Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
machinability ratings
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Book Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 2113 Search Results for
machinability ratings
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Image
Published: 30 November 2018
Fig. 4 Typical chips for machinability ratings A to E. All chips were made with 20° rake cutting tool at 2.54 mm (0.100 in.) depth of cut.
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 4 Correlations among machinability ratings for different materials based on recommended speeds for turning and for boring with HSS tools. See text for details. Turning Boring Turning Boring 95 94 62 56 100 100 57 56 148 141 53 44 90 88 88 85 162 159
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1989
Fig. 1 Typical chips for machinability ratings A to E ( Tables 1(a) , 1(b) ) for aluminum alloys. All chips were made with 20° rake tool and 2.54 mm (0.100 in.) depth of cut. Machinability rating Alloy Speed, m/min (sfm) Feed, mm/rev (in./rev) Left photo Right photo
More
Book Chapter
Book: Machining
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 16
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1989
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v16.a0002173
EISBN: 978-1-62708-188-7
... Abstract High removal rate (HRR) machining involves the use of extremely rigid, high-power, high-precision machines, such as roll turning lathes, to achieve material removal rates far beyond the capacity of conventional machine tools. This article reviews the machine requirements and cutting...
Abstract
High removal rate (HRR) machining involves the use of extremely rigid, high-power, high-precision machines, such as roll turning lathes, to achieve material removal rates far beyond the capacity of conventional machine tools. This article reviews the machine requirements and cutting parameters of HRR machining. Machine components such as the lathe bed, tailstock, headstock, carriage, and tooling are detailed. The article also discusses the applications of HRR machining.
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 1
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1990
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v01.a0001033
EISBN: 978-1-62708-161-0
... of the various attributes of carbon and alloy steels on machining characteristics. It lists the relative machinability ratings for some plain carbon steels, standard resulfurized steels, and several alloy steels. The addition of lead to carbon steels is one of the means of increasing the machinability...
Abstract
The machinability of carbon and alloy steels is affected by many factors, such as the composition, microstructure, and strength level of the steel; the feeds, speeds, and depth of cut; and the choice of cutting fluid and cutting tool material. This article describes the influence of the various attributes of carbon and alloy steels on machining characteristics. It lists the relative machinability ratings for some plain carbon steels, standard resulfurized steels, and several alloy steels. The addition of lead to carbon steels is one of the means of increasing the machinability of the steel and improving the surface finish of machined parts. Low carbon content of carburizing steels may be beneficial to tool life and production rate. The sulfur content of through-hardening alloy steels can significantly affect machining behavior. Cold drawing generally improves the machinability of steels containing less than about 0.2% carbon.
Book Chapter
Book: Machining
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 16
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1989
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v16.a0002185
EISBN: 978-1-62708-188-7
... Abstract This article begins with a discussion on machinability ratings of copper and copper alloys and then describes the factors influencing the machinability ratings. It explains the effect of alloying elements, cold working, and cutting fluid on the machinability of copper and copper alloys...
Abstract
This article begins with a discussion on machinability ratings of copper and copper alloys and then describes the factors influencing the machinability ratings. It explains the effect of alloying elements, cold working, and cutting fluid on the machinability of copper and copper alloys. In addition, the article provides a comprehensive discussion on various machining techniques that are employed for machining of copper and copper alloys: turning, planing, drilling, reaming, tapping and threading, multiple operation machining, milling, slitting and circular sawing, power band sawing and power hacksawing, grinding, and honing.
Book: Machining
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 16
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1989
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v16.a0002177
EISBN: 978-1-62708-188-7
... on machining operations. Their primary limitation is speed/metal removal rate, typically suffering plastic deformation at relatively low cutting speeds (30 to 60 m/min, or 100 to 200 sfm). As a result, their primary applications are in form cutters, reamers, taps, drills, and small-diameter end mills. High...
