Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
martensitic alloys
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Book Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 1013 Search Results for
martensitic alloys
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Book: Fatigue and Fracture
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 19
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1996
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v19.a0002396
EISBN: 978-1-62708-193-1
... between microstructure and fatigue resistance. These alloys classes include ferritic-pearlitic alloys, martensitic alloys, maraging steels, and metastable austenitic alloys. The article also discusses the role of internal defects and selective surface processing in influencing fatigue performance...
Abstract
This article reviews general trends in the cyclic response for representative commercial alloys to establish the spectrum of cyclic properties attainable through microstructural alteration. Individual alloy classes are examined in detail to assess the understanding of relationships between microstructure and fatigue resistance. These alloys classes include ferritic-pearlitic alloys, martensitic alloys, maraging steels, and metastable austenitic alloys. The article also discusses the role of internal defects and selective surface processing in influencing fatigue performance.
Image
Published: 01 January 1989
Fig. 11 Effect of manganese content on the corrosion of free-machining stainless steels in a 10% nitric acid solution at 24 °C (75 °F). 1, 13% Cr martensitic alloy; 2, 17% Cr ferritic alloy; 3, 18Cr-9Ni austenitic alloy. Source: Ref 14
More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 13 Cavitation erosion resistance of various types of stainless steels. For martensitic alloys tempering temperature and for the ferritic alloys annealing temperature are indicated in the figure. Source: Ref 107
More
Book: Machining
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 16
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1989
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v16.a0002180
EISBN: 978-1-62708-188-7
... Abstract The machinability of stainless steels varies from low to very high, depending on the final choice of the alloy. This article discusses general material and machining characteristics of stainless steel. It briefly describes the classes of stainless steel, such as ferritic, martensitic...
Abstract
The machinability of stainless steels varies from low to very high, depending on the final choice of the alloy. This article discusses general material and machining characteristics of stainless steel. It briefly describes the classes of stainless steel, such as ferritic, martensitic, austenitic, duplex, and precipitation-hardenable alloys. The article examines the role of additives, such as sulfur, selenium, tellurium, lead, bismuth, and certain oxides, in improving machining performance. It provides ways to minimize difficulties involved in the traditional machining of stainless steels. The article describes turning, drilling, tapping, milling, broaching, reaming, and grinding operations on stainless steel. It concludes with information on some of the nontraditional machining techniques, including abrasive jet machining, abrasive waterjet machining electrochemical machining, electron beam machining, and plasma arc machining.
Book Chapter
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 4D
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 October 2014
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v04d.a0005985
EISBN: 978-1-62708-168-9
... Abstract Martensitic stainless steels are the least corrosion-resistant of all stainless alloys. The traditional martensitic stainless steels are iron/chromium/carbon alloys, sometimes with a small amount of nickel and/or molybdenum. This article provides an overview on the influences...
Abstract
Martensitic stainless steels are the least corrosion-resistant of all stainless alloys. The traditional martensitic stainless steels are iron/chromium/carbon alloys, sometimes with a small amount of nickel and/or molybdenum. This article provides an overview on the influences of the various possible alloying elements on the key properties of martensitic stainless steels. It describes the various preparation processes, namely, atmosphere selection, cleaning, and preheating, prior to heat treatment for these steels. Common heat treatment methods include annealing, hardening, tempering, and stress relieving. The article lists the compositions of casting alloys and also describes the effect of tempering temperature on the hardness, strength, ductility, and toughness properties of the alloys.
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 6 Plate martensite formed in an Fe-1.86C alloy. Arrows indicate microcracks. Source: Ref 6 . Reprinted with permission
More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 8 Micrograph of plate martensite in an Fe-20Ni-1.2C alloy after cooling at 4 K. Source: Ref 7
More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 19 Microstructure of lath martensite in an Fe-0.2C alloy after tempering at 700 °C (1290 °F) for 2 h. Nital etch. Magnification: 500×. Source: Ref 3
More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 4 Fe-1.86C alloy color etched with 2% nital to reveal plate martensite within austenite grains and ledeburite in the grain boundaries. 500×. (A.O. Benscoter)
More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 27 Ti-6Al-4V alloy containing martensite needles formed at elevated temperature (>840 °C, or 1540 °F). Color etched in 100 mL H 2 O, 4 mL HCl, 3 g NH 4 HF 2 . Polarized light illumination. 100×. (G. Müller)
More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 33 AF 1410 alloy steel. (a) Highly tempered lath martensite is difficult to study under bright-field illumination. (b) Crossed polarized light reveals the packet size by contrast differences. Tint etched in 10% Na 2 S 2 O 5 . 100×
More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 58 Low-contrast microstructure (tempered martensite in a medium-carbon alloy steel) photographed with a medium-contrast film (Tri-X Ortho) and printed with paper grades: (a) F1 (low contrast), (b) F2, (c) F3, and (d) F4 (high contrast). 500×
More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 14 Martensite formed on the free polished surface of High-Expansion 22-3 alloy after refrigeration to −73 °C (−100 °F) to convert any unstable austenite to martensite. The specimen was brought back to room temperature, cleaned, and viewed with Nomarski differential interference contrast
More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 28 Lath martensite microstructure of a low-density powder metallurgy alloy steel gear that was tint etched with Klemm's I and viewed with polarized light plus sensitive tint. Note that prior-particle shapes are quite visible due to the low density.
More
Image
Published: 30 September 2014
Fig. 74 Microstructure of quenched AISI 8630 alloy steel consisting of martensite with cracking initiating from a rolling seam. Source: Ref 42
More
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 2 Effect of carbon content in iron-carbon alloys on the martensite start (M s ) temperature, the relative proportions of lath and plate martensite, and the volume percent retained austenite. Source: Ref 1
More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 6 Effect of alloy content on martensite start (M s ) temperature of binary alloys. Tantalum has the least effect, while iron depresses the M s at the greatest rate. These rates correlate with strengthening in β-stabilized systems.
More
1