1-20 of 130 Search Results for

forgeability

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 6 Forgeability vs forging temperature for seven aluminum alloys. Forgeability increases as the arbitrary unit increases. More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 31 Comparative dynamic hot hardness versus temperature (forgeability) for various ferrous alloys More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 1 Forgeability and forging temperatures of various aluminum alloys More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 59 Method of preparing for notched-bar upset forgeability test. Source: Ref 73 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 60 Rating system for notched-bar upset forgeability test specimens that exhibit progressively poorer forgeability. A rating of 0 indicates freedom from ruptures in the notched area. Source: Ref 73 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 10 Typical forgeability behaviors exhibited by different alloy systems. Source: Ref 2 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 13 Method of preparing specimens for notched-bar upset forgeability testing. Source: Ref 2 , Ref 30 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 2 Influence of forgeability and flow strength in die filling. Arrow indicates increasing ease of die filling More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 1 Generalized diagram of influence of forgeability and flow strength on die filling. Shaded arrow denotes increasing ease of die filling. More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 11 Forgeability and forging temperatures of various aluminum alloys More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 7 Comparative dynamic hot hardness versus temperature (forgeability) for various ferrous alloys More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 2 Forgeability and forging temperatures of various aluminum alloys More
Image
Published: 01 January 1997
Fig. 25 Schematic curves depicting the forgeability of single-phase and two-phase alloys as a function of temperature. (a) Curve 1: pure metals and single-phase alloys (aluminum alloys, tantalum alloys, niobium alloys). Curve 2: pure metals and single-phase alloys exhibiting rapid grain growth More
Image
Published: 30 November 2018
Fig. 31 Forgeability of various aluminum alloys based on deformation per unit of energy absorbed. (a) Estimated from production experience. Adapted from Ref 44 More
Image
Published: 30 November 2018
Fig. 1 Forgeability and forging temperatures of various aluminum alloys More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 5 Forgeabilities of various carbon steels as determined using hot twist testing. Source: Ref 5 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 5 Forgeabilities of various carbon steels as determined using hot-twist testing. Source: Ref 28 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 61 Rolled rings made from two heats of type 403 stainless steel exhibiting different forgeability ratings in notched-bar upsetting test. (a) Forgeability rating is 0. (b) Forgeability rating is 4. Courtesy of Ladish Company More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 14A
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2005
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v14a.a0003996
EISBN: 978-1-62708-185-6
... Abstract This article begins with discussion on forgeability and the factors affecting the forgeability of aluminum and aluminum alloys. It describes the types of forging methods and equipment and reviews critical elements in the overall aluminum forging process: die materials, die design...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 14A
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2005
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v14a.a0009005
EISBN: 978-1-62708-185-6
... Abstract Workability in forging depends on a variety of material, process-variable, and die-design features. A number of test techniques have been developed for gaging forgeability depending on alloy type, microstructure, die geometry, and process variables. This article summarizes some common...