Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
forging pressure
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Book Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 964 Search Results for
forging pressure
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 29 Forging pressure required for upsetting versus (a) forging temperature and (b) percentage of upset reduction. Source: Ref 62
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 10 Forging pressure versus average height of forging for carbon and low-alloy steel forgings. Lower curve is for relatively simple parts; upper curve relates to more difficult-to-forge part geometries. Data are for flash land-to-thickness ratios from 2 to 4
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 4 Forging pressure required for upsetting versus (a) forging temperature and (b) percentage of upset reduction. Source: Ref 2
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 9 Forging pressure required for upsetting vs. forging temperature for austenitic stainless steels and A-286 iron-nickel superalloy. Source: Ref 5
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 6 Effect of forging temperature on forging pressure required for upsetting to a 10% reduction at hydraulic press speeds for a magnesium alloy and an aluminum alloy
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 2 Effect of forging temperature on forging pressure for three titanium alloys and 4340 alloy steel. Source: Ref 1
More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 5 Forging pressure required for upsetting versus (a) forging temperature and (b) percentage of upset reduction
More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 16 Effect of forging temperature on forging pressure required for upsetting to a 10% reduction at hydraulic press speeds for a magnesium alloy and an aluminum alloy
More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 18 Effect of forging temperature on forging pressure for three titanium alloys and 4340 alloy steel
More
Image
in Wrought Titanium and Titanium Alloys
> Properties and Selection: Nonferrous Alloys and Special-Purpose Materials
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 19 Forging pressure and flow stress of Ti-6Al-4V. (a) Effect of die temperature at various strain rates. (b) Effect of grain size distribution on flow stress versus strain rate data for Ti-6Al-4V at 927 °C (1700 °F). Lot A, average grain size of 4 μm and grain size range of 1 to 10 μm
More
Image
in Bulk Formability of Steels
> Properties and Selection: Irons, Steels, and High-Performance Alloys
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 9 Forging pressure versus temperature for three steels. Data are shown for reductions of 10 and 50%; strain rate was constant at 0.7 s −1 Source: Ref 10
More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 10 (a) Forging pressure and ejection force as functions of density for the PF-4600 powder-forged gear shown in Fig. 12 . Preform temperature: 1100 °C (2010 °F). (b) Ejection force after forging as a function of preform temperature for a powder-forged gear. Forging pressure ranged from
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 10 (a) Forging pressure and ejection force as functions of density for the P/F-4600 powder forged gear shown in Fig. 12 . Preform temperature: 1100 °C (2010 °F). (b) Ejection force after forging as a function of preform temperature for a powder forged gear. Forging pressure ranged from
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 8 Forging pressure vs. temperature for three steels. Data are shown for reductions of 10 and 50%. Strain rate was constant at 0.7 s −1 . Source: Ref 29
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 9 Forging pressure for low-carbon steel upset at various temperatures and two strain rates. Source: Ref 30
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 10 Forging pressure for AISI 4340 steel upset at various temperatures and two strain rates. Source: Ref 29
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 7 Forging pressure vs. temperature for A-286. Also shown is the effect of increasing temperature on the tensile strength of the material. Upset strain rate: 0.7 s −1 . Source: Ref 6
More
1