range of mechanical characterization techniques of UAM, namely tensile testing, peel testing, and pushpin testing. The article ends...
Abstract
Ultrasonic additive manufacturing (UAM) is a solid-state hybrid manufacturing technique that leverages the principles of ultrasonic welding, mechanized tape layering, and computer numerical control (CNC) machining operations to create three-dimensional metal parts. This article begins with a discussion on the process fundamentals and process parameters of UAM. It then describes metallurgical aspects in UAM. The article provides a detailed description of a wide range of mechanical characterization techniques of UAM, namely tensile testing, peel testing, and pushpin testing. The article ends with information on sensor embedding.
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 6A
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 31 October 2011
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v06a.a0005605
EISBN: 978-1-62708-174-0
.... These methods include peel testing, push-pin testing, and microhardness/nanohardness testing. The article also reviews the issues to be addressed in maintaining UAM fabrication quality. fabrication quality machining mechanical properties metal tape metallurgical properties microhardness testing...
Abstract
The ultrasonic additive manufacturing (UAM) process consists of building up solid metal objects by ultrasonically welding successive layers of metal tape into a three-dimensional shape with periodic machining operations to create detailed features of the resultant object. This article provides information on the materials, welding parameters, process consumables, procedures, and applications of the UAM. It describes the methods for determining metallurgical and mechanical properties of solid metal parts to assess the range of materials and applications for which the process is suited. These methods include peel testing, push-pin testing, and microhardness/nanohardness testing. The article also reviews the issues to be addressed in maintaining UAM fabrication quality.
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 8
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2000
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v08.a0003324
EISBN: 978-1-62708-176-4
... in the measurement of adhesive joint strength. These include qualitative tests, peel tests, lap shear tests, tensile tests, and adhesive fracture mechanics tests. adhesive fracture adhesive joints lap shear test mechanical strength peel test qualitative test tensile test MOST ENGINEERING DESIGNS...
Abstract
Adhesive joints involve joining parts by bonding component parts together with an adhesive. This article provides a discussion on the purpose of testing adhesive joints and on the factors influencing mechanical strength of these joints. It describes the various tests used in the measurement of adhesive joint strength. These include qualitative tests, peel tests, lap shear tests, tensile tests, and adhesive fracture mechanics tests.
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 9
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 December 2004
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v09.a0009083
EISBN: 978-1-62708-177-1
... the differences in the constituents and resin intermingling. The article discusses the factors that govern the honeycomb core movement and honeycomb core crush, with illustrations. Some common tests performed on honeycomb composites to characterize the skin-to-core bond strength are the climbing drum peel...
Abstract
Honeycomb-cored sandwich panels increase part stiffness at a lower weight than monolithic composite materials. This article illustrates an area of a honeycomb-cored sandwich structure composite cross section that is viewed using transmitted polarized light. This area shows the differences in the constituents and resin intermingling. The article discusses the factors that govern the honeycomb core movement and honeycomb core crush, with illustrations. Some common tests performed on honeycomb composites to characterize the skin-to-core bond strength are the climbing drum peel and flatwise tensile tests. The article concludes with a description on the reasons for core failure, which are analyzed after these tests.
Image
Published: 30 November 2018
Fig. 4 Some typical bonded joints used in testing. (a) and (b) Single and double lap joint specimens for shear stresses. (c) Butt joint specimen for tensile stresses. (d) Peel test specimen for tensile and complex stress situations. Source: Ref 9
More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 5 Micrographs of an unprepared honeycomb sandwich composite structure after climbing drum peel testing showing the adhesive surface after failure and the separated honeycomb core. Dark-field illumination, 65 mm macrophotograph
More
Image
in Coatings for Commercial Structures and Building Deficiencies that Affect Performance
> Protective Organic Coatings
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 24 Immersion testing of a peeling coating sample containing polyvinyl acetate block filler shows very poor moisture resistance (the white coat is the block filler).
More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 6 (a) Micrograph of a honeycomb sandwich structure composite after climbing drum peel testing showing areas of the core remaining on the aramid fiber composite facesheet. The microcrack pattern of the composite facesheet was enhanced by the use of DYKEM Steel Red dye, which was applied
More
Book Chapter
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 8
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2000
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v08.a0003280
EISBN: 978-1-62708-176-4
... that the work of adhesion can be done by applying a large force over a small distance (uniform tension) or a small force over a large distance (as in peeling or sliding). In a similar way, the fracture threshold also depends on the mode of separation, such as tension versus shear. Therefore, an adhesion test...
Abstract
This article describes measurement techniques for the three basic types of adhesion: fundamental adhesion, thermodynamic adhesion, and practical adhesion. It discusses common measurement methods for each type of adhesion with the main focus on practical adhesion testing of coatings and thin films. The article provides an insight into the mechanisms of environmentally induced interfacial degradation by discussing the fundamental aspects of adhesion between two dissimilar materials. It examines the use of adhesion tests in the evaluation of stress-corrosion cracking within bimaterial interfaces. Testing techniques for <i>in situ</i> environmental testing of thin-film adhesion are also reviewed.
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 6A
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 31 October 2011
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v06a.a0005628
EISBN: 978-1-62708-174-0
... are: Chisel test Peel (roller) test Bend test Temperature monitoring of a seam weld As illustrated in Fig. 11 for a chisel test, a chisel is forced into the gap at the faying interface between two adjacent welds until the weld fractures, which results in either a weld button or interfacial...
Abstract
This article presents the structural attributes and internal characteristics of spot welds as well as the commonly inspected imperfections in resistance welds. It describes the industrial requirements for weld quality. Commonly performed destructive evaluations, namely, manual testing, quasi-static mechanical tests, dynamic mechanical tests, and metallographic examination, are reviewed. The article reviews weld-quality monitoring using various process signals and provides a discussion on the on-line and off-line nondestructive evaluation methods of spot weld quality.
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 6
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1993
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v06.a0001466
EISBN: 978-1-62708-173-3
..., if not all, peel-ply surfaces are inadequate for adhesive bonding. This is a contentious issue because many bonded composite structures are so thin that the laminate or honey-comb core fails first during testing, even when the bond is less than 10% effective. However, that is often not the case in service...
Abstract
Successful adhesive bonding of organic-matrix composites is dependent on the nature of the adherend surfaces. This article emphasizes the critical importance of proper surface preparation in both thermoset and thermoplastic composites. It provides information on surface preparation for thermoset composite adherends along with a standard technique (water-break test) for verifying the adequacy of surface preparation for metal bonding. In addition, the article provides examples of good and bad adhesive bonds and describes some important process variables that are considered and controlled in bonding process for thermoset adhesives. The article concludes with a discussion on three different approaches for bonding thermoplastic composite composite panels together.
1