1-20 of 403 Search Results for

hexagonal close-packed

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 November 1995
Fig. 1 Cubic closed-packed (a and b) and hexagonal close-packed (c and d) lattices indicating the positions of tetrahedral (a and c) and octahedral (b and d) interstices More
Image
Published: 15 December 2019
Fig. 15 Microstructure of as-polished wrought, pure hexagonal close-packed hafnium specimen viewed in polarized light plus sensitive tint reveals an equiaxed alpha grain structure and a few mechanical twins at the surface (yellow arrows). More
Image
Published: 15 December 2019
Fig. 16 Microstructure of as-polished wrought, pure hexagonal close-packed magnesium specimen viewed in cross-polarized light using a microscope with a Foster prism and a sensitive tint plate. Note the change in direction of the mechanical twins at the grain boundary. More
Image
Published: 15 December 2019
Fig. 18 Microstructure of as-polished, as-cast pure hexagonal close-packed tin specimen viewed using polarized light (note the mechanical twins) More
Image
Published: 01 January 1993
Fig. 13 Diagram of the unit cell for a hexagonal close-packed crystal showing basal, prism, and pyramidal planes. The c / a ratio of the unit cell for alpha-titanium is affected by the presence of interstitial atoms. More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 6 Representation of mechanical twinning in a hexagonal close-packed metal. The diagonal planes are twinning planes. In the formation of a twin, each atom moves a short distance with respect to its neighbor. More
Image
Published: 01 December 2009
Fig. 3 Common slip systems for hexagonal close-packed (alpha) titanium crystals. (a) Basal < a >. (b) Prism < a >. (c) Pyramidal < c + a > More
Image
Published: 01 December 2009
Fig. 1 Close-packed planes/directions and crystallography of (a) hexagonal close-packed alpha titanium and (b) body-centered cubic beta titanium. The close-packed layer of atoms lying between the upper and lower close-packed layers has been removed from (a) for clarity. (c) Burgers orientation More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 14A
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2005
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v14a.a0004028
EISBN: 978-1-62708-185-6
... of the homogeneous effective medium (HEM). The article analyzes the anisotropy predictions of rolled face-centered-cubic and body centered-cubic sheets and presents simulations of the axial deformation of hexagonal-close-packed zirconium. The applications of polycrystal constitutive models to the simulation...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 13A
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2003
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v13a.a0003677
EISBN: 978-1-62708-182-5
..., or fretting. Titanium alloys can be classified into three primary groups such as titanium alloys with hexagonal close-packed crystallographic structure; beta titanium alloys with body-centered cubic crystallographic structures; and alpha + beta titanium alloys including near-alpha and near-beta titanium...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 23
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 June 2012
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v23.a0005669
EISBN: 978-1-62708-198-6
..., diffusionless (martensitic) phase transformation as occurs with face-centered cubic to hexagonal close-packed transformation in cobalt-chromium alloys, and stacking faults and twins and their role in this transformation. It also discusses the strengthening mechanisms that are responsible for the mechanical...
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 9 Illustration of stacking-fault sequence from generation of either a face-centered cubic or hexagonal close-packed structure, depending on the location of the third layer of close-packed atoms. Source: Ref 2 More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 3 Crystal structures for different phases in titanium alloys. (a) Body-centered cubic β phase. (b) Hexagonal close-packed α (α′) phase. (c) Orthorhombic α″ phase. (d) Hexagonal ω phase More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 9 Schematic illustration of the CBA/Fermi kit approach to billet fabrication. (a) NbTi rod is inserted into a copper tube with hexagonal OD and circular ID to yield an individual stacking unit. (b) Individual stacking units arranged in a hexagonal close-packed (hcp) array in a 250 mm (10 More
Image
Published: 01 June 2012
Fig. 4 Schematic representation of the stacking sequence of (a) face-centered cubic and (b) hexagonal close-packed crystal structures More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 18 Effect of temperature on toughness and ductility of face-centered cubic (fcc), body-centered cubic (bcc), and hexagonal close-packed (hcp) metals More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 22 Effect of temperature on toughness and ductility of face-centered cubic (fcc), body-centered cubic (bcc), and hexagonal close-packed (hcp) metals More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 1 Embrittlement and nonembrittlement couples in solid/liquid systems. hcp, hexagonal close-packed; bcc, body-centered cubic; fcc, face-centered cubic. Source: Ref 5 More
Image
Published: 27 April 2016
Fig. 2 Arrangement of atoms: (a) face-centered cubic (fcc), (b) hexagonal close-packed (hcp), and (c) body-centered cubic (bcc) crystal structures. Source: Ref 2 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2003
cubic (fcc). (b) Hexagonal close-packed (hcp). (c) Body-centered cubic unit cells (bcc) More