1-20 of 350

Search Results for fiber-matrix adhesion

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 2001
Fig. 3 Fiber-matrix adhesion dependence on interphase and matrix properties. Source: Ref 44 More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 21
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2001
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v21.a0003374
EISBN: 978-1-62708-195-5
... Abstract Fiber-matrix adhesion is a variable to be optimized in order to get the best properties and performance in composite materials. This article schematically illustrates fiber matrix interphase for composite materials. It discusses thermodynamics of interphase in terms of surface energy...
Image
Published: 01 January 2001
Fig. 4 The adhesion of the A-4 carbon fibers to the epoxy matrix, as quantified through single-fiber fragmentation tests. The fiber-matrix adhesion increases in the order AU-4 > AS-4 > AS-4C. AU-4 has the lowest level of adhesion and fails by a frictional debonding mode; AS- 4 has More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
and polished tip with excessive fiber-matrix debonding aggravating wear of composite. (d) Multiple parallel microcracks perpendicular to the sliding direction indicating fatigue with cavities due to fiber consumption, deterioration in fiber matrix adhesion, and wear thinning of longitudinal fiber. (e) Deep More
Image
Published: 01 January 2001
is more sensitive than the tensile strength to fiber-matrix adhesion. The fiber-matrix adhesion decreases in the order AS-4C > AS-4 > AU-4. AU-4 and AS- 4 exhibit interfacial failure modes; AS-4C fails in a matrix- dominated mode. Source: Ref 45 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
in fiber matrix adhesion, fiber pulverization, pullout, and peeling off followed by removal; 8, inhibition to matrix cracking; and 9, layer of back-transferred film or wear debris. Source: Ref 2 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2001
Fig. 5 Fracture surface of A-4/epoxy [±45] 3S composites, illustrating the different nature of the failure mode and interphase properties. The fiber-matrix adhesion decreases in the order AS-4C > AS-4 > AU-4. AU-4 and AS-4 exhibit interfacial failure modes; AS-4C fails in a matrix More
Image
Published: 01 January 2001
strengths all show the same trends. The fiber-matrix adhesion decreases in the order AS-4C > AS-4 > AU-4. AU-4 and AS-4 exhibit interfacial failure modes; AS-4C fails in a matrix-dominated mode. Source: Ref 45 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2001
Fig. 8 Comparison between the mode I and mode II fracture toughness of the three composite materials. The mode II fracture toughness is about three times higher than the mode I fracture toughness. The fiber-matrix adhesion decreases in the order AS-4C > AS-4 > AU-4. AU-4 and AS-4 exhibit More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 9
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 December 2004
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v09.a0009079
EISBN: 978-1-62708-177-1
... in the composite significantly affects the microcracking, as does the concentration of the toughener ( Ref 4 ). Along with the matrix constituents, the fiber properties and fiber-matrix adhesion levels also influence the microcracking susceptibility of the cured composite ( Ref 3 , 5 ). In addition...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 21
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2001
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v21.a0003460
EISBN: 978-1-62708-195-5
..., and orientation; fiber, matrix, and void-volume fractions; fiber/matrix adhesion; material crystallinity; and material defects such as porosity, delaminations, and microcracking. The article also details several different techniques used for sample preparation of different materials, including information...
Series: ASM Handbook Archive
Volume: 11
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2002
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v11.a0003572
EISBN: 978-1-62708-180-1
... depends on the type of fiber and matrix, volume fraction, distribution, aspect ratio, alignment, and adhesion to the matrix. As per Eq 7 , the higher the aspect ratio ( l / r , where l and r are the length and radius of fiber, respectively), the greater is the contact load transferred from the matrix...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 9
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 December 2004
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v09.a0009081
EISBN: 978-1-62708-177-1
... that there is extensive interlayer delamination between almost every layer. ( Figure 3b to e ) is a series of micrographs taken with higher magnification from areas in Fig. 3(a) . It can be seen that there is extensive fiber fracture ( Fig. 3b ) and mostly adhesive failure at the fiber-matrix interface, as shown...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 21
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2001
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v21.a0003471
EISBN: 978-1-62708-195-5
... the surface chemistry of reclaimed AS4 carbon fibers and compared it to virgin AS4. No significant differences in surface chemistry were noted. This is important if the fibers are to be reused in composites applications, where fiber/matrix adhesion is critical. Kennerley and coworkers ( Ref 24...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 12
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 June 2024
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v12.a0006947
EISBN: 978-1-62708-387-4
..., the majority of the glass fibers are fractured in the same plane as the matrix, exposing many fiber cross sections. The relatively few instances of fiber pullout indicate good fiber/matrix adhesion, because it took less energy to fracture the fiber than to pull the fiber out of the matrix. Fig. 22 SEM...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 11B
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 15 May 2022
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v11B.a0006869
EISBN: 978-1-62708-395-9
... in the short glass fibers (SGFs) content. The holes produced on the surface are the result of SGFs pulling out due to poor adhesion between SGFs and the PES matrix ( Ref 27 ). In general, SFRP composites show better resistance to abrasive wear compared with long, continuous fiber-reinforced composites...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 18
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 31 December 2017
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v18.a0006367
EISBN: 978-1-62708-192-4
.... Their high strength-to-weight ratio and rigidity make carbon-fiber composites ideal materials to be applied in a variety of industries, such as aerospace, automotive, and civil engineering, sports goods, and so on. Carbon fiber (CF), having an inert surface, does not allow the matrix material to bond...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 21
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2001
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v21.a0003463
EISBN: 978-1-62708-195-5
... Abstract Mechanical and environmental loadings cause a variety of failure modes in composites, including matrix cracking, fiber-matrix debonding, delamination between plies, and fiber breakage. This article summarizes visual analysis and nondestructive testing methods for the failure analysis...
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
to occur extensively at the fiber (tow)-matrix interface and is mostly adhesive failure. Epi-fluorescence, 390–440 nm excitation, 25× objective. (d) Cracks shown at the fiber (two)-matrix interface. Epi-fluorescence, 390–440 nm excitation, 25× objective. (e) Cracks spanning the resin-rich areas. Epi More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 21
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2001
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v21.a0003462
EISBN: 978-1-62708-195-5
..., and manufacturing records Visual analysis, documentation of damage and any other nondestructive part evaluation Verification of materials, including the fiber/ resin/adhesive systems Determination of fiber, matrix, and void volume fractions and verification of the lay-up, ply type, and orientation...