Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
gear-tooth
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Book Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 305
Search Results for gear-tooth
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 17 Spiral bevel gear tooth. Tooth-bending fatigue with origin at the apex of the drilled bolt hole, which terminated just below the root radius. 0.5×
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 33 Spur-gear tooth showing combination failure modes. (a) Tooth-bending impact. (b) Tooth shear. Arrows indicate direction of applied force.
More
Image
Published: 09 June 2014
Fig. 18 (a) Pitch and (b) radius deviations in the gear tooth crest and tooth root regions. Source: Ref 35
More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 19 Midheight of the gear tooth at the middle of the gear thickness. This is a frequently specified standard test position for case depth of gears. It is not possible to tell from this view whether the middle position of the gear thickness is the actual test surface.
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 18 Spur-gear tooth. An internal crack originating at an oxide-type inclusion below the surface at the pitchline. A pit is being formed. Nital etch. 90×
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 20 Helical-gear tooth. Pitting initiated along and immediately above the pitchline. In some areas, the progression has been continuous. Actual size
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 23 Gear-tooth section. Rolling-contact fatigue. Crack origin subsurface. Progression was parallel to surface and inward away from surface. Not etched. 60×
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 24 Gear-tooth section. Rolling-contact fatigue. Crack origin subsurface. Progression was parallel with surface, inward, and finally to the surface to form a large pit or spall. Not etched. 60×
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 25 Gear-tooth section. Rolling-contact fatigue distinguished by subsurface shear parallel to surface. Note the undisturbed black oxides at the surface, indicating no surface-material movement. Not etched. 125×
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 29 Subsurface cracking that subsequently resulted in spalling at a gear-tooth edge. Unetched section of a carburized AMS 6260 steel gear tooth. Cracking initiated in the transition zone between the carburized case and the core. 500×
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 35 Case crushing at midprofile of a spiral bevel gear tooth. Progression is from the subcase area into the core and outward to the surface.
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 41 An internal rupture in a gear tooth at the case/core transition zone. The rupture does not reach the surface. This condition can be discovered by ultrasonic testing.
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 7 Unetched metallographic cross section through gear tooth showing subsurface fatigue crack formed by rolling contact. 132×. Source: Ref 12
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 4 Gear-tooth section. Rolling-contact fatigue. Crack origin subsurface. Progression was parallel to surface and inward away from surface. Not etched. 60×
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 5 Gear-tooth section. Rolling-contact fatigue. Crack origin subsurface. Progression was parallel with surface, inward, and finally to the surface to form a large pit or spall. Not etched. 60×
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 6 Gear-tooth section. Rolling-contact fatigue distinguished by subsurface shear parallel to surface. Note the undisturbed black oxides at the surface, indicating no surface-material movement. Not etched. 125×
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 25 Plot of hardness across the carburized layer of a gear tooth made by using a micro-indentation hardness tester with a Vickers indenter. The equivalent Rockwell C hardness is shown on the right. The effective depth of hardness is indicated by the broken line cutting the hardness plot
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 43 (a) A fatigue crack initiating close to the flank surface of the gear tooth. (b) Multiple cracks within the carburized surface layer of the tooth in another area
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
1