1-20 of 964 Search Results for

forging pressure

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 29 Forging pressure required for upsetting versus (a) forging temperature and (b) percentage of upset reduction. Source: Ref 62 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 10 Forging pressure versus average height of forging for carbon and low-alloy steel forgings. Lower curve is for relatively simple parts; upper curve relates to more difficult-to-forge part geometries. Data are for flash land-to-thickness ratios from 2 to 4 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 4 Forging pressure required for upsetting versus (a) forging temperature and (b) percentage of upset reduction. Source: Ref 2 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 9 Forging pressure required for upsetting vs. forging temperature for austenitic stainless steels and A-286 iron-nickel superalloy. Source: Ref 5 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 6 Effect of forging temperature on forging pressure required for upsetting to a 10% reduction at hydraulic press speeds for a magnesium alloy and an aluminum alloy More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 2 Effect of forging temperature on forging pressure for three titanium alloys and 4340 alloy steel. Source: Ref 1 More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 5 Forging pressure required for upsetting versus (a) forging temperature and (b) percentage of upset reduction More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 16 Effect of forging temperature on forging pressure required for upsetting to a 10% reduction at hydraulic press speeds for a magnesium alloy and an aluminum alloy More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 18 Effect of forging temperature on forging pressure for three titanium alloys and 4340 alloy steel More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 19 Forging pressure and flow stress of Ti-6Al-4V. (a) Effect of die temperature at various strain rates. (b) Effect of grain size distribution on flow stress versus strain rate data for Ti-6Al-4V at 927 °C (1700 °F). Lot A, average grain size of 4 μm and grain size range of 1 to 10 μm More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 9 Forging pressure versus temperature for three steels. Data are shown for reductions of 10 and 50%; strain rate was constant at 0.7 s −1 Source: Ref 10 More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 10 (a) Forging pressure and ejection force as functions of density for the PF-4600 powder-forged gear shown in Fig. 12 . Preform temperature: 1100 °C (2010 °F). (b) Ejection force after forging as a function of preform temperature for a powder-forged gear. Forging pressure ranged from More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 28 Effect of upset reduction on forging pressure for various temperatures. Source: Ref 61 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 9 Effect of die temperature on forging pressure at various strain rates for Ti-6Al-4V More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 10 (a) Forging pressure and ejection force as functions of density for the P/F-4600 powder forged gear shown in Fig. 12 . Preform temperature: 1100 °C (2010 °F). (b) Ejection force after forging as a function of preform temperature for a powder forged gear. Forging pressure ranged from More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 8 Forging pressure vs. temperature for three steels. Data are shown for reductions of 10 and 50%. Strain rate was constant at 0.7 s −1 . Source: Ref 29 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 9 Forging pressure for low-carbon steel upset at various temperatures and two strain rates. Source: Ref 30 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 10 Forging pressure for AISI 4340 steel upset at various temperatures and two strain rates. Source: Ref 29 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 3 Effect of upset reduction on forging pressure for various temperatures. Source: Ref 1 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 7 Forging pressure vs. temperature for A-286. Also shown is the effect of increasing temperature on the tensile strength of the material. Upset strain rate: 0.7 s −1 . Source: Ref 6 More