1-20 of 271 Search Results for

microhardness measurements

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 9 Schematic of the plane illustrating the grid of microhardness measurements surrounding the macroindentation More
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 10 Contours of microhardness measurements revealing the plastic zone size beneath static and dynamic indentations. (a) 2024 aluminum, static indentation. (b) 2024 aluminum, dynamic indentation. (c) 316 stainless steel, static indentation. (d) 316 stainless steel, dynamic indentation More
Image
Published: 01 November 2010
Fig. 62 Microhardness measurements and QSIM prediction comparison at various locations of the gear shown in Fig. 61 . Source: Ref 161 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 23 Use of microhardness indents to measure disector thickness. (a) Microhardness indents placed in the first large-area disector (LAD) plane become smaller in the second LAD plane (b). The change in the size of the indents can be used to compute the amount of material removed (i.e., LAD More
Image
Published: 01 January 1989
and a plastically deformed layer totalling 0.04 mm (0.0015 in.) deep are visible. 1000×. (c) Microhardness measurements show a total affected zone 0.08 mm (0.003 in.) deep from abusive conditions. Source: Ref 9 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1989
conditions produce globs of recast metal and a white layer of rehardened martensite 0.075 mm (0.003 in.) deep. 620×. (c) Microhardness measurements show a total heat-affected zone approaching 0.25 mm (0.010 in.). Globs of recast and the white layer are at 62 HRC. An overtempered zone as soft as 46 HRC More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 4A
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 August 2013
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v04a.a0005795
EISBN: 978-1-62708-165-8
... methods of measuring case depth in steels, including chemical methods such as the combustion analysis and spectrographic analysis, microhardness test method, macroscopic and microscopic visual methods, and nondestructive methods. It contains a table that provides approximate equivalent hardness numbers...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 8
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2000
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v08.a0003302
EISBN: 978-1-62708-176-4
... under (a) static loading and (b) dynamic loading. The numbers next to the data points refer to metals and alloys listed in Fig. 6 . Characteristics of the Indentation Plastic Zone To estimate the differences in plastic zone size with respect to the loading rate, microhardness measurements...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 4A
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 August 2013
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v04a.a0005798
EISBN: 978-1-62708-165-8
... Abstract This article presents the different hardness test methods used to measure the effectiveness of surface carbon control in carburized parts of steel. Common test methods include Rockwell hardness measurements, superficial Rockwell 15N testing, and microhardness testing. The article...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 4C
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 09 June 2014
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v04c.a0005863
EISBN: 978-1-62708-167-2
... and power for induction hardening, and describes common methods for measuring case depth, such as optical and microhardness, and surface hardness. It provides information on some complications and ambiguities associated with these measurements. The article also discusses the commonly used non-destructive...
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 17 Plot of expected measurement error as a function of effective case depth to 50 HRC derived from interlaboratory microhardness traverse gage repeatability and reproducibility study on samples with 1.3 and 3.2 mm (0.05 and 0.125 in.) effective case depth. A typical allowable range More
Image
Published: 09 June 2014
Fig. 39 Typical effective case depth measurement in an induction surface-hardened part with thick cases determined from microhardness traverse at the root of gear. Courtesy of Element Materials Technology More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 5A
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 August 2013
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v05a.a0005730
EISBN: 978-1-62708-171-9
... Superficial hardness E384 Microhardness E1920 Metallographic preparation E2109 Microstructural evaluation G59 Microstructural evaluation G106 Microstructural evaluation B117 Microstructural evaluation Hardness Testing Hardness measurement of thermal spray coatings...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 5
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1994
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v05.a0001237
EISBN: 978-1-62708-170-2
... polish is recommended. Microhardness testing is a useful technique in characterizing different phases, and it has also been used to determine the fracture toughness in brittle materials. Fracture toughness is determined by initiating a controlled crack, then breaking the specimen, or by measuring...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 14B
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2006
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v14b.a0009001
EISBN: 978-1-62708-186-3
... microhardness tester must be used. Unfortunately, the currently available portable microhardness testers exhibit some limitations in the measurable hardness range, accuracy, and operation conditions. Further research and development efforts are needed for accurate, fast, and easy nondestructive microhardness...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 8
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2000
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v08.a0003275
EISBN: 978-1-62708-176-4
... acceptable. The decarburized layer was thus the cause of heat checking, and corrective measures were applied to the heat treating procedure. Capabilities of Ultrasonic Microhardness Testing There are several advantages of the ultrasonic hardness testing system. With ultrasonic hardness testing, one...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 14B
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2006
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v14b.a0009000
EISBN: 978-1-62708-186-3
.../binder forces and die wear as a function of drawing, and measurements of the initial and final microhardness of the draw bead surfaces. Details of the direct measurement techniques are described in this section. Indirect nondestructive measurement techniques for plant monitoring are presented...
Image
Published: 09 June 2014
Fig. 40 Typical hardness distribution for a thick carburized case. The total case depth determined by microhardness is approximately 1 mm (0.04 in.). Note that the case hardness of this carburized case varies significantly due to changes in retained austenite content (at near-zero depth More
Image
Published: 01 October 2014
, indicating lattice expansion. No peaks associated with carbides are evident in the case. (b) Microhardness profile as a function of depth. Measurements were taken from multiple components from a single process run. Superimposed curves of carbon concentration (X C , at.%) and residual compressive stress (σ 11 More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 5
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1994
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v05.a0001239
EISBN: 978-1-62708-170-2
... not mean that the effects of burn are removed. Microhardness measurements on workpieces show that visible burn is accompanied by reaustenitization of the work surface during grinding. When hardened steels are ground without any burning, there is generally some softening due to tempering of the material...