1-20 of 688 Search Results for

green strength

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 13 Effect of apparent density and green strength on green strength of various iron powders. Source: Ref 9 More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 14 Effect of internal powder porosity on (a) green strength and (b) green density. Solid and porous iron powders pressed at 414 MPa (30 tsi) using die wall lubrication. Figures in parentheses signify BET-specific surface areas and average intraparticle pore sizes of powders. More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 20 Green strength, green density, and apparent density of water-atomized steel powder. Source: Ref 17 More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 7 Green strength versus green density of 316L powder admixed with various lubricants and additives compacted at 414, 552, and 662 MPa (30, 40, and 48 tsi), respectively. Source: Ref 3 More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 20 Effect of compacting pressure on green strength and green density. Source: Ref 14 More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 5 Effect of particle porosity on (a) green density and (b) green strength of solid and porous iron powders. Powders were pressed at 414 MPa (30 tsi) using die wall lubrication. The figures in parentheses in (a) signify specific surface areas (as measured by the gas adsorption method More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 17 Effect of air drying time on (a) green strength and (b) baked strength of graphite molds More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 5 Green strength of various iron powders and steel fiber. AD, apparent density More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 1 Effect of residual carbon content on compressibility and green strength of water-atomized high-carbon iron powder. Pressed at 550 MPa (40 tsi) with 1% zinc stearate. More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 3 Comparison of compressibility and green strength for two iron powders: (a) compressibility and (b) green strength. Source: Ref 3 More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 7 Effect of alloying or compressibility and green strength of steel compacts. (a) Compressibility of water-atomized prealloyed powders (prealloyed powder samples mixed with 0.5% graphite + 0.75% zinc stearate and pressed to 6.8 g/cm 3 . Source: Ref 6 . (b) Green strength of steel More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 9 Effect of lubrication method on green strength. Source: Ref 1 More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 11 Compactibility (green strength) of ferritic stainless steel 434-L powder in the annealed and unannealed condition More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 12 Green strength versus compaction pressure for various types of powder. (a) Copper, iron and steel powders. (b) Iron powders More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 15 Effect of admixed lubricant on green strength of water-atomized 4600 low-alloy steel powder More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 16 Green strength and ejection pressures for various stainless steels and lubricants listed in Table 4 . Source: Ref 9 More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 17 Effect of thin film of oleic acid on green strength and electrical conductivity of copper parts More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 18 Effect of surface oxide films on green strength of copper and type 316L stainless steel powders More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 19 Effect of particle size on green strength of isostatically pressed electrolytic iron powder. Fine: 100% −325 mesh, 90% 10 to 44 μm. Medium: 22% −325 mesh, 78% −65 + 325 mesh. Coarse: 100% −42 + 100 mesh. Source: Ref 16 More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 3 Green strength of various PM premixing alternatives. EBS, ethylene bis stearamide. AncorMax is a registered tradename of Hoeganaes Corporation. More