1-20 of 720

Search Results for glass fibers

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Book Chapter

By Frederick T. Wallenberger, James C. Watson, Hong Li
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 21
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2001
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v21.a0003353
EISBN: 978-1-62708-195-5
... Abstract This article discusses the types, oxide composition, as well as mechanical and physical properties of general-purpose and special-purpose glass fibers. It describes the glass melting and fiber forming processes and provides information on important commercial products...
Image
Published: 01 January 2001
Fig. 24 “Chop marks” on the fracture surface of the glass fibers in a glass/polyimide composite tested as a notched four-point bend specimen that failed in compression. 1800× More
Image
Published: 01 November 1995
Fig. 8 Glass fibers in polypropylene. (a) Without coupling agent. (b) With coupling agent. In (a) the fibers are clean, with no resin adhesion. In (b) the resin coats and attaches to the fiber. More
Image
Published: 01 January 2001
Fig. 22 Radial marks on the surfaces of glass fibers indicative of tensile failure in a glass/polyimide composite following failure of a notched four-point bend specimen. 3000× More
Image
Published: 01 January 2001
Fig. 1 The strength of glass fibers embedded in polymer matrices, in terms of fiber strains More
Image
Published: 30 August 2021
Fig. 8 Long-term behavior of plastic cage made of PA66-GF25 and glass fibers under varying temperatures and different oils. Source: Ref 1 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 2 Composite materials made from different types of fibers. (a) Woven glass fiber fabric composite revealing a multiphase-matrix morphology. Ultrathin section, transmitted-light phase contrast, 20× objective. (b) Kevlar (E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company) fabric composite cross section More
Image
Published: 01 January 1997
Fig. 7 Normalized moduli versus fiber orientation for a glass-fiber/epoxy-resin composite (a) and a boron-fiber/epoxy-resin composite (b). The normalized Young's modulus, shear modulus, Poissons' ratio, and major shear coupling factor are illustrated for loads applied at different angles More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 6 S-N curves for (a) various AS4-epoxy laminates and (b) glass-fiber polymer laminates at various ply orientations. Source: (a) Engineered Materials Handbook, Vol 1, Composites, ASM International, 1987, p 438 and (b) C. Osgood, Fatigue Design, 2nd ed., 1982, Pergamon Press, p 530 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 7 Voids found in a glass fiber composite cross section due to solvents from manufacturing. Bright-field illumination, 10× objective More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 8 Residual curing agent particles in a thermoset-matrix glass fiber composite. Reflected-light phase contrast, 40× objective More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 2 Glass fiber honeycomb composite part submitted for failure analysis. The coordinates were established with a tape measure and a felt-tip permanent-ink marker. The starting point is the lower left corner, numbering “1” to “15” vertically (next to holes) and “A” through “E” horizontally More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 12 Voids in a glass-fiber-filled engineering thermoplastic matrix. Transmitted light, differential interference contrast, 40× objective More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 7 Microcracks in a thermoplastic-matrix glass fiber composite. Red penetration dye (DYKEM Steel Red layout fluid, Illinois Tool Works, Inc.), dark-field illumination, 25× objective More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 9 Microcracked glass fiber composite showing a lack of detail due to absorbed solvent/dye by the matrix. Red penetration dye (DYKEM Steel Red layout fluid), dark-field illumination, 10× objective More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 3 Matrix morphology differences of an engineering thermoplastic glass fiber composite that was exposed to different cooling rates. (a) Slow cooling rate. (b) Quenched to room temperature. Micrographs were taken from ultrathin sections. Transmitted polarized light, 40× objective More
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 22 Back surface normal velocity histories at the center of glass fiber-reinforced epoxy composite target. V , velocity. Source: Ref 107 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2001
Fig. 2 High-sensitivity T g detection using MDSC. Sample: glass fiber reinforced epoxy-Kevlar/polyimide; sample size: 32.9 mg; method: MDSC 2.5/60 at 1 °C/min; crimped pan; nitrogen gas purge More
Image
Published: 01 January 2001
Fig. 8 Parts made with glass fiber/epoxy prepreg using laminated object manufacturing (LOM). The part on the right has been fully cured. More
Image
Published: 01 January 2001
Fig. 8 Typical reinforcement in-plane shear behavior. 800 g/m 2 glass fiber fabrics. Source: Ref 9 More