1-20 of 373 Search Results for

interfacial bonding

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 1997
Fig. 3 Interfacial bonding. A bundle of fibers (a) usually will have about 70 to 80% of the average tensile strength determined on a single fibers. With a very strong bond between fiber and matrix (b), the whole composite will fail in a brittle manner when the very weakest fiber More
Image
Published: 01 January 1997
Fig. 6 Effect of interfacial bonding on strength. The coupling between fiber and matrix can be increased by the time that carbon fibers are etched in nitric acid. This first published data that bend or tensile strength has a maximum with respect to increasing interlaminar shear strength has More
Image
Published: 01 June 2012
Fig. 7 Time-dependence of interfacial bond strength of various fixation systems in bone. Source: Ref 35 , 36 More
Book Chapter

By Paul J. Walsh
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 21
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2001
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v21.a0009241
EISBN: 978-1-62708-195-5
... and characteristics of carbon fibers in terms of axial structure, transverse structure, and interfacial bonding. The article discusses the typical applications of carbon fibers, including aerospace and sporting goods. It concludes with a discussion on anticipated developments in carbon fibers. aerospace...
Series: ASM Desk Editions
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 November 1995
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.emde.a0003064
EISBN: 978-1-62708-200-6
... of carbon fibers has dropped and their mechanical properties have increased. This article begins with an overview of the carbon conversion processes, fiber properties and microstructures, and interfacial bonding and environmental interaction of carbon fibers, followed by a detailed discussion on the various...
Image
Published: 01 January 1997
Fig. 15 Illustration of ceramic-matrix composite failure process. (a) The crack, which initiates in the matrix, propagates through both matrix and fibers in the composite when strong interfacial bonding exists. (b) For intermediate or low interfacial bonding, the matrix crack runs through More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 2 Relative abrasive wear loss of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) and composites filled with quartz and glass against abrasives SiC (45 μm), WIB, SiO 2 (10 μm) and CaCO 3 (3 μm) as a function of filler volume fraction, V f . WIB, weak interfacial bond; SIB, strong interfacial bond: 1 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1987
(unless the fibers are somewhat misoriented). Note that the fibers fail at angles to the fracture surface that range from almost perpendicular to very oblique. Note that all fibers retain a great deal of resin on their surfaces, which indicates that the interfacial bond was strong and that the primary More
Image
Published: 01 January 1987
and will show a variety of different features in different locations. Transverse specimens, however, can usually be found to have a clearly predominant failure type. If the fiber/matrix interfacial bond is weak, such specimens will tend to fail by debonding (interface separation). If the interface is strong More
Image
Published: 01 January 1997
Fig. 16 Stress/strain curve for a typical uniaxial ceramic-matrix composite loaded parallel to the fibers. The solid line (A) shows the behavior for strong interfacial bonding and catastrophic failure with the first matrix crack. The dotted line (B) indicates intermediate bonding behavior More
Image
Published: 01 January 1987
interfacial bond is weak, such specimens will tend to fail by debonding (interface separation). If the interface is strong, however, matrix failure will be the predominant failure mode. Most current fiber/epoxy systems have a strong interfacial bond and fail by this mode. The exception is for aramid fibers More
Image
Published: 01 January 1987
, composite failure surfaces are quite complex and will show a variety of different features in different locations. Transverse specimens, however, can usually be found to have a clearly predominant failure type. If the fiber/matrix interfacial bond is weak, such specimens will tend to fail by debonding More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 9 Schematic of debonding at a matrix-particle interface with unidirectional stress. (a) Plane-stress loading of an inclusion (no interfacial bond) causes debonding at the particle caps. (b) Debonding and fracture of high-aspect-ratio particles (elongated inclusion) due to shear transfer More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 9 Schematic of debonding at a matrix-particle interface with unidirectional stress. (a) Plane stress loading of an inclusion (no interfacial bond) causes debonding at the particle caps. (b) Debonding and fracture of high-aspect-ratio particles (elongated inclusion) due to shear transfer More
Image
Published: 01 January 2003
, but the lack of matrix adhering of the fibers indicates low interfacial bond strength. 1860× More
Series: ASM Handbook Archive
Volume: 12
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1987
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v12.a0000629
EISBN: 978-1-62708-181-8
..., can usually be found to have a clearly predominant failure type. If the fiber/matrix interfacial bond is weak, such specimens will tend to fail by debonding (interface separation). If the interface is strong, however, matrix failure will be the predominant failure mode. Most current fiber/epoxy...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 23
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 June 2012
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v23.a0005675
EISBN: 978-1-62708-198-6
... of formation of an interfacial bond of ceramic, glass, or glass-ceramic implants with bone ( Fig. 2 ). Figure 2 is discussed in more detail in the section “Bioactive Glasses and Glass-Ceramics” in this article. Note here that the term bioactive has been used to express a wide range of material reactions...
Image
Published: 01 January 1987
) direction. There is substantial epoxy adhering to the fiber surfaces, indicating that the interfacial bond strength is fairly high. SEM (same conditions as in Fig. 1294 ), 500× (The composite specimens shown in Fig. 1296 , 1297 , 1298 , 1299 , 1300 , 1301 , 1302 , 1303 , 1304 , 1305 , 1306 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1987
an adjacent one. The amount of epoxy remaining on the fibers indicated a fairly strong interfacial bond. SEM (same conditions as in Fig. 1294 ), 2000× (The composite specimens shown in Fig. 1296 , 1297 , 1298 , 1299 , 1300 , 1301 , 1302 , 1303 , 1304 , 1305 , 1306 , 1307 , 1308 , 1309 More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 18
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 31 December 2017
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v18.a0006375
EISBN: 978-1-62708-192-4
... explanation for the interfacial interactions of transition metals in contact with ceramics as well as with themselves ( Ref 2 , 3 ). When a transition metal is placed in contact with a ceramic material in an atomically clean state, the interfacial bonds formed between the metal and the ceramic depend heavily...