1-20 of 966

Search Results for impacter mass

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 23 Impact force versus impacter mass for 73 J impacts with a 25.4 mm diam tup to filled and empty 36 mm thick AS4/HBRF-55A filament-wound cases More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 9 Mass loss vs. number of compound impact cycles for aluminium 2011 T3 specimens tested against 17-4 PH stainless steel counterfaces with varying sliding velocities (impact stress 10.8 MPa). Source: Ref 5 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 10 Mass loss vs. number of compound impact cycles for 17-4 PH stainless steel counterfaces tested with CPM-10V steel specimens (impact stress 69 MPa). Source: Ref 26 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 11 Mass loss vs. sliding velocity for compound impact testing of titanium alloy RMI 5522S specimens against 17-4 PH stainless steel counterfaces (impact stress 18.6 MPa). Source: Ref 20 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 12 Mass loss vs. number of compound impact cycles for 1410 steel specimens of varying length run against 17-4 PH stainless steel counterfaces (impact stress 69 MPa; sliding velocity 10 m/s). Source: Ref 21 More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 11 Mass loss versus number of compound-impact cycles for aluminum 2011-T3 specimens tested against 17-4 PH stainless steel counterfaces with varying sliding velocities (impact stress: 10.8 MPa, or 1.6 ksi). Source: Ref 8 More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 12 Mass loss versus number of compound-impact cycles for 17-4 PH stainless steel counterfaces tested with CPM-10V steel specimens (impact stress: 69 MPa, or 10 ksi). Source: Ref 31 More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 13 Mass loss versus sliding velocity for compound-impact testing of titanium alloy RMI 5522S specimens against 17-4 PH stainless steel counterfaces (impact stress: 18.6 MPa, or ksi). Source: Ref 23 More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 14 Mass loss versus number of compound-impact cycles for 1410 steel specimens of varying length run against 17-4 PH stainless steel counterfaces (impact stress: 69 MPa, or 10 ksi; sliding velocity: 10 m/s, or 33ft/s). Source: Ref 24 More
Image
Published: 15 May 2022
Fig. 58 Ion impact removal of atoms or clusters from solid surfaces. Mass analysis of the sputtered particles is the basis of the static secondary ion mass spectrometry technique. Simultaneous x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis of the bottom of the etch crater produces chemical depth More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 19
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1996
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v19.a0002416
EISBN: 978-1-62708-193-1
... strength and tensile strength. The article reviews low velocity impacts in aircraft structures in terms of resin toughness, laminate thickness, specimen size and impactor mass, and post-impact fatigue. It explains the tension strength analysis, such as linear elastic fracture mechanics and R-curve methods...
Book Chapter

Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 18
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 31 December 2017
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v18.a0006359
EISBN: 978-1-62708-192-4
... Abstract Impact wear can be defined as the wear of a solid surface that is due to percussion, which is a repetitive exposure to dynamic contact by another solid body. This article discusses the volume (or mass) removal of material either at or under engineering contact stress levels...
Book Chapter

By Peter J. Blau
Series: ASM Desk Editions
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 December 1998
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.mhde2.a0003242
EISBN: 978-1-62708-199-3
... an explanation on mechanisms, forms (sliding, impact, and rolling) and the causes of wear. It describes the wear measuring methods, including the mass loss method, wear width method, and scar depth method. The units used to report wear vary with type of wear and with the purpose for which the data are to be used...
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 2 Typical dependence of erosion (defined as mass lost per unit mass of impinging particles) on impact angle (defined as the angle between the impact direction and the surface) More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 8
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2000
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v08.a0003284
EISBN: 978-1-62708-176-4
... incubation period when the specimen gains mass. Important Variables in Erosion Erosion, defined as mass removed from the surface per unit mass of impacting particles, depends strongly on the following: Particle impact velocity Particle impact angle Particle size, shape, and material...
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 32 The principle of operation of a 3D atom probe. The x and y coordinates of each atom are determined from the impact position on the position-sensitive detector. The z coordinate is determined from its position in the evaporation sequence. The mass-to-charge ratio and hence More
Image
Published: 30 June 2023
Fig. 14 Impact of drying and saturation on the weight of binder-jet-printed parts with and without heating. In unheated powder beds (NH), the mass of the parts increases linearly with saturation for all thicknesses. With powder-bed heating (H), the normalized mass of the parts more than one More
Series: ASM Handbook Archive
Volume: 11
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2002
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v11.a0003565
EISBN: 978-1-62708-180-1
... While mass loss in impact wear mainly results from wear debris arising from the subsurface zones, wear also occurs as a result of plastic deformation and subsequent “mushrooming” of the impacting bodies, leading to the creation of leading and trailing edges (see Fig. 4 ) ( Ref 5 , 6 , 11...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 18
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 31 December 2017
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v18.a0006384
EISBN: 978-1-62708-192-4
.... Mass Loss and Advanced Periods of Erosion During the incubation period, that is, for relatively small exposure times (see the section “ Pitting and Incubation Period ” in this article), cavitation damage in metals is mostly characterized by plastic deformations. Although the most intense impacts...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 11
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 15 January 2021
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v11.a0006793
EISBN: 978-1-62708-295-2
... plastic flow may occur in the counterface, where shoulders can form of material removed from the contact zone that is no longer load bearing but would not be measured as lost mass. Fig. 4 Schematic diagrams of the different mechanisms of impact wear. Source: Ref 14 Fig. 5 Model of lost...