Abstract
This article discusses the factors to be considered in selecting and evaluating machining tests for the purpose of evaluating cutting tool performance and workpiece machinability. It provides a brief description of cutting tool materials, such as high-speed steels, uncoated and coated carbides, cermets, ceramics, cubic boron nitride, and polycrystalline diamond. The article considers the matrices that represent the range of tests performed on candidate cutting tool materials: the workpiece matrix, the property matrix, and the operation matrix. Various machine tests used to evaluate cutting tools, including the impact test, turning test, and facing test, are described. The article lists the factors to be taken into consideration in measuring the machinability of a material. The article presents general recommendations for proper chip groove selection on carbide tools and concludes with information on machining economics.
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 11 Influence of size and shape of sulfide inclusions on machinability. Two steels, identical in composition except for silicon content, exhibited different machinability ratings that were traced to differences in the size and shape of MnS inclusions. Source: Ref 12 Chemical
More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 33 Variation in polishing rate in a semiautomatic machine with type of polishing cloth and particle diameter of polycrystalline diamond abrasives. The specimen polished was a ferritic steel (hardness, 700 HV), and the specimen pressure was 43 kPa. Courtesy of K. Geels, Struers A/S. Source
More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 4 Three types of machines for high-energy-rate forging. (a) Ram-and-inner-frame machine. (b) Two-ram machine. (c) Controlled-energy-flow machine. Triggering and expansion of gas in the firing chamber cause the upper and lower rams to move toward each other at high velocity. An outer frame
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Image
Published: 01 January 1989
Fig. 35 Effect of work metal hardness on machining conditions, metal removal rate, and cutter life in the milling of low-alloy steels Item Face milling (a) Peripheral (slab) milling (b) End milling (c) 15 HRC 47 HRC 52 HRC 15 HRC 47 HRC 52 HRC 15 HRC 47 HRC 52 HRC
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 4 Corrosion rates of machined and nonmachined specimens of cast steels after 7 years in three environments. The effect of surface finish on corrosion rates is negligible. Source: Ref 1
More
Book Chapter
Series: ASM Desk Editions
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 December 1998
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.mhde2.a0003186
EISBN: 978-1-62708-199-3
... machining costs machining equipment machining operations metal cutting surface finish tolerance tool life tool wear rate workpiece machinability MACHINING is a term that covers a large collection of manufacturing processes designed to remove unwanted material, usually in the form of chips, from...
Abstract
Machining is a term that covers a large collection of manufacturing processes designed to remove unwanted material, usually in the form of chips, from a workpiece. This article discusses the basic classes of machining operations, including conventional, abrasive, and nontraditional, and outlines the type of costs incurred by the process. It describes the types of machining equipment, including general-purpose machine tools, production machining systems, and computer numerically controlled machining systems. The article lists the common classes of metallic work materials, in order of decreasing machinability. It also shows the range of dimensional and surface finish tolerances in graphical form that can be achieved using various machining processes under general machining conditions.
Image
Published: 01 January 1989
Fig. 7 Relationship between flank wear and cutting speed and the resulting machinability rating for three different materials Material Tool life, min Machinability rating A 50 100 B 32 64 ( 32 50 ) × 100 C 14 28 ( 14 50 ) × 100
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1989
Fig. 8 Relationship between tool life and cutting speed and the resulting machinability rating for three different materials Material Cutting speed for 60 min tool life Machinability rating m/min sfm A 189 620 100 B 146 480 77 ( 146 189 ) × 100 ( 480
More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 6 Relationship between tool life and cutting speed based on Taylor equation. Table shows how the machinability rating would be determined. Source: Ref 15 Material Casting speed for 60 min tool life Machinability rating m/min sfm A 189 620 100 B 146 480 77
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1997
Fig. 7 Relationship between tool life and cutting speed based on Taylor equation. Table shows how the machinability rating would be determined. Source: Ref 25 Material Cutting speed for 60 min tool life Machinability rating m/min sfm A 189 620 100 B 146 480 77
More
Image
Published: 30 November 2018
Fig. 17 Schematic of laser drilling approaches and their regime in terms of pulse duration and machining rate
More
1