1-20 of 881

Search Results for kinetic energy

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 8 Relationship between the kinetic energy of the particles and the erosion mass loss for AISI 316L (UNS S31603) and LDX 2101 (UNS S32101) stainless steels and various types of erodents and for certain erodents with a different size in 10 wt% slurries. Source: Ref 69 More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 22 Erosion parameter (excluding the initial kinetic energy term) calculated from Eq 1 is plotted against the experimentally determined volumetric erosion rate. Good correlation is observed for the range of materials studied here. Adapted from Ref 34 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 7 Impact force versus impacter kinetic energy for [45/0/−45/90] 6s IM7/8551-7 and AS4/3501-6 laminates and a 12.7 mm diam tup More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 11 Impact force versus impacter kinetic energy for [45/0/−45/90] ns AS4/3501-6 uniweave (RFI) and a 12.7 mm diam tup More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 12 Damage diameter versus impacter kinetic energy for [45/0/−45/90] ns AS4/3501-6 uniweave (RFI) and a 12.7 mm diam tup More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 19 Impact force versus impacter kinetic energy for [45/0/−45/90] 6s AS4/3501-6 laminates of various sizes More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 20 Minimum impacter kinetic energy to reduce burst pressure of small and large pressure vessels. More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 21 Postimpact compressive strength versus impacter kinetic energy for 6.3 mm thick AS4/3501-6 coupons and panels with three bolted spars More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 22 Damage diameter versus impacter kinetic energy for falling-weight impact tests and gas-gun tests conducted on [45/0/−45/90] 6s AS4/3501-6 laminates More
Image
Published: 15 December 2019
Fig. 5 Dependence of escape depth, λ, on kinetic energy of electrons. Data points are experimental measurements for various elements; full curve is an empirical least-squares fit. Source: Ref 27 (adapted from Ref 14 ) More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 14A
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2005
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v14a.a0003973
EISBN: 978-1-62708-185-6
... Abstract Hammers and high-energy-rate forging machines are classified as energy-restricted machines as they deform the workpiece by the kinetic energy of the hammer ram. This article provides information on gravity-drop hammers, power-drop hammers, die forger hammers, counterblow hammers...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 18
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 31 December 2017
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v18.a0006374
EISBN: 978-1-62708-192-4
... and the classifications of brake lining materials. It discusses the effect of formulation compositions and manufacturing processes and the effect of braking operation conditions. The article provides information on aircraft brake linings, which operate under a wide range of kinetic energy conditions. The morphology...
Image
Published: 31 October 2011
Fig. 5 Schematic illustrations of the three basic ways in which electrical energy, supplied by a power source, can be used to heat and fusion weld a metal, including (a) use of the kinetic energy of electrons and positive ions in an arc to bombard the workpiece and produce heat (in arc welding More
Image
Published: 31 October 2011
Fig. 10 Distribution of turbulent variables in the weld pool. (a) Dimensionless viscosity, μ t /μ. (b) Dimensionless thermal conductivity, k t / k . (c) Turbulent kinetic energy, m 2 /s 2 × 10 −4 . (d) Dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy, m 2 /s 3 × 10 −4 . Adapted from Ref 15 More
Image
Published: 15 December 2019
Fig. 10 Mean free path for inelastic scattering of electrons as a function of kinetic energy of electrons travelling in a solid. Electrons in the low-energy electron diffraction energy range travel only of the order of 0.4 to 2 nm in the crystal before losing energy and thus becoming lost More
Image
Published: 09 June 2014
Fig. 8 Measured distribution of the time averaged flow velocity and specific turbulent kinetic energy in an experimental induction crucible furnace More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 18 Calculated impact force versus natural frequency ratio squared for AS4/3501-6 [45/0/−45/90] 6s and an impacter kinetic energy = 13.5J More
Image
Published: 01 January 1986
. The kinetic energy left in a projectile of mass m after an elastic backscattering collision with an atom of mass m is a fraction k m of the incident energy ( Eq 1 and 2 ). The abscissa yields K m for a selection of elements, assuming that the projectiles are helium ions ( m = 4). Source: Ref More
Image
Published: 30 September 2014
Fig. 27 Schematic showing basic elements of an ion-nitriding system. High-kinetic-energy nitrogen-ion bombardment on the workpiece surface is indicated by blue-white glow discharge around the components. More
Image
Published: 15 December 2019
for a selection of elements. The kinetic energy left in a projectile of mass m after an elastic backscattering collision with an atom of mass m is a fraction k m of the incident energy ( Eq 1 and 2 ). The abscissa yields K m for a selection of elements, assuming that the projectiles are helium More