1-20 of 642 Search Results for

offset yield strength

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 30 June 2023
Fig. 10 0.2% offset yield strength versus temperature for three build directions and two heat treatment conditions More
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 11 Stress-strain diagram for determination of yield strength by the offset method. o - m is the specified offset. To determine offset yield strength, draw line m - n parallel to the line o - A . From the intersection point r , draw a horizontal line to determine the offset yield More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 6 C-curves for 99.5% maximum yield strength (0.2% offset) of 7175-T73, 7050-T76, and 7075-T73. Source: Ref 8 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 5(b) Effect of temperature on the yield strength (0.2% offset) of selected MA ODS alloys. Data is for longitudinal direction. More
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 9 Method of determining yield strength by the offset method (adaptation of Fig. 21 in ASTM E 8) More
Image
Published: 15 June 2019
Fig. 1 C-curves for 99.5% maximum yield strength (0.2% offset) of alloys 7175-T73, 7050-T76, and 7075-T73. Source: Ref 2 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 10 Yield strength at 0.2% offset of five candidate compressor blade alloys compared with that of 12Cr-0.6Mo steel. Source: Ref 14 More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 9 Longitudinal room temperature tensile yield strength at 0.2% plastic offset of HATS as depending on hardness. Circles, conventional HATS; triangles, PM HATS More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 10 Room temperature compressive yield strength at 0.2% plastic offset of HATS as depending on hardness More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 11 Compressive yield strength at 0.2% plastic offset for a PM HIP cold working and a PM HIP high speed steel at 62 HRC. Circles, cold working steel; squares, HSS More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 8
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2000
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v08.a0003264
EISBN: 978-1-62708-176-4
..., which includes offset yield strength, extension-under-load yield strength, and upper yield strength. The article concludes with a description of the general procedures for conducting the tension test based on ASTM standards and the variability of tensile properties. ductility elongation...
Book Chapter

By G.R. Speich
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 1
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1990
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v01.a0001026
EISBN: 978-1-62708-161-0
... steels exhibit continuous yielding behavior, a low 0.2% offset yield strength, and a higher total elongation than other HSLA steels of similar strength. The article discusses some of the more pertinent aspects of dual-phase steels, such as heat treatment, microstructure, mechanical properties, chemical...
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
mm (2 in.), % 28.9 17.8 Reduction in area, % 57.7 25.8 Hardness, HB 92 89 (a) Lower yield point. (b) 0.1% offset yield strength More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 7 Mechanical properties of various cast corrosion-resistant steels at room temperature. (a) Tensile strength. (b) 0.2% offset yield strength. (b) 0.2% offset yield strength. (c) Charpy keyhole impact energy. (d) Brinell hardness. (e) Elongation. Also given are the heat treatments used More
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 1 Effect of temperature on strength and ductility of various materials. (a) 0.2 offset yield strength. (b) Tensile elongation. Source: Ref 2 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 25 Mechanical properties of cast corrosion-resistant steels at room temperature. (a) Tensile strength. (b) 0.2% offset yield strength. (c) Charpy keyhole impact energy. (d) Brinell hardness. (e) Elongation. Also given are the heat; FC, furnace cool; WQ, water quench; A, anneal; T, temper. More
Image
Published: 31 August 2017
(dashed) is the 0.2% offset yield strength. PL, proportionality limits. Source: Ref 17 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
(dashed) is the 0.2% offset yield strength. PL, proportionality limits. Source: Ref 16 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1997
Fig. 25 Schematic of logic employed in design against “failure”. Failure can take place by either material permanent deformation or fracture. Thus design entails comparing the 2% offset yield strength (σ y ) to the nominal stress at which fracture occurs (σ F ), and then using the lower More
Image