1-20 of 1134 Search Results for

grain orientation

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 22 Relationship between deformation microstructure and grain orientation in polycrystalline aluminum (99.99%) following tension. Three types of cell block structures have been identified. Source: Ref 51 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 23 Relationship between deformation microstructure and grain orientation in polycrystalline interstitial-free iron (99.99%) following rolling, 90% cold reduction. Courtesy of X. Huang, Risø National Laboratory More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 17 Transmission electron microscopy grain orientation contrast in a sample of fine-grained polycrystalline silicon. Courtesy of Tom Headley, Sandia National Laboratories More
Image
Published: 15 December 2019
Fig. 1 Inverse pole figure orientation map and pole figures from a grain-oriented electrical steel transformer. (a) Inverse pole figure orientation map with respect to the rolling direction. (b) {001}, {110}, and {111} pole figures extracted from the electron backscatter diffraction map data More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 24 Grain orientations in standard wrought forms of alloys ( Ref 236 ) More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 9 Half hysteresis loops and dc magnetization curves for grain-oriented M-6 and cold-rolled nonoriented M-19 steels. Steel thickness is 0.36 mm (0.014 in.). More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 6 Cubic etch pits in cube-on-face grain-oriented 3% Si steel. A solution of Fe 2 (SO 4 ) 3 and sulfuric acid was used as an etchant (see Table 4 ). (a) Optical micrograph of a single αFe grain, obtained by annealing at 1175 °C (2150 °F) or higher. (b) Scanning electron micrograph More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 1 Grain orientations in standard wrought forms of alloys More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 7 Simulated and experimental grain size and orientation in Al-2.5Cu (wt%) alloys at various bulk nucleation undercoolings (Δ T b ). Source: C.P. Hong and M.F. Zhu, in The Science of Casting and Solidification , D.M. Stefanescu, R. Ruxanda, M. Tierean, and C. Serban, Ed., Lux Libris More
Image
Published: 01 November 2010
Fig. 2 Relative orientation of grain boundaries and rotation axes for different types of grain boundaries. (a) Twist boundary. (b) Asymmetrical tilt boundary. (c) Symmetrical tilt boundary More
Series: ASM Desk Editions
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 December 1998
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.mhde2.a0003153
EISBN: 978-1-62708-199-3
... Abstract This article discusses the ferromagnetic properties of soft magnetic materials, explaining the effects of impurities, alloying elements, heat treatment, grain size, and grain orientation on soft magnetic materials. It describes the types of soft magnetic materials, which include high...
Image
Published: 15 June 2020
Fig. 2 Optical micrographs (a), (b), (c) from cross section of laser powder bed fusion build. Scanning electron micrographs from surface of printed Co-Cr-Mo alloy samples with build directions of (d) 0, (e) 45, and (f) 90°. Schematic showing the relationship of grain orientation and molten More
Image
Published: 01 January 1987
orientation. The vertical dividing line is the boundary between the grains. SEM, 1150× More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 7 Selected area electron channeling pattern from a W-10Ni heavy metal alloy. The grain orientation can be determined from the pattern arising from the penetration and absorption of electrons at those locations where lattice planes in Bragg orientation cut the specimen surface More
Image
Published: 01 December 2009
Fig. 5 Relationship between boundary energy and node angle. (a) Continuum system. (b) Monte Carlo Potts model. Each grain orientation is represented by a different gray scale; the boundaries are sharp, being implicitly defined between sites of different orientations. (c) Implementation More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 9 Monel K-500 in the hot rolled condition. Structure: nickel-copper solid solution. Variation in shade of grains is the result of variation in grain orientation. Glyceregia. 100× More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 2 Same as Fig. 1 but at higher magnification. Variation in shade of grains is caused by variation in grain orientation. NaCN, (NH 4 ) 2 S 2 O 8 . 500× More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 4 Same alloy and same processing as in Fig. 3 but shown at a higher magnification. The variation in shade of the grains (dark, gray, and white) is the result of variation in grain orientation. NaCN, (NH 4 ) 2 S 2 O 8 . 500× More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 18 Steel 1 in Table 1 (grade B2), cast and heat treated at 1065 °C (1950 °F), water quenched, machined into tensile specimen, and tested. Austenite grains show different amounts of twinning, depending on individual grain orientation. Sodium chromate in glacial acetic acid (see Table 2 More
Series: ASM Handbook Archive
Volume: 10
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1986
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v10.a0001759
EISBN: 978-1-62708-178-8
... crystals, or crystallites, are relatively free of defects compared to the boundary structure. Thus, a complete description of a polycrystal is complex. On a scale of the size of the crystallites (approximately 1 μm to 1 mm), at least the shape, volume, and crystallographic orientation of each grain must...